I am trying to write a web page where a person can click on a word document
and MS Word is launched instead of the document being displayed in the IE
browser. I have been able to launch MS Word but only when I create a
shortcut for the document. However a pop-up comes up with save and/or open
instructions. I do not want the pop-up to come up.
Mike 17 6269
Mike wrote: I am trying to write a web page where a person can click on a word document and MS Word is launched instead of the document being displayed in the IE browser.
This is discussed in the FAQ:
<URL:http://www.htmlhelp.org/faq/html/media.html#force-download>
--
Jim Dabell
"Mike" <di****@cfl.rr.com> wrote: I am trying to write a web page where a person can click on a word document and MS Word is launched instead of the document being displayed in the IE browser.
Word and other proprietary document formats do not belong on the web.
Headless
--
Email and usenet filter list: http://www.headless.dna.ie/usenet.htm
In article <7f********************************@4ax.com>, one of infinite monkeys
at the keyboard of Headless <in*************@dna.ie> wrote: I am trying to write a web page where a person can click on a word document and MS Word is launched instead of the document being displayed in the IE browser.
Word and other proprietary document formats do not belong on the web.
Of course they do! Any document format is welcome on the Web.
Though of course it's only polite to warn the user when a link is
to a proprietary document type.
As to the original question - it's a browser configuration option.
But opening Word documents automatically is a big security hole,
so it would be a very bad idea to enable it.
--
Nick Kew
In urgent need of paying work - see http://www.webthing.com/~nick/cv.html
Nick Kew wrote: Word and other proprietary document formats do not belong on the web.
Of course they do! Any document format is welcome on the Web.
I strongly disagree, content on the WWW should be accessible. That means
no closed, proprietary or license restricted formats like Word, Flash,
Windows Media, Real Media, Excel, Acrobat etc.
Headless
--
Email and usenet filter list: http://www.headless.dna.ie/usenet.htm
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:51:24 +0100, Headless <in*************@dna.ie>
wrote: Nick Kew wrote:
Word and other proprietary document formats do not belong on the web.
Of course they do! Any document format is welcome on the Web.
I strongly disagree, content on the WWW should be accessible. That means no closed, proprietary or license restricted formats like Word, Flash, Windows Media, Real Media, Excel, Acrobat etc.
Yes and no. There is nothing wrong with proprietary formats on the web
provided one of the following is true:
- they are used for decoration only, or
- alternative content is provided, or
- there is no reasonable alternative.
I gather for example that Windows Media files are typically quite a lot
smaller than their MPEG equivalents (if that's wrong please correct me)
so it makes sense to provide to provide WM for those that can use it and
MPEG for everyone else.
If someone thinks that some of their readers can usefully use a Word
document, then they should provide a Word document - but also an HTML or
plain text version for non-Word users. (Having said that, it's true that
a lot of the Word documents on the web seem to be there for no very good
reason.)
--
Stephen Poley http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpoley/webmatters/
Headless wrote: "Mike" <di****@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
I am trying to write a web page where a person can click on a word document and MS Word is launched instead of the document being displayed in the IE browser.
Word and other proprietary document formats do not belong on the web.
So, the RealMedia files on <http://www.headless.dna.ie/dlvc.htm> are all
open formats? Or does your rule only apply to "documents" ?
Matthias
Matthias Gutfeldt wrote: So, the RealMedia files on <http://www.headless.dna.ie/dlvc.htm> are all open formats? Or does your rule only apply to "documents" ?
A thorn in my side I can assure you. The Realmedia clips have been made
by someone else, I don't have access to the source material (and I lack
the hardware to process it).
That leaves me with the choice of not providing anything, or (cringe)
use the Realmedia files. As you can see, I've chosen the latter for now.
The audio files on the site have recently been converted to Ogg Vorbis,
this was done despite the fact that it will inconvenience users (I used
to offer both MP3Pro and WMA samples).
I was able to switch to Ogg Vorbis because I have access to the source
audio files, and I have soft/hardware capable of processing them.
