Working with copies of a dictionary

[Tobias Pfeiffer]

Hi!

Damnit, am I angry! Please look at the following example:

class bla:
def __init__(self):
self.ho = {'a': ['b'], 'c': ['b', 'e', 'f', 'd'], 'b':
['a', 'e', 'f', 'c'], 'e': ['b', 'c', 'g', 'h'], 'd': ['c'], 'g': ['e',
'h'], 'f': ['b', 'c'], 'h': ['e', 'g']} # shall be an adjacence list of
a graph...
self.oha = [('a', 'b'), ('b', 'c'), ('b', 'e'), ('b', 'f'),
('c', 'd'), ('c', 'e'), ('c', 'f'), ('e', 'g'), ('e', 'h'), ('g', 'h')]
def do_stuff(self):
next = self.ho.copy() # HERE!!!

edges = self.oha[:]

next['c'].remove('e')
next['g'].remove('h')
del next['b']
edges.pop(0)
edges.pop(3)
edges.pop(6)

f = bla()
print f.ho
print f.oha

OK, so the two last lines, what surprising thing give me exactly the
long dictionary I defined in __init__.

f.do_stuff()

Now you see that I do nothing with the self.* thingies themselves. So
why in hell do the following two lines give me a different output???

print f.ho
print f.oha

f.oha hasn't changed, but f.ho now lacks the two elements I deleted
from next with the remove() call, while the 'b' array is still there.
Now can anyone please explain me why do_stuff() ha changed the
attributes of the class?? Even the following:

next = {}
for v, e in self.ho.items() :
next[v] = e

, where one can easily see that next does not even have the slightest
connection to f.ho, changes it!! I am completely desparate, because I
would just like to work with the copy of that dictionary, without
deleting the proper one. How can I do such a thing?

Thanks in Advance
Tobias

--
please send any mail to botedesschatten s(at)web(dot)de

[Duncan Smith]

"Tobias Pfeiffer" <[e-mail] > wrote in message
news:br******** ****@ID-162581.news.uni-berlin.de...

Hi!

Damnit, am I angry! Please look at the following example:

class bla:
def __init__(self):
self.ho = {'a': ['b'], 'c': ['b', 'e', 'f', 'd'], 'b':
['a', 'e', 'f', 'c'], 'e': ['b', 'c', 'g', 'h'], 'd': ['c'], 'g': ['e',
'h'], 'f': ['b', 'c'], 'h': ['e', 'g']} # shall be an adjacence list of
a graph...
self.oha = [('a', 'b'), ('b', 'c'), ('b', 'e'), ('b', 'f'),
('c', 'd'), ('c', 'e'), ('c', 'f'), ('e', 'g'), ('e', 'h'), ('g', 'h')]
def do_stuff(self):
next = self.ho.copy() # HERE!!!

edges = self.oha[:]

next['c'].remove('e')
next['g'].remove('h')
del next['b']
edges.pop(0)
edges.pop(3)
edges.pop(6)

f = bla()
print f.ho
print f.oha

OK, so the two last lines, what surprising thing give me exactly the
long dictionary I defined in __init__.

f.do_stuff()

Now you see that I do nothing with the self.* thingies themselves. So
why in hell do the following two lines give me a different output???

print f.ho
print f.oha

f.oha hasn't changed, but f.ho now lacks the two elements I deleted
from next with the remove() call, while the 'b' array is still there.
Now can anyone please explain me why do_stuff() ha changed the
attributes of the class?? Even the following:

next = {}
for v, e in self.ho.items() :
next[v] = e

, where one can easily see that next does not even have the slightest
connection to f.ho, changes it!! I am completely desparate, because I
would just like to work with the copy of that dictionary, without
deleting the proper one. How can I do such a thing?

Thanks in Advance
Tobias

--
please send any mail to botedesschatten s(at)web(dot)de

Not even the slightest connection is not quite right.

adict = {'a':[1,2,3], 'b':[3,4,5]}
anotherdict = adict.copy()
id(adict['a']) 10410608 id(anotherdict['a']) 10410608
adict['a'] and anotherdict['a'] reference the same list. Try a deep copy.
import copy
a_third_dict = copy.deepcopy(a dict)
a_third_dict {'a': [1, 2, 3], 'b': [3, 4, 5]} id(adict3['a'])

10411984

Duncan

[Duncan Smith]

[snip]

Not even the slightest connection is not quite right.

adict = {'a':[1,2,3], 'b':[3,4,5]}
anotherdict = adict.copy()
id(adict['a']) 10410608 id(anotherdict['a']) 10410608
adict['a'] and anotherdict['a'] reference the same list. Try a deep copy.
import copy
a_third_dict = copy.deepcopy(a dict)
a_third_dict {'a': [1, 2, 3], 'b': [3, 4, 5]} id(adict3['a']) 10411984

Duncan

Of course I shouldn't edit output once I've pasted it. That should be,

id(a_third_dict['a'])

10411984