473,718 Members | 2,099 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

module to implement Abstract Base Class

I had a need recently to check if my subclasses properly implemented
the desired interface and wished that I could use something like an
abstract base class in python. After reading up on metaclass magic, I
wrote the following module. It is mainly useful as a light weight tool
to help programmers catch mistakes at definition time (e.g., forgetting
to implement a method required by the given interface). This is handy
when unit tests or running the actual program take a while.

Comments and suggestions are welcome.

############### Abstract Base Class Module
Follows######## ############### #

This module provides the AbstractBaseCla ss class and the Abstract
to allow you to define abstract base classes in python. See the
for AbstractBaseCla ss for instructions.

class _AbstractMetaCl ass(type):
This is a metaclass designed to act as an AbstractBaseCla ss.
You should rarely need to use this directly. Inheret from
the class (not metaclass) AbstractBaseCla ss instead.

Feel free to skip reading this metaclass and go on to the
documentation for AbstractBaseCla ss.

def __init__(cls, name, bases, dict):
"""Initiali ze the class if Abstract requirements are met.

If the class is supposed to be abstract or it is concrete and
implements all @Abstract methods, then instantiate it.
Otherwise, an
AssertionError is raised.

Alternatively, if cls.__allow_abs tract__ is True, then the
class is instantiated and no checks are done.

if (__debug__ and not getattr(cls,'__ allow_abstract_ _',False)
and not _AbstractMetaCl ass._IsSupposed ToBeAbstract(cl s)):
abstractMethods = _AbstractMetaCl ass._GetAbstrac tMethods(
for name in abstractMethods :
if ( getattr(getattr (cls,name),'__a bstract__',Fals e)):
klasses =
_AbstractMetaCl ass._GetParents Requiring(name, cls)
if (len(klasses)== 0):
klasses = '(Unknown); all parents are %s.' % (
klasses = str(klasses)
raise AssertionError(
'Class %s must override %s to implement:\n%s. '
% (cls,name,klass es))

super(_Abstract MetaClass,cls). __init__(name,b ases,dict)

def __call__(self, *args, **kw):
"""Only allow instantiation if Abstract requirements are met.

If there are methods that are still abstract and
__allow_abstrac t__
is not set to True, raise an assertion error. Otherwise,
instantiate the class.
if (__debug__):
stillAbstract = [
name for name in
_AbstractMetaCl ass._GetAbstrac tMethods([self])
if (getattr(getatt r(self,name),'_ _abstract__',Fa lse))]
assert (getattr(self,' __allow_abstrac t__',False)
or len(stillAbstra ct) == 0), (
"""Cannot instantiate abstract base class %s
because the follwoing methods are still abstract:\n%s"" " %
(str(self),stil lAbstract))
return type.__call__(s elf,*args,**kw)

def _IsSupposedToBe Abstract(cls):
"""Return true if cls is supposed to be an abstract class.

A class which is ''supposed to be abstract'' is one which
directly inherits from AbstractBaseCla ss. Due to metaclass
magic, the easiest way to check this is to look for the
__intended_abst ract__ attribute which only AbstractBaseCla ss
should have.
for parent in cls.__bases__:
if (parent.__dict_ _.get('__intend ed_abstract__', False)):
return True

def _GetAbstractMet hods(classList, abstractMethods =None):
"""Returns all abstract methods in a list of classes.

Takes classList which is a list of classes to look through and
optinally takes abstractMethods which is a dict containing
of abstract methods already found.
if (None == abstractMethods ):
abstractMethods = {}
for cls in classList:
for name in cls.__dict__:
method = getattr(cls,nam e)
if (callable(metho d) and
getattr(method, '__abstract__', False)):
abstractMethods[name] = True
_AbstractMetaCl ass._GetAbstrac tMethods(cls.__ bases__,
abstractMethods )
return abstractMethods .keys()

def _GetParentsRequ iring(methodNam e,cls):
"""Return list of parents that have a method defined as

Arguments are methodName (string representing name of method to
and cls (the class whose parents should be checked).
result = []
for parent in cls.__bases__:
if (getattr(parent ,methodName,Fal se) and

getattr(getattr (parent,methodN ame),'__abstrac t__',False)):
result.append(p arent)
return result
class AbstractBaseCla ss(object):
The AbstractBaseCla ss represents a class that defines some methods
which must be implemented by non-abstract children. To use it, have
class inhereit from AbstractBaseCla ss and use the @Abstract
on the methods you want to be abstract. You can have many
of abstract base classes inheriting from each other and adding
methods as long as they all inherit from AbstractBaseCla ss.

