overloading __getattr__ and inheriting from dict

[Benoît Dejean]

class TargetWrapper(d ict):

def __init__(self, **kwargs):
dict.__init__(s elf, kwargs)

__getattr__ = dict.__getitem_ _
__setattr__ = dict.__setitem_ _
__delattr__ = dict.__delitem_ _

then

tw = TargetWrapper()
tw.a = "spam" # ok
del tw.a # ok
tw.b = "egg"
print tw.b

last line give me an
AttributeError: 'TargetWrapper' object has no attribute 'b'

if i define

def __getitem__(sel f, name):
return dict.__getitem_ _(self, name)

__getattr__ = __getitem__

then the accessing the b attribute is ok. what's wrong ?

[Michael Hudson]

Benoît Dejean <bn********@ifr ance.com> writes:

class TargetWrapper(d ict):

def __init__(self, **kwargs):
dict.__init__(s elf, kwargs)

__getattr__ = dict.__getitem_ _
__setattr__ = dict.__setitem_ _
__delattr__ = dict.__delitem_ _

then

tw = TargetWrapper()
tw.a = "spam" # ok
del tw.a # ok
tw.b = "egg"
print tw.b

last line give me an
AttributeError: 'TargetWrapper' object has no attribute 'b'

if i define

def __getitem__(sel f, name):
return dict.__getitem_ _(self, name)

__getattr__ = __getitem__

then the accessing the b attribute is ok. what's wrong ?

I'm not sure, but changing

__getattr__ = dict.__getitem_ _

to

__getattribute_ _ = dict.__getitem_ _

makes things behave more like I think you expect.

Cheers,
mwh

--
Of course, it obviously is beta hardware so such things are to be
expected, but that doesn't mean that you can't point your fingers
and generate a nelson style HAHA at a multi billion dollar
corporation's expense. -- CmdrTaco on slashdot.org