473,804 Members | 2,085 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Q: .Net Framework - Upgrade v1.1 to v2.0 or skip v1.1 altogether ?

Hi.

I've been looking high and low, but nowhere is this simple question
answered...

This concerns .NET Framework v1.1 vs. v2.0.

Does .NET Framework v2.0 include v1.1, + SP1, + post-SP1 bug fixes/new
features (*); or are they two separate applications that perform the
same job? (**)

*: like a Windows SP2 would contain SP1, plus post-SP1 bug fixes/new
features

**: like MS' and Sun's JVM
If .NET v2.0 is [presumably] better than 1.1, can I simply skip v1.1
and install only v2.0, or is that not advisable? I read that they can
both coexist, which seems to indicate that v2.0 is not [really] and
update to v1.1

I find this very confusing, as Microsoft's .NET Framework dowload page
doesn't list v1.1 as a prerequisite.

PS: I'm not talking about the SDK here, just the runtime.
Please don't flame me if the answer already exists, just point me to
it.
Or better yet, post the answer in this thread. ;)
Thanks!

PS: email is a decoy.
==

May 21 '06 #1
5 1601
HI,

How could it 2.0 compatible to 1.1 withouth what you ask.(It has to be it is
not but that is because there are corrected not registrated and described
bugs in previous versions) ,

I hope this helps,

Cor
<x9*********@ho tmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:11******** *************@g 10g2000cwb.goog legroups.com...
Hi.

I've been looking high and low, but nowhere is this simple question
answered...

This concerns .NET Framework v1.1 vs. v2.0.

Does .NET Framework v2.0 include v1.1, + SP1, + post-SP1 bug fixes/new
features (*); or are they two separate applications that perform the
same job? (**)

*: like a Windows SP2 would contain SP1, plus post-SP1 bug fixes/new
features

**: like MS' and Sun's JVM
If .NET v2.0 is [presumably] better than 1.1, can I simply skip v1.1
and install only v2.0, or is that not advisable? I read that they can
both coexist, which seems to indicate that v2.0 is not [really] and
update to v1.1

I find this very confusing, as Microsoft's .NET Framework dowload page
doesn't list v1.1 as a prerequisite.

PS: I'm not talking about the SDK here, just the runtime.
Please don't flame me if the answer already exists, just point me to
it.
Or better yet, post the answer in this thread. ;)
Thanks!

PS: email is a decoy.
==

May 21 '06 #2
Cor,

I don't really understand your answer.

If you mean that 1.1 and 2.0 have to be compatible at some level, of
course that should be so.

My question is:

Can 2.0 be installed without 1.1 (does 2.0 contain all of 1.1, plus
updates)...
Or are both required?

In the case of Java for example, some sites still use the JVM from
Microsoft; some others only Sun's; and some other sites use whichever
is installed. But for maximum functionality, it is still customary to
install both.
Anyway, I don't see how I can make my question any clearer...

M.T.
Cor Ligthert [MVP] wrote:
HI,

How could it 2.0 compatible to 1.1 withouth what you ask.(It has to be it is
not but that is because there are corrected not registrated and described
bugs in previous versions) ,

I hope this helps,

Cor
<x9*********@ho tmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:11******** *************@g 10g2000cwb.goog legroups.com...
Hi.

I've been looking high and low, but nowhere is this simple question
answered...

This concerns .NET Framework v1.1 vs. v2.0.

Does .NET Framework v2.0 include v1.1, + SP1, + post-SP1 bug fixes/new
features (*); or are they two separate applications that perform the
same job? (**)

*: like a Windows SP2 would contain SP1, plus post-SP1 bug fixes/new
features

**: like MS' and Sun's JVM
If .NET v2.0 is [presumably] better than 1.1, can I simply skip v1.1
and install only v2.0, or is that not advisable? I read that they can
both coexist, which seems to indicate that v2.0 is not [really] and
update to v1.1

I find this very confusing, as Microsoft's .NET Framework dowload page
doesn't list v1.1 as a prerequisite.