If any class which does not DIRECTLY inherit from
AbstractBaseCla ss, but
does INDIRECTLY inherit from AbstractBaseCla ss must override all
abstract methods. Otherwise, an AssertionError will be raised when
the offending class is defined.

What if you decide you want to turn of all checking and really do
want to
instantiate an abstract class? Just do klass.__allow_a bstract__ =
and klass will no longer enforce the Abstract limitations.

The following is an example of how this pattern can be used:
>>class abstract(Abstra ctBaseClass): # this will be the AbstractBaseCla ss
.... @Abstract
.... def foo(self,x): pass # declared abstract even though we def it
>>try: # illustrate what happens when you don't implement @Abstract methods
.... class fails(abstract) : # an erroneous implementation of
.... pass # since it doesn't implment foo
.... except AssertionError, e:
.... print e
Class <class '__main__.fails 'must override foo to implement:
[<class '__main__.abstr act'>].
>>class concrete(abstra ct): # will be a concrete class implementing abstract
.... def foo(self,x):
.... return x+2

You can even create abstract classes that inherit from
abstract classes to gradually build up abstractions as
shown below:
>>class AbstractCar(Abs tractBaseClass) :
.... @Abstract
.... def Drive(self): pass
>>class AbstractFastCar (AbstractCar,Ab stractBaseClass ):# inherit from ABC
.... @Abstract # so that
.... def DriveFast(self) : pass # doesn't
worry about
.... # Drive being
>># Note that children of AbstractFastCar which are not abstract, must
# implement both DriveFast as requied by AbstractFastCar as well as
# Drive as required by AbstractCar.
try: # breaks since you don't implement Drive as requiered by AbstractCar
.... class BadCar(Abstract FastCar):
.... def DriveFast(self) : pass
.... except AssertionError, e:
.... print str(e)
Class <class '__main__.BadCa r'must override Drive to implement:
[<class '__main__.Abstr actFastCar'>].
>>try:#breaks since you don't implement DriveFast required by AbstractFastCar
.... class BadCar(Abstract FastCar):
.... def Drive(self): pass
.... except AssertionError, e:
.... print str(e)
Class <class '__main__.BadCa r'must override DriveFast to implement:
[<class '__main__.Abstr actFastCar'>].
>>class FastCar(Abstrac tFastCar): # this works since you implement both
.... def Drive(self): pass
.... def DriveFast(self) : pass
>>c = FastCar()
If you don't like someone elses abstraction requirements, you
easily turn checking of the @Abstract requirements on and off.
>>class abstract(Abstra ctBaseClass):
.... @Abstract
.... def foo(self,x): pass
>>abstract.__al low_abstract__ = True # turn of all checking
class fails(abstract) : pass # define a class failing requirements
fails().foo(' ignore') # call its abstract method
abstract.__al low_abstract__ = False # turn checking back on
.... class bad(abstract): pass
.... except AssertionError, e:
.... print str(e)
Class <class '__main__.bad'm ust override foo to implement:
[<class '__main__.abstr act'>].
You can even use multiple inheritence to combine abstractions:
>>class AbstractCar(Abs tractBaseClass) :
.... @Abstract
.... def Drive(self): pass
>>class AbstractPlane(A bstractBaseClas s):
.... @Abstract
.... def Fly(self): pass
>>class AbstractFlyingC ar(AbstractCar, AbstractPlane,A bstractBaseClas s): pass
.... class Car(AbstractFly ingCar):
.... def Drive(self): pass
.... except AssertionError, e:
.... print 'not right'
not right
>>class FlyingCar(Abstr actFlyingCar):
.... def Fly(self): pass
.... def Drive(self): pass
>># You can also define something which inherits both the car and plane
# abstractions without the extra layer of AbstractFlyingC ar.
class FlyingCar(Abstr actCar,Abstract Plane):
.... def Fly(self): pass
.... def Drive(self): pass

__metaclass__ = _AbstractMetaCl ass
__intended_abst ract__ = True

def Abstract(func):
This is a function decorator that adds the attribute __abstract__
a method function with the attribute having the value True.
See documentation for AbstractBaseCla ss for how to use this
if (__debug__):
def wrapper(*_args, **_kw):
result = func(*_args,**_ kw)
assert getattr(_args[0],'__allow_abstr act__',False), (
'Called Abstract method %s. Override %s; %s.' % (
func.__name__,f unc.__name__,"d on't call it directly"))
return result
wrapper.__dict_ _ = func.__dict__
wrapper.__name_ _ = func.__name__
wrapper.__doc__ = func.__doc__
wrapper.__abstr act__ = True
return wrapper
return func

def _regr_test_chil dren():
Regression test to make sure things work properly with more
complicated inheritence for AbstractBaseCla ss.
>>class abstract(Abstra ctBaseClass): # this will be the AbstractBaseCla ss
.... @Abstract
.... def foo(self,x): # this is declared abstract even though we def
it here
.... raise Exception('You must override this method.')
.... @Abstract
.... def bar(self,x): # this is declared abstract even though we def
it here
.... raise Exception('You must override this method.')
>>class partial: # will be a partial implementation so don't inherit
.... def foo(self,x):
.... return x+2
>>class concrete(partia l,abstract): #provides concrete implementation
.... def bar(self,y):
.... return y+3
.... class switch(abstract ,partial): # order matters!
.... pass
.... except AssertionError, a:
.... print 'order matters!'
order matters!