Headless
--
Email and usenet filter list: http://www.headless.dna.ie/usenet.htm
In message <f3********************************@4ax.com>, Headless
<in*************@dna.ie> writes Nick Kew wrote:
Word and other proprietary document formats do not belong on the web. Of course they do! Any document format is welcome on the Web.
I strongly disagree, content on the WWW should be accessible. That means no closed, proprietary or license restricted formats like Word, Flash, Windows Media, Real Media, Excel, Acrobat etc.
Nothing wrong with making files in a propriety format like Acrobat
available, so long as an 'accessible' version (HTML) is also offered as
a fall-back.
As for Real, I don't think that I know of a streaming format that
provides such a compact form and multi-audience capability -- and with a
readily available free viewer.
regards Headless
--
Jake
jake wrote: I strongly disagree, content on the WWW should be accessible. That means no closed, proprietary or license restricted formats like Word, Flash, Windows Media, Real Media, Excel, Acrobat etc. Nothing wrong with making files in a propriety format like Acrobat available, so long as an 'accessible' version (HTML) is also offered as a fall-back.
The HTML version is all you need, one version that works for everyone.
As for Real, I don't think that I know of a streaming format that provides such a compact form and multi-audience capability -- and with a readily available free viewer.
According to that logic content/services should be made available using
techniques unique to MSIE like ActiveX (multi-audience capability -- and
with a readily available free viewer). As for compactness, Realmedia
certainly does not do better than MPEG-4.
Headless
--
Email and usenet filter list: http://www.headless.dna.ie/usenet.htm
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 10:38:19 +0100, Headless <me@privacy.net> wrote: Stephen Poley wrote:
I strongly disagree, content on the WWW should be accessible. That means no closed, proprietary or license restricted formats like Word, Flash, Windows Media, Real Media, Excel, Acrobat etc. Yes and no. There is nothing wrong with proprietary formats on the web provided one of the following is true: - they are used for decoration only, or
Content cannot be decorative imo, for example a site can use audio or video as non essential additional fluff, but it's still content.
A question of defining terms, I suppose. In the way I usually use the
term (and have sometimes seen others use the term) "non essential
additional fluff" is decoration. But it doesn't really matter what you
call it - you can happily use a proprietary format for 'fluff', since
it doesn't really matter whether the reader sees/hears it or not. - there is no reasonable alternative.
Which rarely applies to Word documents
Agreed. This comment was directed to proprietary formats in general. I
dare say there are some technical areas where there is no alternative to
using a particular proprietary format. I gather for example that Windows Media files are typically quite a lot smaller than their MPEG equivalents (if that's wrong please correct me)
MPEG video comes in a number of variants; MPEG-1: this format is rather old and not very efficient. MPEG-2: not suited to internet usage (DVD's use MPEG-2). MPEG-4: Window Media is a closed proprietary implementation of MPEG-4, there are other implementations of MPEG-4 which are open, they achieve similar quality/byte results.
Thanks. Are there now open MPEG-4 implementations for near enough all
platforms? I seem to recall reading that only MPEG-1 is available for
some platforms, but that could well be out-of-date info now.
But the general principle holds: there may be an open format for certain
information, but also a proprietary format which is superior for those
readers who can handle it. In which case the best solution is to provide
both. If someone thinks that some of their readers can usefully use a Word document, then they should provide a Word document - but also an HTML or plain text version for non-Word users.
Provide an accessible version first, needless to say that HTML is preferred in most cases, if the content is intended to be imported into a word processor then RTF is the accessible word processor independent way to publish content.
Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be as reliable as one would like - I
have more than once hit problems using it to transfer information
between different word-processors. And it doesn't support several of the
later Word features (though if you want to tell me that those features
are mostly 'non essential additional fluff' I won't actually argue with
you.)
Many of us are fierce proponents of accessability when it comes to textual content. I believe that the same attitude should extend to all forms of content. Increasingly the web will be extended with other than textual content.
Agreed. But I feel that one should ensure proprietary formats are used
appropriately, and not prohibit them altogether.
