sharing variables across mulitple files

[awhan.iitk]

I have a set of variables that I want to share across mulitple c++
files. I was using the extern method so far. Is there any other way to
do the same. The variables are not constants and I get the values
during run time.

[Jim Langston]

aw********@gmai l.com wrote:

I have a set of variables that I want to share across mulitple c++
files. I was using the extern method so far. Is there any other way to
do the same. The variables are not constants and I get the values
during run time.

extern is the way you do it normally, other than passing the variables as
parameters.

--
Jim Langston
ta*******@rocke tmail.com

[awhan.iitk]

On May 6, 3:07 pm, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rock etmail.comwrote :

>
extern is the way you do it normally, other than passing the variables as
parameters.

--
Jim Langston
tazmas...@rocke tmail.com

thanks for the reply. yes i should have also mentioned that i did not
want to pass the variables all the time. the reason i am looking for
alternate ways is after learning that memory for global variables is
reserved in the heap and a lot of global variables can create problems
for a program.

[Pete Becker]

On 2008-05-06 06:26:32 -0400, "aw********@gma il.com"
<aw********@gma il.comsaid:

On May 6, 3:07 pm, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rock etmail.comwrote :

>>
extern is the way you do it normally, other than passing the variables as
parameters.

--
Jim Langston
tazmas...@rock etmail.com

thanks for the reply. yes i should have also mentioned that i did not
want to pass the variables all the time. the reason i am looking for
alternate ways is after learning that memory for global variables is
reserved in the heap

Not usually. They go in the same memory area as static data.

and a lot of global variables can create problems
for a program.

Well, as far as memory usage, maybe. But more important is that they
introduce sneak paths for data modification, which can make program
analysis and maintenance harder. Sometimes sharing is unavoidable, of
course.

--
Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

[Jim Langston]

Pete Becker wrote:

On 2008-05-06 06:26:32 -0400, "aw********@gma il.com"
<aw********@gma il.comsaid:

>On May 6, 3:07 pm, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rock etmail.comwrote :

>>>
extern is the way you do it normally, other than passing the
variables as parameters.

--
Jim Langston
tazmas...@roc ketmail.com

thanks for the reply. yes i should have also mentioned that i did not
want to pass the variables all the time. the reason i am looking for
alternate ways is after learning that memory for global variables is
reserved in the heap

Not usually. They go in the same memory area as static data.

> and a lot of global variables can create problems
for a program.

Well, as far as memory usage, maybe. But more important is that they
introduce sneak paths for data modification, which can make program
analysis and maintenance harder. Sometimes sharing is unavoidable, of
course.

I have one project where I am forces to use global variables because of the
engine I am using having multiple callbbacks and it's impossible for me to
pass the data. One thing I did was I put all the global variables in a
structure and have just one instance of the structure. I'm not sure if it
simplifies anything, but it helps.

--
Jim Langston
ta*******@rocke tmail.com

[Cynic]

On May 6, 5:50 pm, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rock etmail.comwrote :

Pete Becker wrote:

On 2008-05-06 06:26:32 -0400, "awhan.i...@gma il.com"
<awhan.i...@gma il.comsaid:

On May 6, 3:07 pm, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rock etmail.comwrote :

>extern is the way you do it normally, other than passing the
variables as parameters.

>--
Jim Langston
tazmas...@rock etmail.com

thanks for the reply. yes i should have also mentioned that i did not
want to pass the variables all the time. the reason i am looking for
alternate ways is after learning that memory for global variables is
reserved in the heap

Not usually. They go in the same memory area as static data.

and a lot of global variables can create problems
for a program.

Well, as far as memory usage, maybe. But more important is that they
introduce sneak paths for data modification, which can make program
analysis and maintenance harder. Sometimes sharing is unavoidable, of
course.

I have one project where I am forces to use global variables because of the
engine I am using having multiple callbbacks and it's impossible for me to
pass the data. One thing I did was I put all the global variables in a
structure and have just one instance of the structure. I'm not sure if it
simplifies anything, but it helps.

--
Jim Langston
tazmas...@rocke tmail.com

the structure idea is actually novel. how about if u just include the
prog that has the variables defined in them, and call a function from
the new one to the old one?
will that work?

[dizzy]

Jim Langston wrote:

I have one project where I am forces to use global variables because of
the engine I am using having multiple callbbacks and it's impossible for
me to
pass the data. One thing I did was I put all the global variables in a
structure and have just one instance of the structure. I'm not sure if it
simplifies anything, but it helps.

Sounds like a very bad C callback mechanism. It is a "C" callback mechanism
because otherwise it would have allowed generic functors and full compile
time type checking on the given functions and arguments. It is a "bad C
callback mechanism" because otherwise it would take in one form or another
an opaque argument (usually under the form of a "void*" argument) to
register along with the callback and that value is passed back to the
callback, the argument usually being used to transmit state from the code
registering the callback to the callback.

Yeah, organizing the data to be shared in a struct may help (it is usually
required with the "void*" passing method described above).

--
Dizzy