C API: passing by reference

[stuart.tett]

I'm writing my own python extension module with the C API. In python
all functions pass arguments by reference, but how can I make use of
this in C? Right now, I am using:

PyArg_ParseTupl e(args, "(ii)(ii)", &faceId1, &vertId1, &faceId2,
&vertId2)

I want the to change the faceId's in my function. From what I've seen
you can't do this safely with PyArg_ParseTupl e.

Do I have another option?

Otherwise, I just have to return an extra variable. But it would be
much much nicer to just have the faceId's change if the arguments
passed were variables.

Thanks!

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=]

st*********@gma il.com schrieb:

I'm writing my own python extension module with the C API. In python
all functions pass arguments by reference

Can you please show an example what you mean by that? There is no
"pass-by-reference" in Python: a function can not normally modify
the variable in the caller.

When you show what precisely you want to achieve, it should be easy
to say how to do that in C.

Regards,
Martin

[Carsten Haese]

On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 18:25 +0000, st*********@gma il.com wrote:

I'm writing my own python extension module with the C API. In python
all functions pass arguments by reference,

"Pass by reference", while correct from a certain standpoint, is to be
taken with a large grain of salt. It is correct in so far as the value
is not copied. It is incorrect in so far as, in general, you may not be
able to modify the object that's passed.

The reference you receive can only be used to call methods of the
referenced object, if it has any, or manipulate attributes of the
object, if it has any. It can not be used to replace the object with
another object.

but how can I make use of
this in C? Right now, I am using:

You can't.

PyArg_ParseTupl e(args, "(ii)(ii)", &faceId1, &vertId1, &faceId2,
&vertId2)

I want the to change the faceId's in my function. From what I've seen
you can't do this safely with PyArg_ParseTupl e.

Not with PyArg_ParseTupl e, not with anything. Your function receives a
reference to an int object. Since int objects are immutable, you can't
replace the number that's in the int object.

Do I have another option?

Return the value instead of trying to produce side-effects in the
caller's name space.

HTH,

--
Carsten Haese
http://informixdb.sourceforge.net

[stuart.tett]

Thanks for that clarification Martin. When I googled it before, the
first page I read said "Python passes all arguments using 'pass by
reference'." However, after seeing your reply and further searching I
see that this is not true.

I have a python function insertEdge which takes to 2-tuples of
(faceid,vertexi d) and returns the edgeid. But upon execution of the
function the two vertexid's end up sharing the same faceid. So right
now my solution is just to also return the two new (faceid,vertexi d).
These will both have the same vertexid as before, but have a different
faceid then before (sharing the same faceid).

Here for example is a script to create a triangle:

v1 = createVertex((0 ,0,0))
v2 = createVertex((1 ,0,0))
e1,v1,v2 = insertEdge(v1,v 2)
v3 = createVertex((0 ,1,0))
e2,v2,v3 = insertEdge(v2,v 3)
e3,v3,v1 = insertEdge(v3,v 1)

Here is the C++ code:

static PyObject *
dlfl_insert_edg e(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
{
uint faceId1;
int vertId1;
uint faceId2;
int vertId2;
int edgeId = -1;

if( !PyArg_ParseTup le(args, "(ii)(ii)", &faceId1, &vertId1,
&faceId2, &vertId2) )
return NULL;

if( currObj ) {
edgeId = DLFL::insertEdg e( currObj, faceId1, vertId1, faceId2,
vertId2 );
currObj->clearSelecte d( );
}

return Py_BuildValue(" i,(ii)(ii)", edgeId, faceId1, vertId1,
faceId2, vertId2 );
}

This works, but...
Any suggestions if there is a cleaner way?

Thanks!

On Jun 23, 1:31 pm, "Martin v. Löwis" <[e-mail] s.dewrote:

stuart.t...@gma il.com schrieb:

I'm writing my own python extension module with the C API. In python
all functions pass arguments by reference

Can you please show an example what you mean by that? There is no
"pass-by-reference" in Python: a function can not normally modify
the variable in the caller.

When you show what precisely you want to achieve, it should be easy
to say how to do that in C.

Regards,
Martin