Access private props through ancestor

[rick]

I have a situation where I want to write an extensible class that is
capable of saving / restoring properties of classes derived from it.
A simplified example is explained as follows;-

class A
{
private $Save ;

public function Push()
{
$this->Save = serialize( get_object_vars ( $this ) ) ;
}

public function Pop()
{
foreach( unserialize( $this->Save ) as $Prop =$Value )
$this->$Prop = $Value ;
}
}

class B extends A
{
private $Priv ;

public function SetPriv( $Num )
{
$this->Priv = $Num ;
}

public function GetPriv()
{
return $this->Priv ;
}
}

$C = new B ;
$C->SetPriv( 1 ) ;
$C->Push() ;
$C->SetPriv( 2 ) ;
echo $C->GetPriv()."< br/>\n" ;
$C->Pop() ;
echo $C->GetPriv()."< br/>\n" ;

At the point of the call to $C->Pop(), I get the following error;-

Cannot access private property B::$Priv

It is only private properties which cause this problem, public and
protected properties defined in B will save and restore as intended.

Is there a way around this ?
TIA

[Jerry Stuckle]

ri**@fourfront. ltd.uk wrote:

I have a situation where I want to write an extensible class that is
capable of saving / restoring properties of classes derived from it.
A simplified example is explained as follows;-

class A
{
private $Save ;

public function Push()
{
$this->Save = serialize( get_object_vars ( $this ) ) ;
}

public function Pop()
{
foreach( unserialize( $this->Save ) as $Prop =$Value )
$this->$Prop = $Value ;
}
}

class B extends A
{
private $Priv ;

public function SetPriv( $Num )
{
$this->Priv = $Num ;
}

public function GetPriv()
{
return $this->Priv ;
}
}

$C = new B ;
$C->SetPriv( 1 ) ;
$C->Push() ;
$C->SetPriv( 2 ) ;
echo $C->GetPriv()."< br/>\n" ;
$C->Pop() ;
echo $C->GetPriv()."< br/>\n" ;

At the point of the call to $C->Pop(), I get the following error;-

Cannot access private property B::$Priv

It is only private properties which cause this problem, public and
protected properties defined in B will save and restore as intended.

Is there a way around this ?
TIA

No, that's the purpose of private properties - to hide your implementation.

The correct way to do this would be for B to have its own Push and Pop
functions which save/restore its data, and call the Push and Pop
functions in A to save and restore its data.

--
=============== ===
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
js*******@attgl obal.net
=============== ===

[Schraalhans Keukenmeester]

ri**@fourfront. ltd.uk wrote:

I have a situation where I want to write an extensible class that is
capable of saving / restoring properties of classes derived from it.
A simplified example is explained as follows;-

class A
{
private $Save ;

public function Push()
{
$this->Save = serialize( get_object_vars ( $this ) ) ;
}

public function Pop()
{
foreach( unserialize( $this->Save ) as $Prop =$Value )
$this->$Prop = $Value ;
}
}

class B extends A
{
private $Priv ;

public function SetPriv( $Num )
{
$this->Priv = $Num ;
}

public function GetPriv()
{
return $this->Priv ;
}
}

$C = new B ;
$C->SetPriv( 1 ) ;
$C->Push() ;
$C->SetPriv( 2 ) ;
echo $C->GetPriv()."< br/>\n" ;
$C->Pop() ;
echo $C->GetPriv()."< br/>\n" ;

At the point of the call to $C->Pop(), I get the following error;-

Cannot access private property B::$Priv

It is only private properties which cause this problem, public and
protected properties defined in B will save and restore as intended.

Is there a way around this ?
TIA

If keeping the variable shielded from client code is most important to
you in this particular case, consider leaving them public, write a
custom __get() and __set() accessors and catch attempts at meddling with
$priv there. Not completely 'as it should' but it does the job.

Or define the (protected) variable in the parent class instead and
access it through parent::$priv.

I know protected vars in the parent class ARE visible to its children,
but I haven't got a clue whether this also goes the other way around.

[rick]

On 3 Apr, 01:17, Schraalhans Keukenmeester <bitbuc...@inva lid.spam>
wrote:

>
If keeping the variable shielded from client code is most important to
you in this particular case, consider leaving them public, write a
custom __get() and __set() accessors and catch attempts at meddling with
$priv there. Not completely 'as it should' but it does the job.

What is most important to me is writing a class which can be inherited
by any class in my project - regardless of the type of access levels
of it's properties.

Or define the (protected) variable in the parent class instead and
access it through parent::$priv.

Then the parent class is no longer generic.

I know protected vars in the parent class ARE visible to its children,
but I haven't got a clue whether this also goes the other way around.

Protected variables in the child are visible to and settable by the
parent - it is only the private variables in the child which cause a
problem in this case.
Interestingly, the private variables in the child ARE visible to the
parent - as the Push() function detailed above does successfully save
the serialized details of the child into it's own 'Save' variable.
The problem is only that the Pop function cannot then set the private
variable of the child class.
Surely this behaviour is inconsistent - either the parent can access
private child properties or it can't ?

If anyone can let me know how to write this generic push/pop
functionality that can be inherited by ANY class in my system, please
let me know. This would also be useful for other functionality - i.e.
object caching [having a base caching class that can be inherited by
ANY class to allow the class to fully handle it's own caching
automatically].