We are upgrading from VS2003 to 2005. We discovered that the XSD
generated in 2005 (.Net 2.0) is not compatible with what was generated
in 2003 (.Net 1.1), and this breaks our code, as we have serveral
modules that read the XSD file and are sensitive to its structure.
In particular, when you add a SQL server table to a VS2005 project,
the XSD file that is created now has many new annotations such as
msprop:.... I understand these are used by VS2005 to control the .cs
code that is created for the typed dataset. In addition field
attributes are now represented by a sequence. For us these simply
create a problem.
My question is if we can disable the annotations or control somehow
the XSD created so as to create a VS2003 (.Net 1.1) compatible scheme,
or better yet one that is interoperable, w/o anyMS/.NET extensions.
Thanks,
-- Shaul
3  3245 
"Shaul Dar" <sh******@gmail .comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ r19g2000prf.goo glegroups.com.. .
We are upgrading from VS2003 to 2005. We discovered that the XSD
generated in 2005 (.Net 2.0) is not compatible with what was generated
in 2003 (.Net 1.1), and this breaks our code, as we have serveral
modules that read the XSD file and are sensitive to its structure.
In particular, when you add a SQL server table to a VS2005 project,
the XSD file that is created now has many new annotations such as
msprop:.... I understand these are used by VS2005 to control the .cs
code that is created for the typed dataset. In addition field
attributes are now represented by a sequence. For us these simply
create a problem.
My question is if we can disable the annotations or control somehow
the XSD created so as to create a VS2003 (.Net 1.1) compatible scheme,
or better yet one that is interoperable, w/o anyMS/.NET extensions.
What errors are your modules producing?
Any program reading an XSD file should be ignoring attributes in namespaces
it does not understand. The "msprop" attributes are an example of what these
other modules should be ignoring.
--
John Saunders [MVP]
On Jun 12, 3:39 pm, "John Saunders [MVP]" <john.saunder s at
trizetto.comwro te:
"ShaulDar" <shaul...@gmail .comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ r19g2000prf.goo glegroups.com.. .
We are upgrading from VS2003 to 2005. We discovered that theXSD
generated in 2005 (.Net 2.0) is not compatible with what was generated
in 2003 (.Net 1.1), and this breaks our code, as we have serveral
modules that read theXSDfile and are sensitive to its structure.
In particular, when you add a SQL server table to aVS2005project,
theXSDfile that is created now has many new annotations such as
msprop:.... I understand these are used byVS2005to control the .cs
code that is created for the typed dataset. In addition field
attributes are now represented by a sequence. For us these simply
create a problem.
My question is if we can disable the annotations or control somehow
theXSDcreated so as to create a VS2003 (.Net 1.1) compatible scheme,
or better yet one that is interoperable, w/o anyMS/.NET extensions.
What errors are your modules producing?
Any program reading anXSDfile should be ignoring attributes in namespaces
it does not understand. The "msprop" attributes are an example of what these
other modules should be ignoring.
--
John Saunders [MVP]
Our modules currently are sensitive to the extra info (e.g. we create
XSLT transformations based the XSD, for example to take an XML data
file and create PDF or HTML presentations from it). Yes we could
invest non-trivial work to make them ignore the changes (or apply
another transformation to remove them). But to repeat my question,
can't we have VS2005 emit the same XSD as it did in 2003, or to emit
"clean" W3C standard XSD w/o all the MS annotations?
-- Shaul
"Shaul Dar" <sh******@gmail .comwrote in message
news:11******** *************@r 19g2000prf.goog legroups.com...
On Jun 12, 3:39 pm, "John Saunders [MVP]" <john.saunder s at
trizetto.comwro te:
>"ShaulDar" <shaul...@gmail .comwrote in message
news:11******* *************** @r19g2000prf.go oglegroups.com. ..
We are upgrading from VS2003 to 2005. We discovered that theXSD
generated in 2005 (.Net 2.0) is not compatible with what was generated
in 2003 (.Net 1.1), and this breaks our code, as we have serveral
modules that read theXSDfile and are sensitive to its structure.
In particular, when you add a SQL server table to aVS2005project,
theXSDfile that is created now has many new annotations such as
msprop:.... I understand these are used byVS2005to control the .cs
code that is created for the typed dataset. In addition field
attributes are now represented by a sequence. For us these simply
create a problem.
My question is if we can disable the annotations or control somehow
theXSDcreated so as to create a VS2003 (.Net 1.1) compatible scheme,
or better yet one that is interoperable, w/o anyMS/.NET extensions.
What errors are your modules producing?