PS: I'm not talking about the SDK here, just the runtime.
Please don't flame me if the answer already exists, just point me to
it.
Or better yet, post the answer in this thread. ;)
Thanks!

PS: email is a decoy.
==


May 21 '06 #3
2.0 should have all parts that are in the previous versions.

I did nowhere write "some level" so why are you telling that I did?.

Because of some bugs at the moment you can install both. Surely as long as
SP1 is not there, however normally this should not have been needed.

In a normal situation there should only be one NET Framework on a computer.
But as I said because of some bugs I would not do that now.

(This for endusers for developing are different rules. Visual Studio uses
always the Framework from the same version)

Cor

<x9*********@ho tmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:11******** **************@ j33g2000cwa.goo glegroups.com.. .
Cor,

I don't really understand your answer.

If you mean that 1.1 and 2.0 have to be compatible at some level, of
course that should be so.

My question is:

Can 2.0 be installed without 1.1 (does 2.0 contain all of 1.1, plus
updates)...
Or are both required?

In the case of Java for example, some sites still use the JVM from
Microsoft; some others only Sun's; and some other sites use whichever
is installed. But for maximum functionality, it is still customary to
install both.
Anyway, I don't see how I can make my question any clearer...

M.T.
Cor Ligthert [MVP] wrote:
HI,

How could it 2.0 compatible to 1.1 withouth what you ask.(It has to be it
is
not but that is because there are corrected not registrated and described
bugs in previous versions) ,

I hope this helps,

Cor
<x9*********@ho tmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:11******** *************@g 10g2000cwb.goog legroups.com...
> Hi.
>
> I've been looking high and low, but nowhere is this simple question
> answered...
>
> This concerns .NET Framework v1.1 vs. v2.0.
>
> Does .NET Framework v2.0 include v1.1, + SP1, + post-SP1 bug fixes/new
> features (*); or are they two separate applications that perform the
> same job? (**)
>
> *: like a Windows SP2 would contain SP1, plus post-SP1 bug fixes/new
> features
>
> **: like MS' and Sun's JVM
>
>
> If .NET v2.0 is [presumably] better than 1.1, can I simply skip v1.1
> and install only v2.0, or is that not advisable? I read that they can
> both coexist, which seems to indicate that v2.0 is not [really] and
> update to v1.1
>
> I find this very confusing, as Microsoft's .NET Framework dowload page
> doesn't list v1.1 as a prerequisite.
>
> PS: I'm not talking about the SDK here, just the runtime.
>
>
> Please don't flame me if the answer already exists, just point me to
> it.
> Or better yet, post the answer in this thread. ;)
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> PS: email is a decoy.
> ==
>

May 21 '06 #4
V1.1 and V2.0 are separate. V2.0 is new and can be installed on the
same machine with V1.1, but v2.0 is not just a combination ov v1.1 plus
service packs. In fact, there are no service packs to version 1.1 to
my knowledge.

You can install v2.0 without installing v1.1. You only need v1.1 if
you have apps that are compiled against that version and you still need
to maintain them. Apps converted from v1.1 to v2.0 will probably
require some changes to accomodate new features, but it should be
fairly painless. This, of course, is dependent on the individual app
in question.

If you use VS2005, then you must have v2.0 as it only compiles for
v2.0.

Hope this helps

May 22 '06 #5
That's exactly what I wanted to know.

Thanks Chris!

M.T.
Chris Dunaway wrote:
V1.1 and V2.0 are separate. V2.0 is new and can be installed on the
same machine with V1.1, but v2.0 is not just a combination ov v1.1 plus
service packs. In fact, there are no service packs to version 1.1 to
my knowledge.

You can install v2.0 without installing v1.1. You only need v1.1 if
you have apps that are compiled against that version and you still need
to maintain them. Apps converted from v1.1 to v2.0 will probably
require some changes to accomodate new features, but it should be
fairly painless. This, of course, is dependent on the individual app
in question.

