One thing I sometimes miss, which is common in some other languages (c++),
is idea of block scope. It would be useful to have variables that did not
outlive their block, primarily to avoid name clashes. This also leads to
more readable code. I wonder if this has been discussed?
Apr 6 '07
24 2676 al***@mac.com (Alex Martelli) writes:
Thus the following example does not compile:
class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int i;
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
I'm ok with this; at the minimum, I think such nesting should produce
a warning message.
Steve Holden <st***@holdenwe b.comwrote:
What do you think the chances are of this being accepted for Python 3.0?
It is indeed about the most rational approach, though of course it does
cause problems with dynamic namespaces.
What problems do you have in mind? The compiler already determines the
set of names that are local variables for a function; all it needs to do
is diagnose an error or warning if the set of names for a nested
function overlaps with that of an outer one.
I shamefully admit that I haven't followed Python 3.0 discussions much
lately, so I don't really know what's planned on this issue.
Alex
Paul Rubin <http://ph****@NOSPAM.i nvalidwrote: al***@mac.com (Alex Martelli) writes:
Thus the following example does not compile:
class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int i;
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
I'm ok with this; at the minimum, I think such nesting should produce
a warning message.
Yes, a warning could surely be a reasonable compromise.
Alex
In article <1h************ *************** @mac.com>,
Alex Martelli <al***@mac.comw rote:
>Steve Holden <st***@holdenwe b.comwrote:
>> What do you think the chances are of this being accepted for Python 3.0? It is indeed about the most rational approach, though of course it does cause problems with dynamic namespaces.
What problems do you have in mind? The compiler already determines the set of names that are local variables for a function; all it needs to do is diagnose an error or warning if the set of names for a nested function overlaps with that of an outer one.
exec?
--
Aahz (aa**@pythoncra ft.com) <* http://www.pythoncraft.com/
Why is this newsgroup different from all other newsgroups?
Paul Rubin wrote:
John Nagle <na***@animats. comwrites:
> In a language with few declarations, it's probably best not to have too many different nested scopes. Python has a reasonable compromise in this area. Functions and classes have a scope, but "if" and "for" do not. That works adequately.
I think Perl did this pretty good. If you say "my $i" that declares
$i to have block scope, and it's considered good practice to do this,
but it's not required. You can say "for (my $i=0; $i < 5; $i++) { ... }"
and that gives $i the same scope as the for loop. Come to think of it
you can do something similar in C++.
Those languages have local declarations. "my" is a local
declaration. If you have explicit declarations, explict block
scope is no problem. Without that, there are problems. Consider
def foo(s, sname) :
if s is None :
result = ""
else :
result = s
msg = "Value of %s is %s" % (sname, result)
return(msg)
It's not that unusual in Python to initialize a variable on
two converging paths. With block scope, you'd break
code that did that.
John Nagle
Aahz <aa**@pythoncra ft.comwrote:
In article <1h************ *************** @mac.com>,
Alex Martelli <al***@mac.comw rote:
Steve Holden <st***@holdenwe b.comwrote:
>
What do you think the chances are of this being accepted for Python 3.0?
It is indeed about the most rational approach, though of course it does
cause problems with dynamic namespaces.
What problems do you have in mind? The compiler already determines the
set of names that are local variables for a function; all it needs to do
is diagnose an error or warning if the set of names for a nested
function overlaps with that of an outer one.
exec?
option 1: that just runs the compiler a bit later -- thus transforming
ClashingVariabl eError into a runtime issue, exactly like it already does
for SyntaxError.
option 2: since a function containing any exec statement does not
benefit from the normal optimization of local variables, let it also
forgo the normal diagnosis of shadowed/clashing names.
option 3: extend the already-existing prohibition of mixing exec with
nested functions:
>>def outer():
.... def inner(): return x
.... exec('x=23')
.... return inner()
....
File "<stdin>", line 3
SyntaxError: unqualified exec is not allowed in function 'outer' it
contains a nested function with free variables
to prohibit any mixing of exec and nested functions (not just those
cases where the nested function has free variables).
My personal favorite is option 3.
Alex al***@mac.com (Alex Martelli) writes:
exec?
option 1: that just runs the compiler a bit later ...
Besides exec, there's also locals(), i.e.
locals['x'] = 5
can shadow a variable. Any bad results are probably deserved ;)
On Apr 7, 8:50 am, James Stroud <jstr...@mbi.uc la.eduwrote:
Paul Rubin wrote:
John Nagle <n...@animats.c omwrites:
In a language with few declarations, it's probably best not to
have too many different nested scopes. Python has a reasonable
compromise in this area. Functions and classes have a scope, but
"if" and "for" do not. That works adequately.