--
Stephen Poley http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpoley/webmatters/
jake wrote: The HTML version is all you need, one version that works for everyone. Not really. An Acrobat version will be used to deliver text and graphical information in a form and to a precision that is simply not possible as HTML. Acrobat has established itself as the de-facto format for distribution of precision-formatted documents (although mainly as a cross-platform print document).
Precision-formatted document = View as the author intended. I thought by
now we had dispelled that illusion. There is no such thing for computer
files. The display, whether intended for the screen or printer, cannot
be "controlled". You have no control over the window size of a UA, or
the user's preferred paper size, font preference, portrait/landscape
orientation etc.
If you want to distribute as one file (html and dependencies), then
there are options for that also. As for Real, I don't think that I know of a streaming format that provides such a compact form and multi-audience capability -- and with a readily available free viewer.
According to that logic content/services should be made available using techniques unique to MSIE like ActiveX (multi-audience capability -- and with a readily available free viewer). As for compactness, Realmedia certainly does not do better than MPEG-4.
Real is pretty much a cross-platform product, as with Quicktime.
The "coverage" of Real and Quicktime would be comparable to IE.
Anyway, can you give me a pointer to a MPEG-4 file that demonstrates this property? It hasn't been my experience to-date, but you can probably show me the errors of my way ;-)
DivX, Windows Media and others, the quality/byte differences are fairly
minimal.
Headless
--
Email and usenet filter list: http://www.headless.dna.ie/usenet.htm
Headless wrote: The "coverage" of Real and Quicktime would be comparable to IE.
I take that back actually, a section of my webstats pretty much tells
the story:
1.Shockwave Flash 86.5 %
2.Dynamic HTML Binding 78.4 %
3.Windows Media Services 62.2 %
4.Shockwave for Director 18.9 %
5.No plug-ins measured 10.8 %
6.QuickTime 8.1 %
7.RealPlayer 5.4 %
Needles to say that these types of stats are not quite reliable, but
both RealPlayer and Quicktime are going the way of Netscape for sure.
Headless
--
Email and usenet filter list: http://www.headless.dna.ie/usenet.htm
jake wrote: Nothing wrong with making files in a propriety format like Acrobat available, so long as an 'accessible' version (HTML) is also offered as a fall-back.
The HTML version is all you need, one version that works for everyone.
Not really. An Acrobat version will be used to deliver text and graphical information in a form and to a precision that is simply not possible as HTML.
e.g., useful to provide formatting guidelines for papers. See
< http://www.umass.edu/history/links_writing.html > As for Real, I don't think that I know of a streaming format that provides such a compact form and multi-audience capability -- and with a readily available free viewer.
One site for a radio program says it uses Real Audio for copyright
reasons. The program airs material from freelance producers who
retain the copyright to their material. Real Audio allows the program
to be heard via the web, without the possibility of users saving the
program and redistributing it. Or so they claim. It does seem to me
that there would be a way to save a Real Audio stream if one were
determined. But I know little of such things.
--
Brian
follow the directions in my address to email me
I should have explained myself better. Although I am creating a web page,
it is for internal use by only six workers. What I want to do is place all
our forms in the drive and use a web page to exibit them. All a worker
needing a form would have to do is click on the form and have it open in
word.
"Daniel R. Tobias" <da*@tobias.name> wrote in message
news:mX*********************@news2.news.adelphia.n et... Mike wrote: I am trying to write a web page where a person can click on a word
document and MS Word is launched instead of the document being displayed in the
IE browser. I have been able to launch MS Word but only when I create a shortcut for the document. However a pop-up comes up with save and/or
open instructions. I do not want the pop-up to come up.
You have no control over what users' browsers do when confronted with a particular kind of data; and what makes you think they're all using IE, anyway? (Some of your users might be using a *decent* browser, like Mozilla, instead.) The best you can do is ensure that a proper MIME type is sent to correctly announce the data type you're sending, and then it's up to the browser (and whatever helper apps, plugins, etc., are configured in it) to decide what to do with it. Generally, a potentially dangerous format (like MS Word, which can have macro viruses/worms) ought to involve some warning to the user of what it's about to do rather than just loading an application right away, so the popup you mention is a reasonable browser behavior.
