prefix decrement on temporary object

[subramanian100in]

Consider the code fragment:

vector<intcontainer;

container.insert(container.begin(), 10);

int& ref = *--container.end();

From this, it looks like we can apply prefix decrement operator to
container.end() - ie 'prefix --' can be applied to the iterator type
object which happens to be a temporary here.

In general can we apply prefix/postfix increment/decrement operator on
a temporary object of some class type ?

Kindly clarify.

Thanks
V.Subramanian

[Salt_Peter]

On Jan 7, 8:26 am, "[e-mail], India"
<[e-mail]:

Consider the code fragment:

vector<intcontainer;

container.insert(container.begin(), 10);

int& ref = *--container.end();

From this, it looks like we can apply prefix decrement operator to
container.end() - ie 'prefix --' can be applied to the iterator type
object which happens to be a temporary here.

In general can we apply prefix/postfix increment/decrement operator on
a temporary object of some class type ?

Kindly clarify.

Thanks
V.Subramanian

You can increment/decrement a temporary all you like, what is being
stored here is the resulting reference to an element. Some
implementations of std::vector use pointers as iterators, with
pointers - prefix decrement/increment may fail under certain
conditions (ie: passing the resulting temporary to a function). If
your vector implementation uses a iterator type instead of a pointer,
you'll be fine. Nonetheless, --container.end() is considered to be non-
portable.

Which then begs the question - why not use:

int& ref = container.back();

and since you appear to be pushing elements at front of vector, why
aren't you choosing a std::deque< int instead?

#include <iostream>
#include <deque>

int main()
{
std::deque<intcontainer;
container.push_front(10);
container.push_front(9);
container.push_back(11);
int& ref = container.back();
std::cout << ref << std::endl;
}

Note: a deque does not store its elements in contiguous storage like
an array or vector. It has random iterators and op[] as well as at().

[James Kanze]

On Jan 7, 2:26 pm, "[e-mail], India"
<[e-mail]:

Consider the code fragment:

vector<intcontainer;

container.insert(container.begin(), 10);

int& ref = *--container.end();

From this, it looks like we can apply prefix decrement
operator to container.end() - ie 'prefix --' can be applied to
the iterator type object which happens to be a temporary here.

It's unspecified.

In general can we apply prefix/postfix increment/decrement
operator on a temporary object of some class type ?

The built-in operator -- requires an lvalue, and will not work
on a temporary object. A user defined operator -- may or may
not require an lvalue, depending on whether it is a member
function or a free function. The standard does not specify
whether the -- above is a user defined operator or the built-in
operator, and for user defined operators, it leaves the
implementation free to choose whether it uses a member function
or a free function to overload the operator.

So your expression might work, or it might not.

--
James Kanze (GABI Software) mailto:ja*********@gmail.com
Conseils en informatique orient�e objet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9 place S�mard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l'�cole, France, [phone]

[James Kanze]

On Jan 7, 3:07 pm, Salt_Peter <[e-mail]:

On Jan 7, 8:26 am, "[e-mail], India"
<[e-mail]:

Consider the code fragment:

vector<intcontainer;

container.insert(container.begin(), 10);

int& ref = *--container.end();

From this, it looks like we can apply prefix decrement
operator to container.end() - ie 'prefix --' can be applied
to the iterator type object which happens to be a temporary
here.

In general can we apply prefix/postfix increment/decrement
operator on a temporary object of some class type ?

You can increment/decrement a temporary all you like,

No. You cannot increment or decrement a temporary. You can
call a member function on a temporary, however---even a
non-const member function. In his case, operator-- is probably
a member function, which is why the code compiles.

what is being stored here is the resulting reference to an
element. Some implementations of std::vector use pointers as
iterators, with pointers - prefix decrement/increment may fail
under certain conditions (ie: passing the resulting temporary
to a function).

Trying to increment a temporary pointer will always fail,
regardless of the conditions.

If your vector implementation uses a iterator type instead of
a pointer, you'll be fine.

That's not guaranteed either. For a class type, operator-- can
be either a member or a non-member function. If it's a
non-member, the parameter is almost certainly a non-const
reference, and you can't bind a temporary to a non-const
reference.

Nonetheless, --container.end() is considered to be non-
portable.

Because it's not guaranteed to work.

--
James Kanze (GABI Software) email:ja*********@gmail.com
Conseils en informatique orientée objet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9 place Sémard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l'École, France, [phone]