SuSE RPMs available for PostgreSQL 7.4

[Peter Eisentraut]

SuSE RPMs for PostgreSQL 7.4 are available at

ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/binary/v7.4/suse

or a mirror

http://www.postgresql.org/mirrors-www.html

or at

ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/max/postgresql-7.4

or a mirror

http://www.suse.com/us/private/downl...t_mirrors.html
http://www.suse.com/us/private/downl...m_mirrors.html

--
Peter Eisentraut pe*****@gmx.net
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

[Jan Wieck]

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

SuSE RPMs for PostgreSQL 7.4 are available at

ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/binary/v7.4/suse

or a mirror

http://www.postgresql.org/mirrors-www.html

or at

ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/max/postgresql-7.4
Isn't there a "v" missing here?

or a mirror

http://www.suse.com/us/private/downl...t_mirrors.html
http://www.suse.com/us/private/downl...m_mirrors.html

--
#============== =============== =============== =============== ===========#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#============== =============== =============== ====== Ja******@Yahoo. com #
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

[Lamar Owen]

On Monday 17 November 2003 05:18 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

SuSE RPMs for PostgreSQL 7.4 are available at
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/binary/v7.4/suse

Hey, Peter, for one who consistently complains about lack of consistency in
naming, you completely diregarded the precedent that has previously been set
for naming RPM releases (regardless of the source).

And then you neglected to put group write permissions on the directory so that
other binaries could be uploaded.

So now I wouldn't be able to upload RPMs in the customary place. Many thanks.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
[phone]
www.pari.edu
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddres sHere" to ma*******@postg resql.org)

[Shridhar Daithankar]

Jan Wieck wrote:

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

SuSE RPMs for PostgreSQL 7.4 are available at

ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/binary/v7.4/suse

or a mirror

http://www.postgresql.org/mirrors-www.html

or at

ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/max/postgresql-7.4

Isn't there a "v" missing here?

Not again..

Shridhar
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match

[Peter Eisentraut]

Lamar Owen writes:

Hey, Peter, for one who consistently complains about lack of consistency in
naming, you completely diregarded the precedent that has previously been set
for naming RPM releases (regardless of the source).
These are SuSE RPMs. They were build by SuSE following the conventions
that SuSE has used for their past releases. So who are we to argue with
that?
And then you neglected to put group write permissions on the directory so that
other binaries could be uploaded.
I see

drwxrwxr-x 3 petere pgsql 512 Nov 17 20:47 binary/v7.4/

If someone else put the group write permissions in there in between, I
apologize.
So now I wouldn't be able to upload RPMs in the customary place. Many thanks.

What is the customary place? I'm confused.

--
Peter Eisentraut pe*****@gmx.net
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postg resql.org

[Marc G. Fournier]

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 11:59 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

Lamar Owen writes:

Hey, Peter, for one who consistently complains about lack of consistency
in naming, you completely diregarded the precedent that has previously
been set for naming RPM releases (regardless of the source).

These are SuSE RPMs. They were build by SuSE following the conventions
that SuSE has used for their past releases. So who are we to argue with
that?

The place they were put. The 'customary place' has been
v{version}/RPMS/{distribution} so that they would be in
pub/binary/v7.4/RPMS/suse-{version}. Their source RPM would go there
too. I have no problem with the name of the RPM's themselves, just
where they were put. As long as they don't have a PGDG in the release
tag I'm happy with the package names.

Actually, ummm ... what if I were to upload FreeBSD binaries? I think:

/pub/binary/v7.4/{suse|redhat|fr eebsd|solaris} makes more sense, no?

the RPMS at the top directory made sense when it was only RPMS that were
being provided, but ...

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to ma*******@postg resql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

[Peter Eisentraut]

Lamar Owen writes:

Hey, Peter, for one who consistently complains about lack of consistency in
naming, you completely diregarded the precedent that has previously been set
for naming RPM releases (regardless of the source).
These are SuSE RPMs. They were build by SuSE following the conventions
that SuSE has used for their past releases. So who are we to argue with
that?
And then you neglected to put group write permissions on the directory so that
other binaries could be uploaded.
I see

drwxrwxr-x 3 petere pgsql 512 Nov 17 20:47 binary/v7.4/

If someone else put the group write permissions in there in between, I
apologize.
So now I wouldn't be able to upload RPMs in the customary place. Many thanks.

What is the customary place? I'm confused.

--
Peter Eisentraut pe*****@gmx.net
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postg resql.org

[Marc G. Fournier]

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 11:59 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

Lamar Owen writes:

Hey, Peter, for one who consistently complains about lack of consistency
in naming, you completely diregarded the precedent that has previously
been set for naming RPM releases (regardless of the source).

These are SuSE RPMs. They were build by SuSE following the conventions
that SuSE has used for their past releases. So who are we to argue with
that?

The place they were put. The 'customary place' has been
v{version}/RPMS/{distribution} so that they would be in
pub/binary/v7.4/RPMS/suse-{version}. Their source RPM would go there
too. I have no problem with the name of the RPM's themselves, just
where they were put. As long as they don't have a PGDG in the release
tag I'm happy with the package names.

Actually, ummm ... what if I were to upload FreeBSD binaries? I think:

/pub/binary/v7.4/{suse|redhat|fr eebsd|solaris} makes more sense, no?

the RPMS at the top directory made sense when it was only RPMS that were
being provided, but ...

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to ma*******@postg resql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly