textarea not geeting its focus in mozilla

[Prasad]

HI all,

<!-- ======== This is the division with width & height set to 100% and
z-index to -1 =======- -->
<div
style='position:relative;left:0px;top:0px;width:10 0%;height:100%;z-index:-1;overflow:auto'>

</div>
<!-- ======== end of div =======- -->

<!-- ======== This is the division placed at ( 200,20 ) which contains
a textarea with z-index 3 =======- -->
<div style='position:absolute;top:20px;left:200px;borde r:2px solid
red;'>
<textarea style='z-index:3'></textarea>
</div>
<!-- ======== end of div =======- -->

With the above code in mozilla ...................
when i click in textarea , its not getting the focus but still i can
type in..Why i am not getting the focus here though i set the z-index
to 3 (greater than that of first division ).

It works fine in IE ..............................................

what could be the problem ..

how can i make the textarea to get the focus??

please help me out ..

thanx in advance

[Jukka K. Korpela]

Scripsit Prasad:

please help me out ..

Please start behaving: don't multipost. Multiposting is bad. I'm so sorry I
wasted bandwidth by answering one of your questions in c.i.w.a.html, since
multiposters seldom learn from useful answers, but maybe someone else will
benefit from the reply.

Oh, and in any complicated matter related to www authoring, posting snippets
of code without posting a URL is in effect a way of saying "hi, I just want
to spend some time of mine and yours without letting you actually help me".

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

[Prasad]

Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

Scripsit Prasad:

please help me out ..

Please start behaving: don't multipost. Multiposting is bad. I'm so sorry I
wasted bandwidth by answering one of your questions in c.i.w.a.html, since
multiposters seldom learn from useful answers, but maybe someone else will
benefit from the reply.

I did nt understand what you are saying
???????????????????????????????????

Oh, and in any complicated matter related to www authoring, posting snippets
of code without posting a URL is in effect a way of saying "hi, I just want
to spend some time of mine and yours without letting you actually help me".

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

[Nik]

Prasad wrote:

>>
Please start behaving: don't multipost. Multiposting is bad. I'm so sorry I
wasted bandwidth by answering one of your questions in c.i.w.a.html, since
multiposters seldom learn from useful answers, but maybe someone else will
benefit from the reply.

>>Oh, and in any complicated matter related to www authoring, posting snippets
of code without posting a URL is in effect a way of saying "hi, I just want
to spend some time of mine and yours without letting you actually help me".

I did nt understand what you are saying
???????????????????????????????????

You posted the same content to different newsgroups in different
messages. This means that people reading one of those newsgroups won't
see replies made in the other(s). It's known as multi-posting, and it's
rude. If you really don't know which newsgroup your message is most
relevant to, you can tell Google groups' software to post the same
messages to two groups.

Many people find it easiest to understand the context of your question
if you post a link to the page you're having a problem with, rather than
posting the code. It's difficult to view raw code and determine the
problem.

Nik

[Dr J R Stockton]

In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets message
<ej**********@gemini.csx.cam.ac.uk>, Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:55:23, Nik
<ne**@invalid.comwrote:

If you really don't know which newsgroup your message is most
relevant to, you can tell Google groups' software to post the same
messages to two groups.

What you actually mean is "the same message to two groups". The
distinction is important : in cross-posting, there is but a single
message transmitted.

--
(c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ??*@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/- FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.
Check boilerplate spelling -- error is a public sign of incompetence.
Never fully trust an article from a poster who gives no full real name.

[Nik]

Dr J R Stockton wrote:

>

> If you really don't know which newsgroup your message is most
relevant to, you can tell Google groups' software to post the same
messages to two groups.

What you actually mean is "the same message to two groups". The
distinction is important : in cross-posting, there is but a single
message transmitted.

That is, of course, exactly what I meant.

Now, if only there were some way to tell Thunderbird that there was only
one message...

Nik

[Prasad]

Nik wrote:

Prasad wrote:

>
Please start behaving: don't multipost. Multiposting is bad. I'm so sorry I
wasted bandwidth by answering one of your questions in c.i.w.a.html, since
multiposters seldom learn from useful answers, but maybe someone else will
benefit from the reply.

>Oh, and in any complicated matter related to www authoring, posting snippets
of code without posting a URL is in effect a way of saying "hi, I just want
to spend some time of mine and yours without letting you actually help me".

>
I did nt understand what you are saying
???????????????????????????????????

You posted the same content to different newsgroups in different
messages. This means that people reading one of those newsgroups won't
see replies made in the other(s). It's known as multi-posting, and it's
rude. If you really don't know which newsgroup your message is most
relevant to, you can tell Google groups' software to post the same
messages to two groups.

Many people find it easiest to understand the context of your question
if you post a link to the page you're having a problem with, rather than
posting the code. It's difficult to view raw code and determine the
problem.

I am sorry to say that I can n't post a link to the page which has the
problem as it's not available now . And also I cann't post the whole
code as it's not much readable .
So I tried to minimise the code as much as possible, which creates the
same problem
If you could just copy the above code ,paste in an editor , save the
file as html , and open the file in mozilla browser , you will get to
know what the problem is ..

Thanks if any can solve my problem ..

>
Nik