If you use VS2005, then you must have v2.0 as it only compiles for
v2.0.

Hope this helps


May 25 '06 #6

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

2
3656
by: S P Arif Sahari Wibowo | last post by:
Hi! Is there anyway to get object tag in MSIE to include a page from other URI (as in HTML4 standard)? That is, similar to what iframe tag do. If it is not possible, is there anyway to set the object tag so MSIE skip / ignore object tag altogether and instead render the content of the object structure (between opening and closing tag)?
1
2527
by: Asad Khan | last post by:
Hi, I have Visual Studio 2002 Enterprise Architecture Edition. I was wondering if anyone has any information on how I can develop applications for .Net Compact Framework using this IDE. I've heard Visual Studio 2003 ships with the functionality for .Net Compact Framework development. But right now I have Visual Studio 2002. Is there anything I can do? (Other than the obvious upgrade to 2003). I've heard some beta version of .Net Compact...
2
7117
by: fripper | last post by:
I have installed Visual Studio .Net 2003 on top of an earlier version. Now, when I open a new project I get a message that says Visual Studio .NET has detected that the web server is running ASP.NET version 1.0 ... it goes on to say that I can create the project to be compliant with version 1.0 but that the application will not be able to use the newer features of ASP .NET 1.1. Now, having installed VS .Net 2003 I understand that I have...
1
1678
by: Basil Parmesan | last post by:
After installing the IE SP2 upgrade in late August, I attempted to install the .NET Framework security patches recommed by the Microsoft Upgrade site. I get all types of error messages, basically saying that I can't uninstall the existing versions or upgrade to the newer version. Microsoft support engineers have been sending me utility files, looking at my hard drive files, etc. without success since early September. The latest...
2
3666
by: ecomputerdelicacy | last post by:
Compact Framework SP3 (and I think also SP2 and SP1) XmlTextReader does not handle !DOCTYPE and (maybe?) rdf elements. How can I get the XmlTextReader to read these without issuing a NotSupportedException? Or at least to get past these elements (and nested elements) with an Skip()? I've tried setting xtr.XmlResolver = null; but it doesn't change the functionality. I'm still getting the exception. In a recent MSDN MVP Chat, I was pointed...
6
2084
by: Joseph Geretz | last post by:
I recently upgraded my server to Windows 2003. The first thing I noticed is that my sample WebService pages no longer worked. The Invoke test button is missing. This is addresed by the following KB article: Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 819267 INFO: HTTP GET and HTTP POST Are Disabled by Default http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;819267 The article advises that a new block be inserted into Web.config (or into
23
1935
by: Nak | last post by:
Hi there, Has anyone any ideas if the next Framework will be an update to version 1.1 or another completely new install so that people have 3 Frameworks on their system? And can VS.NET 2003 be set to use any Framework other than 1.1? Nick. --
1
2718
by: SP | last post by:
I have a web service application which uses 3rd party assemblies. I recently upgraded my solution to use .NET Framework 2.0 instead of .NET Framework 1.1. The 3rd party assemblies that I refer are built on .NET Framework 1.1 (but they are supposed to work under .NET Framework 2.0) Since upgrading the solution, I get an error saying : System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: Server was unable to process request....
17
2610
by: Peter Anthony | last post by:
Can the 3.5 version of .NET Framework (currently Beta 2) be installed on pre-Vista machines? Or is it Vista-only? And, why doesn't .NET Framework come pre-installed with the operating system? I think one of the main reasons people will reject such software is having to install something first. I understand it might need upgrading, but why do Windows machines come without any .NET Framework (or am I wrong about this)? It seems that...
0
9716
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
0
9595
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
1
10359
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
0
10101
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
0
6870
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
0
5675
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
1
4314
by: 6302768590 | last post by:
Hai team i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
2
3837
muto222
by: muto222 | last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
3
3005
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.