def _regr_test_wrap ping():
Regression test to make sure that @Abstract decorator works
>>class abstract(Abstra ctBaseClass):
.... @Abstract
.... def foo(self,x):
.... 'docstring for foo'
>>assert abstract.foo.__ doc__ == 'docstring for foo'
assert abstract.foo.__ name__ == 'foo'
try: # verify that you can't instantiate an abstract class
.... a = abstract()
.... except AssertionError, e:
.... print str(e)
Cannot instantiate abstract base class <class '__main__.abstr act'>
because the follwoing methods are still abstract:
>>try: # even if programmer instantiate abstract, can't call abstract methods
.... a = object.__new__( abstract)
.... a.foo(1)
.... except AssertionError, e:
.... print str(e)
Called Abstract method foo. Override foo; don't call it directly.
>>abstract.__al low_abstract__ = True # turn of all checking
class x(abstract): pass
y = x()
def _test():
import doctest
doctest.testmod ()

if __name__ == "__main__":
print 'Test finished.'

Dec 22 '06 #1
0 2829

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

by: Medi Montaseri | last post by:
Hi, I think my problem is indeed "how to implement something like java's final in C++" The long version.... I have an abstract base class which is inherited by several concrete classes. I have a group of methods that I'd like to implement in the base class
by: Chris Capel | last post by:
What is the rationale behind the decision not to allow abstract static class members? It doesn't seem like it's a logically contradictory concept, or that the implementation would be difficult or near-impossible. It seems like it would be useful. In fact, there's a place in my code that I could make good use of it. So why not? Chris
by: Chuck Bowling | last post by:
I am using CodeDOM to generate source files. The classes being generated have a const string member. This member is referenced in an abstract base class but declared in the inheriting class. I can't declare the string in the abstract class because it would require initialization. Is there a way to require that any class inheriting from the base class contain this string without a specific declaration in the base class? I tried putting a...
by: Jinsong Liu | last post by:
I have a class which serve as a base class. I want to focuses all the classes derived from it implement a interface. Make it a abstract class is not a option since some XML serialization code need to initialize the class. is it possible? thanks
by: Frank | last post by:
I'm running into trouble and I hope someone can help. I have two assemblies. The first defines a base class and a series of distinct classes based on the base class. Something similar too: // BASE CLASS public class PacketBase { public virtual bool PacketOnReceive() {
by: jason | last post by:
In the microsoft starter kit Time Tracker application, the data access layer code consist of three cs files. DataAccessHelper.cs DataAcess.cs SQLDataAccessLayer.cs DataAcccessHelper appears to be checking that the correct data type is used DataAcess sets an abstract class and methods
by: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP] | last post by:
I get C:\Programming\LTM\devtools\UselessJunkForDissassembly\Class1.cs(360,27): error CS0535: 'UselessJunkForDissassembly.InvocableInternals' does not implement interface member 'UselessJunkForDissassembly.IInvocableInternals.OperationValidate(string)' C:\Programming\LTM\devtools\UselessJunkForDissassembly\Class1.cs(360,27): error CS0535: 'UselessJunkForDissassembly.InvocableInternals' does not implement interface member...
by: Tony Johansson | last post by:
Hello! Below I have a working program. I have one generic class called Farm<T> with this header definition public class Farm<T: IEnumerable<Twhere T : Animal Now to my question I changed the inheritance of the IEnumerable from the generic IEnumerable<T> to the generel IEnumerable and the program function just the same so no
by: Rafe | last post by:
Hi, I am in a situation where I feel I am being forced to abandon a clean module structure in favor of a large single module. If anyone can save my sanity here I would be forever grateful. My problem is that classes in several modules share a common base class which needs to implement a factory method to return instances of these same classes.
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed. This is as boiled down as I can make it. Here is my compilation command: g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp Here is the code in...
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth. The Art of Business Website Design Your website is...
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
by: TSSRALBI | last post by:
Hello I'm a network technician in training and I need your help. I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs. The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols. I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
by: 6302768590 | last post by:
Hai team i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.