Any program reading anXSDfile should be ignoring attributes in namespaces
it does not understand. The "msprop" attributes are an example of what
these
other modules should be ignoring.
--
John Saunders [MVP]
Our modules currently are sensitive to the extra info (e.g. we create
XSLT transformations based the XSD, for example to take an XML data
file and create PDF or HTML presentations from it). Yes we could
invest non-trivial work to make them ignore the changes (or apply
another transformation to remove them). But to repeat my question,
can't we have VS2005 emit the same XSD as it did in 2003, or to emit
"clean" W3C standard XSD w/o all the MS annotations?
This _is_ clean, W3C standard XSD. The standard permits attributes from
other namespaces to appear. Your transform should not be processing
attributes from namespaces it doesn't know about. The effort to fix it might
be trivial. I don't have time to test this now, but how about just adding a
template that matches the MS attributes and does nothing? The rest of your
stylesheets wouldn't need to change.
--
John Saunders [MVP] This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: craigkenisston |
last post by:
Using VS2005 to create an application compatible with framework 1.1
Is this possible ?
I like the VS2005 IDE a lot much more than VS2003, however, I'm
creating a library that needs to be compatible with frm 1.1.
At the begining, I started to use the VS2005 IDE and I thought it could
not be a problem, however, when I recreated a project with VS2003 and
joined all the pieces I found that I was using stuff not available
before, though I...
|
by: -DG- |
last post by:
No reply on my previous query, so I'll post this again. I've done a
bit more research in the interim.
I'm trying to find an easy way to port code from the older VS2003
format to the format used in VS2005. VS2005 uses partial classes to
split off the compiler-generated sections of forms. It keeps the
editable files uncluttered.
I generated very simple projects with VS2003 and with VS2005 to
compare the output. Following are...
|
by: Darrin |
last post by:
Hello,
I see that VS2005 and the new framework 2.0 is out to the public now.
Wondering about some things.
When you install the new framework 2.0 can a person still use visual studio
2003 or do you need to use Visual Studio 2005?
If you can use the new framework 2.0 with VS2003 are there any benifits?
|
by: Frank Rizzo |
last post by:
Is it me or is the speed of VS2005 actually slower than VS2003?
The startup is pretty bad - even though I changed VS to display an empty
environment. When I create a new form and want to change its size:
while I am resizing, an hour glass comes up for a few seconds.
There a lot of other slowdowns all over the system. It seems like it the
hard drive kicks in really hard.
Now I did have the VS2005 beta installed, but I uninstalled it...
|
by: Carlo \(MCP only\) |
last post by:
Hi to all
I'm askyng you a suggestion about the best way to share the same source code
between VS2003 and VS2005.
The project I'm developing is a controls and components library, and the
Solution.sln includes a standard WindowsForms application for testing
pourposes.
What I need is an efficient and reliable way to edit and test the DLL
assembly in both environments, since the library will be distributed for
Framework 1.1 and 2.0.
| | |
by: DrZogg |
last post by:
It can't be... say it isn't so...
Yes.. there is a fly in the ointment
This bug requires 3 projects... yes this is a real world production
issue not some tinker toy thing.
Start with a C# interface assembly we will call Interfaces
namespace Interfaces
{
|
by: Tammam |
last post by:
Hello All,
I had a solution composed of managed/unmanaged C++ , C# projects. It builds
with no problem in VS2003 but after converting the solution to VS2005 i get
many linking errors such as LNK2020 LNK2028. Below is a little bit of the
error report.
Error 34 error LNK2020: unresolved token (0A000029) "public: __thiscall
std::_Container_base::_Container_base(void)"
(??0_Container_base@std@@$$FQAE@XZ) UnmanagedResiprocateController.obj
|
by: Tony Girgenti |
last post by:
Hello.
I developed a VS.NET2003(VB), ASP.NET web application client program with
..NET Framework 1.1, ASP.NET 1.1, IIS 5.1 and WSE 2.0.
I tried to migrate it to VS 2005 Pro(VB), Web Application Projects, .NET
Framework 2.0, ASP.NET 2.0, IIS 5.1, WSE ?.
Is WSE 3.0 required for VS 2005?
|
by: Squishy |
last post by:
I tried installing my VS2005 Pro on Vista Ultimate 32 bit RTM today and got
errors stating that VS2005 was not compatible with Vista.
Microsoft......please pull your finger out of my ass and tell me this is a
joke.
It must be a joke....because I also have read that VS2002 and VS2003 will
not be supported on Vista. This clearly violates Microsoft's own terms of
support for these products.
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
| | |
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| | |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |
