deriving from complex

[Schüle Daniel]

Hello

I am trying to customize the handling of complex numbers
what I am missing is a builtin possibility to create
complex numbers in polar coordinates

so first I wrote a standalone function

def polar(r,arg): .... re, im = r*cos(arg), r*sin(arg)
.... return re + im*1j

then I tried to extend this to a class
from math import * class Complex(complex ): .... def __init__(self,x ,y,polar=False) :
.... if not polar:
.... self.re, self.im = x,y
.... else:
.... self.re, self.im = x*cos(y), x*sin(y)
....
c=Complex(1,1)
c (1+1j) p=Complex(10,45 .0/360*2*pi,True) Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: complex() takes at most 2 arguments (3 given)
and got stuck with this error
it seems that last argument is rejected
because complex wants to have 2 arguments
but this works well ..
class X(object): .... def __init__(self,a ):
.... self.a = a
.... class Y(X): .... def __init__(self,a ,b):
.... self.a = a
.... self.b = b
.... y=Y(1,2)
what's causing the above exception?

one more question
class Complex(complex ): .... def __init__(self,x ,y):
.... self.real = x
.... self.imag = y
.... c=Complex(1,1) Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
File "<stdin>", line 3, in __init__
TypeError: readonly attribute

how can I work around this problem?

Regards, Daniel

[Schüle Daniel]

what do you think of this design?

def polar(x,y=None) : .... if type(x) in (list,tuple) and len(x) == 2 and y is None:
.... return complex(x[0]*cos(x[1]), x[0]*sin(x[1]))
.... if type(x) is complex and y is None:
.... return (abs(x), atan2(x.imag,x. real))
.... if type(x) in (float, int, long) and type(y) in (float, int, long):
.... return complex(x*cos(y ), x*sin(y))
.... polar(2**0.5, 45.0/360*2*pi) (1.000000000000 0002+1j) polar((2**0.5, 45.0/360*2*pi)) (1.000000000000 0002+1j) polar([2**0.5, 45.0/360*2*pi]) (1.000000000000 0002+1j) polar(1+1j) (1.414213562373 0951, 0.7853981633974 4828)

btw I like how Ruby handles the creation of complex numbers

c = Complex(1,1)
p = Complex.polar(1 ,45.0/360*2*PI)

Regards, Daniel

[Scott David Daniels]

Schüle Daniel wrote:

I am trying to customize the handling of complex numbers
what I am missing is a builtin possibility to create
complex numbers in polar coordinates.... I wrote...:

>>> def polar(r,arg): ... re, im = r*cos(arg), r*sin(arg)
... return re + im*1j
then I tried to extend this to a class >>> class Complex(complex ):

... def __init__(self,x ,y,polar=False) :
... if not polar:
... self.re, self.im = x,y
... else:
... self.re, self.im = x*cos(y), x*sin(y)

What you are missing is that complex is an immutable type.
You need to fiddle with __new__, not __init__.

class Complex(complex ):
def __new__(class_, x, y=0.0, polar=False):
if polar:
return complex.__new__ (class_, x * cos(y), x * sin(y))
else:
return complex.__new__ (class_, x, y)

Which will produce instances of Complex, or:

class Complex(complex ):
def __new__(class_, x, y=0.0, polar=False):
if polar:
return complex(x * cos(y), x * sin(y))
else:
return complex(class_, x, y)

Which will produce instances of complex.

--Scott David Daniels
sc***********@a cm.org

[Scott David Daniels]

Scott David Daniels wrote:

Schüle Daniel wrote:

...

And, of course, I reply with a cutto-pasto (pre-success code). ...
Which will produce instances of Complex, or:
class Complex(complex ):
def __new__(class_, x, y=0.0, polar=False):
if polar:
return complex(x * cos(y), x * sin(y))
else:
return complex(class_, x, y)

This last line should, of course, be:
return complex(x, y)

--Scott David Daniels
sc***********@a cm.org

[Scott David Daniels]

Schüle Daniel wrote:
....

btw I like how Ruby handles the creation of complex numbers

c = Complex(1,1)
p = Complex.polar(1 ,45.0/360*2*PI)

class Complex(complex ):
@classmethod
def polar(class_, radius, angle):
return class_(radius * cos(angle), radius * sin(angle))

--Scott David Daniels
sc***********@a cm.org

[Schüle Daniel]

thank you
I will have to take a closer look on __new__

Regards, Daniel

[ajsiegel]

Schüle Daniel wrote:

thank you
I will have to take a closer look on __new__

Regards, Daniel

The pypy implementation of the complex builtin may give you some
clues.

I found it helpful.

http://codespeak.net/svn/pypy/dist/pypy/lib/cmath.py

Art

[ajsiegel]

Meant:

http://codespeak.net/svn/pypy/dist/p...app_complex.py