In the case of MSIE, due to its MIME-type second-guessing, you can't actually be sure that it will behave consistently based on what you announce your data to be (it might decide to fire up MS Word for your document even if you change its MIME type to application/octet-stream to try to "force" a download), but more standards-compliant browsers will honor the type you set, allowing more site author influence on the browser's behavior, though what the browser does is still in the end the choice of its user via configuration settings.
-- == Dan == Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/ Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/ Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
In article <8m7%a.117182$cF.32547@rwcrnsc53>,
Brian <us*****@mangymutt.com.invalid-remove-this-part> wrote: As for Real, I don't think that I know of a streaming format that provides such a compact form and multi-audience capability -- and with a readily available free viewer.
One site for a radio program says it uses Real Audio for copyright reasons. The program airs material from freelance producers who retain the copyright to their material. Real Audio allows the program to be heard via the web, without the possibility of users saving the program and redistributing it. Or so they claim. It does seem to me that there would be a way to save a Real Audio stream if one were determined. But I know little of such things.
Just record the output to your speakers.
--
Kris kr*******@xs4all.netherlands (nl)
"We called him Tortoise because he taught us" said the Mock Turtle.
Brian wrote: Real Audio allows the program to be heard via the web, without the possibility of users saving the program and redistributing it. Or so they claim. It does seem to me that there would be a way to save a Real Audio stream if one were determined.
I think it took me three minutes on google to find a virtual loopback cable.
Its a little bit of software which when run launches real player and
records the stream to a .wav file.
--
David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/
Headless wrote: That's a tricky question to answer as MPEG-4 comes in many guises, some highly proprietary (MS Media), some less proprietary (DivX), and some fully open (the name eludes me, but it's made by someone who used to be in the DivX camp, but he left due to their intentions to make it more proprietary).
I think you might be thinking of XVid, google could probably confirm but my
ISP is playing silly whatsites and I can't make a connection to most sites. Agreed. But I feel that one should ensure proprietary formats are used appropriately, and not prohibit them altogether.
Prohibit is not an option, but accessible formats should be strongly encouraged imo.
Especially if technically superior, and of course there is nothing stopping
people from providing the same content in both Ogg Vorbis and Real Media
formats.
--
David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/ This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Andy |
last post by:
Is there any way for an ASPX page to start WORD, then wait for the user to
finish, then continue running the ASPX.
My situation is -
User selects a file to edit
System should launch word,
User...
|
by: selen |
last post by:
Hello,
My problem is that: I want to open a word document and writing something in
it then save it.But it give me granting access error.and say that:To grant
ASP.NET write access to a file,...
|
by: Zeke |
last post by:
I'm using the following code to create word document but the problem is if
you go to task manager you'll see a WINWORD.EXE process is running but not
the application, here is the code:
...
|
by: Howard Kaikow |
last post by:
MSFT KB article 302896 includes a step by step example demonstrating how to
build an Office COM in VB .NET,
Yesterday, I implemented the example and it works correctly when starting
each of the...
|
by: SivaSiva |
last post by:
Hi,
I'm getting the following error when I try convert a word document using
asp.net.
Application Event Log :
Detection of product '{90110409-6000-11D3-8CFE-0150048383C9}', feature...
| |
by: Thomas Beyerlein |
last post by:
I am trying to open word with process.start but when it opens word it
give me a error that says:
Word experienced an error
Try suggestions:
* check the file permissions
* Make sure there is...
|
by: Edgardo |
last post by:
I hope I'm in the correct forum for this, as the problem is hard to categorize.
I have a VS 2005 asp.net application that invokes Word 2003 to opean and
read a word document. the aplication have...
|
by: giladp1 |
last post by:
I found Albert Kallal's great "Super easy Word Merge" code in his site
at:
http://www.members.shaw.ca/AlbertKallal/msaccess/msaccess.html
Thanks Albert so much for sharing this.
I am looking...
|
by: ajester |
last post by:
I need WinWord to look like it's being executed from the correct path: C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office12\WinWord.exe when in reality it's being launch from a Java app using the path...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
| |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The...
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated ...
| |
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |