simultaneous use of JDBC and libpq

[alltest1]

Hi,

I am wondering if it is thread-safe to use both JDBC and libpq
simultaneously.

On a Linux, JDBC is used by Tomcat and libpq is used by a client
software written in C language. So JDBC and libpq are used by two
different programs.
If the same row in the same table is updated (update SQL command)
through libpq and
read (select SQL command) by JDBC, then would it cause a thread problem?
I am not using any transaction, and using just select, update, and
sometimes insert.

I am using PostgreSQL 7.3.6 with pg73jdbc3.jar downloaded and libpq that
came with Redhat Enterprise 3.

Thank you very much in advance.

Bob


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

[Richard Huxton]

alltest1 wrote:

Hi,

I am wondering if it is thread-safe to use both JDBC and libpq
simultaneously.

On a Linux, JDBC is used by Tomcat and libpq is used by a client
software written in C language. So JDBC and libpq are used by two
different programs.
If the same row in the same table is updated (update SQL command)
through libpq and
read (select SQL command) by JDBC, then would it cause a thread problem?
I am not using any transaction, and using just select, update, and
sometimes insert.

There are no threads involved here - Tomcat/client-app will be different
processes, and both have their own connection to the database.

You might need to consider concurrency issues within the database
though, e.g. assume your bank account has $B!r(B100 and TOMCAT is debiting
$B!r(B10 while the other app is crediting $B!r(B15

TOMCAT: SELECT amount FROM bank_accounts WHERE acct_id = 1;
OTHER: SELECT amount FROM bank_accounts WHERE acct_id = 1;
TOMCAT: UPDATE bank_accounts SET amount=90 WHERE acct_id = 1;
OTHER: UPDATE bank_accounts SET amount=115 WHERE acct_id = 1;

Oops - not $B!r(B105 at all. To solve this, you need to lock the table or the
row(s) in question, e.g.
SELECT FOR UPDATE ... WHERE acct_id = 1;]#

See the section on "concurrenc y control" in the manuals for full details.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

[Csaba Nagy]

Yes, it is safe. The JDBC and the libpq app will share nothing between
each other, so there can not be any threading issues between them.
You can only have thread safety issues inside the same application which
uses multiple threads sharing resources between each other.

Cheers,
Csaba.

On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 16:24, alltest1 wrote:

Hi,

I am wondering if it is thread-safe to use both JDBC and libpq
simultaneously.

On a Linux, JDBC is used by Tomcat and libpq is used by a client
software written in C language. So JDBC and libpq are used by two
different programs.
If the same row in the same table is updated (update SQL command)
through libpq and
read (select SQL command) by JDBC, then would it cause a thread problem?
I am not using any transaction, and using just select, update, and
sometimes insert.

I am using PostgreSQL 7.3.6 with pg73jdbc3.jar downloaded and libpq that
came with Redhat Enterprise 3.

Thank you very much in advance.

Bob


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postg resql.org