Transparent Background-Colour

[Thomas Wieser]

Hi,

my problem: I have some tables with transparent backgrounds, which are
changed in colours within a JavaScript DOM function to have a roll-over
effect.

Now, i can't get them back transparent when leaving the mouse out of the
rollover-box - background-color: none; seems not to work.

Isn't it possible to do this with CSS?
Greetings, Thomas

[Andrew Thompson]

"Thomas Wieser" <we***********@ gmx.net> wrote in message
news:bh******** ****@ID-202437.news.uni-berlin.de...
.....

my problem: I have some tables with transparent backgrounds, which are
changed in colours within a JavaScript DOM function to have a roll-over
effect.

Now, i can't get them back transparent when leaving the mouse out of the
rollover-box - background-color: none; seems not to work.

Have you considered using background-image instead?

You could use a 1x1 pixel colored gif or png
for your colors, and a similar transparent one
for 'see-through'.

[ I don't know if there is a way of doing it with
background-color ]

HTH

--
Andrew Thompson
http://www.lensescapes.com/
http://www.physci.org/
http://www.1point1c.org/

[Fox]

Thomas Wieser wrote:

Hi,

my problem: I have some tables with transparent backgrounds, which are
changed in colours within a JavaScript DOM function to have a roll-over
effect.

Now, i can't get them back transparent when leaving the mouse out of the
rollover-box - background-color: none; seems not to work.

Isn't it possible to do this with CSS?
If you do this with javascript (onmouseover/onmouseout attributes in
table tags), just set the backgroundColor to an empty string:

<table onmouseover = "this.style.bac kgroundColor='r ed'"
onmouseout = "this.style.bac kgroundColor = ''">
Greetings, Thomas

[Chris Morris]

Thomas Wieser <we***********@ gmx.net> writes:

my problem: I have some tables with transparent backgrounds, which are
changed in colours within a JavaScript DOM function to have a
roll-over effect.

Now, i can't get them back transparent when leaving the mouse out of
the rollover-box - background-color: none; seems not to work.
Try background-color: transparent; - there isn't a background-color: none;
Isn't it possible to do this with CSS?

table { background-color: transparent; }
table:hover { background-color: red; }

Browser support will vary - certainly older browsers only tended to
support :hover on <a>.

--
Chris

[Johannes Koch]

Thomas Wieser wrote:

Hi,

my problem: I have some tables with transparent backgrounds, which are
changed in colours within a JavaScript DOM function to have a roll-over
effect.

Now, i can't get them back transparent when leaving the mouse out of the
rollover-box - background-color: none; seems not to work.

'none' is not a valid value for background-color. Why not try
'transparent' if you want the background to be transparent?
--
Johannes Koch
In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum.
(Te Deum, 4th cent.)

[Tim]

"Thomas Wieser" <we***********@ gmx.net> wrote

my problem: I have some tables with transparent backgrounds, which are
changed in colours within a JavaScript DOM function to have a roll-over
effect.

Now, i can't get them back transparent when leaving the mouse out of the
rollover-box - background-color: none; seems not to work.

On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 06:51:28 GMT,
"Andrew Thompson" <an******@bigNO SPAMpond.com> wrote:
Have you considered using background-image instead?

You could use a 1x1 pixel colored gif or png
for your colors, and a similar transparent one
for 'see-through'.

[ I don't know if there is a way of doing it with
background-color ]

Is it any wonder that we have so many bad websites, when instead of
checking if something can be done (like reading the publicly available
CSS specifications) , a convoluted and daft solution is done, instead?

CSS was designed to get away from doing daft tricks with images, to
achieve the desired results, directly. But we still have people using
CSS to do the same stupid trick in yet another way.

There's things like "background-image: none" which could ensure that no
preset background image is used, anymore. And "background-color:
transparent" to get transparent (sic) colours.

Anybody authoring for the web should really read the HTML and CSS
specifications. Even if they only read the preambles, and the technical
bits directly related to what they're trying to do, rather than the
whole lot. Anybody who says that they can't understand the specs,
probably doesn't have the nouse to understand what they're doing when
they're authoring, either.

Why play with technical things, if you don't have a technical bent.
Please don't get interested in first aid, we don't need people
practising things without proper knowledge.

--

I'm sick of seeing too many stupid things over the last few days...

--
My "from" address is totally fake. The reply-to address is real, but
may be only temporary. Reply to usenet postings in the same place as
you read the message you're replying to.

[Andrew Thompson]

"Tim" <ad***@sheerhel l.lan> wrote in message
news:hl******** *************** *********@4ax.c om...
....

Anybody authoring for the web should really read the HTML and CSS
specifications.

And anybody getting snotty about the quality of _my_
answers could at least provide a link to the resource
they were mentioning.

http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/ (unless you have a better one)

--
Andrew Thompson
http://www.lensescapes.com/
http://www.physci.org/
http://www.1point1c.org/

[Tim]

"Tim" <ad***@sheerhel l.lan> wrote

Anybody authoring for the web should really read the HTML and CSS
specifications.

On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 23:21:36 GMT,
"Andrew Thompson" <an******@bigNO SPAMpond.com> wrote:
And anybody getting snotty about the quality of _my_
answers could at least provide a link to the resource
they were mentioning.

http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/ (unless you have a better one)

See, you found it; and you get to read them for free, too. I can't
believe that those links aren't posted in this news group so repeatedly
that you'd never have encountered, and bookmarked, them before.

Any newcomer not bothering to look for what's a FAQ, doesn't gain a
great deal of sympathy, either.

--
My "from" address is totally fake. The reply-to address is real, but
may be only temporary. Reply to usenet postings in the same place as
you read the message you're replying to.