about __str__

[Konstantinos Pachopoulos]

Hi,
i have the following class:
=============== =============== =============
class CmterIDCmts:
def __init__(self,c ommiterID,commi ts):
self.commiterID _=long(commiter ID)
self.commits_=l ong(commits)
def __str__(self):
s=""
s+="<"+str(self .commiterID_)+" :"+str(self.com mits_)+">"
return s
=============== =============== =============

and then i create the following 2 objects and list:
=============== =============== =============
a=CmterIDCmts(2 ,3)
b=CmterIDCmts(4 ,5)
print a
print b
c=[]
c.append(a)
c.append(b)
print c
=============== =============== =============
and this is what i get:
=============== =============== =============
<2:3>
<4:5>
[<CmterIDCmts.Cm terIDCmts instance at 821045869>,
<CmterIDCmts.Cm terIDCmts instance at 1735488308>]
=============== =============== =============

The __str__ method of "list" doesn't seem to call the __str__ method of
the objects....
ie, __str__ is not equicalent to the Java toString() method... Anyway,
how can i fix this?

Thanks

[TheFlyingDutchman]

I read here recently that the __str__ method of a list calls the
__repr__ method of each of its members. So you need to add a __repr__
method to your class:

class CmterIDCmts:
def __init__(self,c ommiterID,commi ts):
self.commiterID _=long(commiter ID)
self.commits_=l ong(commits)

def __str__(self):
s=""
s+="<"+str(self .commiterID_)+" :"+str(self.com mits_)+">"
return s
def __repr__(self):
return self.__str__()

[Paul Hankin]

On Sep 20, 10:08 pm, Konstantinos Pachopoulos <kostaspa...@ya hoo.gr>
wrote:

>
The __str__ method of "list" doesn't seem to call the __str__ method of
the objects....
ie, __str__ is not equicalent to the Java toString() method... Anyway,
how can i fix this?

For whatever reason, __str__ of list calls repr rather than str on
its elements.

You can fix your code by adding __repr__ in your class:

Class CmterIDCmts:
def __init__ ...
def __str__ ...

__repr__ = __str__

--
Paul Hankin

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Konstantinos Pachopoulos a écrit :

Hi,
i have the following class:
=============== =============== =============
class CmterIDCmts:

def __init__(self,c ommiterID,commi ts):

self.commiterID _=long(commiter ID)
self.commits_=l ong(commits)

def __str__(self):
s=""
s+="<"+str(self .commiterID_)+" :"+str(self.com mits_)+">"
return s

def __str__(self):
return "<%s:%s>" % (self.commiterI D_, self.commits_)

[Mikael Olofsson]

Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:

def __str__(self):
return "<%s:%s>" % (self.commiterI D_, self.commits_)

I would write that in the following way:

def __str__(self):
return "<%(commiterID_ )s:%(commits_)s >" % self.__dict__

More explicit IMHO. And easier to maintain, especially if the string
would contain several insertions.

/MiO

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Mikael Olofsson a écrit :

Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:

>def __str__(self):
return "<%s:%s>" % (self.commiterI D_, self.commits_)

I would write that in the following way:

def __str__(self):
return "<%(commiterID_ )s:%(commits_)s >" % self.__dict__

More explicit IMHO. And easier to maintain, especially if the string
would contain several insertions.

Agreed. Well, at least until you want to access something that's not in
the instance's __dict__ !-)