I think Perl did this pretty good. If you say "my $i" that declares
$i to have block scope, and it's considered good practice to do this,
but it's not required. You can say "for (my $i=0; $i < 5; $i++) { ... }"
and that gives $i the same scope as the for loop. Come to think of it
you can do something similar in C++.
How then might one define a block? All lines at the same indent level
and the lines nested within those lines?
i = 5
for my i in xrange(4):
if i: # skips first when i is 0
my i = 100
if i:
print i # of course 100
break
print i # i is between 0 & 3 here
print i # i is 5 here
Doesn't leave a particularly bad taste in one's mouth, I guess (except
for the intended abuse).
How about something like this instead:
i = 5
block:
for i in xrange(4):
if i: # skips first when i is 0
block:
i = 100
if i:
print i # of course 100
break
print i # i is between 0 & 3 here
print i # i is 5 here
Any variable that's assigned to within a block would be local to that
block, as it is in functions.
Paul Rubin <http://ph****@NOSPAM.i nvalidwrote: al***@mac.com (Alex Martelli) writes:
exec?
option 1: that just runs the compiler a bit later ...
Besides exec, there's also locals(), i.e.
locals['x'] = 5
can shadow a variable. Any bad results are probably deserved ;)
>>locals['x']=5
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: 'builtin_functi on_or_method' object does not support item
assignment
I suspect you want to index the results of calling locals(), rather than
the builtin function itself. However:
>>def f():
.... locals()['x'] = 5
.... return x
....
>>f()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "<stdin>", line 3, in f
NameError: global name 'x' is not defined
No "shadowing" , as you see: the compiler knows that x is NOT local,
because it's not assigned to (the indexing of locals() does not count:
the compiler's not expected to detect that), so it's going to look it up
as a global variable (and not find it in this case).
I think that ideally there should be a runtime error when assigning an
item of locals() with a key that's not a local variable name (possibly
excepting functions containing exec, which are kind of screwy anyway).
Alex al***@mac.com (Alex Martelli) writes:
>locals['x']=5
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: 'builtin_functi on_or_method' object does not support item
assignment
Whoops, yeah, meant "locals()['x'] = 5".
I think that ideally there should be a runtime error when assigning an
item of locals() with a key that's not a local variable name (possibly
excepting functions containing exec, which are kind of screwy anyway).
I have no opinion of this, locals() has always seemed like a crazy
part of the language to me and I never use it. I'd be happy to see it
gone since it makes compiling a lot easier. This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: mike420 |
last post by:
I think everyone who used Python will agree that its syntax is
the best thing going for it. It is very readable and easy
for everyone to learn. But, Python does not a have very good
macro capabilities, unfortunately. I'd like to know if it may
be possible to add a powerful macro system to Python, while
keeping its amazing syntax, and if it could be possible to
add Pythonistic syntax to Lisp or Scheme, while keeping all
of the...
|
by: Minti |
last post by:
I was reading some text and I came across the following snippet
switch('5')
{
int x = 123;
case '5':
printf("The value of x %d\n", x);
break;
}
|
by: G Patel |
last post by:
I've seen some code with extern modifiers in front of variables
declared inside blocks. Are these purely definitions (no definition)
or are they definitions with static duration but external linkage?
Not much on this in the FAQ or tutorials.
|
by: seamoon |
last post by:
Hi,
I'm doing a simple compiler with C as a target language. My language uses
the possibility to declare variables anywhere in a block with scope to the
end of the block. As I remembered it this would be easily translated to C,
but it seems variable declaration is only possible in the beginning of a
block in C. Any suggestions how to get around this?
|
by: Bill Priess |
last post by:
Hey gang,
Ok, I'm stumped on this one... I am using the using statement to wrap a
SqlDataAdapter that I am using to fill a DataTable. Now, what I need to know
is, just how much block-scope applies to objects created in the using scope.
For example:
<code>
static DataTable getTable()
| |
by: Anoj |
last post by:
Hi All,
As you all know in vb.net we can declare block level
variables. Like :
Dim I As Integer
For I = 1 To 3
Dim N As Long
' N has block scope in VB.NET
N = N + I
Next
|
by: |
last post by:
Is it possible to define a variable in a block in order to make
it invisible outside that block? For example, in C I can write
{
int a
....
}
then a will only be available inside the curley brackets
|
by: Dieter |
last post by:
Hi.
In the snippet of code below, I'm trying to understand why when the
struct dirent ** namelist
is declared with "file" scope, I don't have a problem freeing the
allocated memory. But when the struct is declared in main (block scope)
it will segfault when passing namelist to freeFileNames().
|
by: shilpa |
last post by:
Hi,
I just wanted to know whether we can access global variable within a
local block , where both variables are having same name.
For ex:
int temp=5 ;
{
int temp=10;
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| |
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |