C++0x on name mangling.

[jason.cipriani]

Does anybody know if C++0x is going to change C++ name mangling at
all? Such as, standardizing name mangling instead of leaving it up to
the compiler?

Jason

[James Kanze]

On Feb 29, 3:44 am, "jason.cipri... @gmail.com"
<jason.cipri... @gmail.comwrote :

Does anybody know if C++0x is going to change C++ name
mangling at all? Such as, standardizing name mangling instead
of leaving it up to the compiler?

C++ does not, and in fact, cannot define implementation details.
There are too many differences at the architecture level to make
this practical.

Specific platforms can, and occasionally do, define a platform
specific C++ API. Regretfully, far too occasionally---there
isn't one for either Solaris/Sparc nor Windows/PC, and as far as
I know, only an ad hoc one for Linux/PC. (All platforms I know
do defined a platform specific API for C.)

And of course, any time the API differs, you want some sort of
differing conventions for name mangling, so that you don't
accidentally link code which won't work together. (I'm not
aware of any case where the API's are identical, but the name
mangling isn't. I would consider the name mangling part of the
API. On the other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if different
languages---e.g. Pascal and C---under Windows mangled the names
in the same way, despite using different calling conventions.
It was, at least, a problem under MS-DOS.)

--
James Kanze (GABI Software) email:ja******* **@gmail.com
Conseils en informatique orientée objet/
Beratung in objektorientier ter Datenverarbeitu ng
9 place Sémard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l'École, France, [phone]

[PeterAPIIT]

What is name mangling ? No idea what u talking here ?

Thanks for your explanation

[Lionel B]

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:31:29 -0800, PeterAPIIT wrote:

What is name mangling ? No idea what u talking here ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_mangling

--
Lionel B

[jason.cipriani]

On Feb 29, 4:31 am, James Kanze <james.ka...@gm ail.comwrote:

[all kinds of stuff]

Thanks for the good explanation!

>On the other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if different
languages---e.g. Pascal and C---under Windows mangled the names
in the same way, despite using different calling conventions.

FYI, that problem no longer seems to exist:

void __stdcall sfunction (int) { }
void __fastcall ffunction (int) { }
void __cdecl cfunction (int) { }

Ends up with:

00000012 T ?cfunction@@YAX H@Z
00000007 T ?ffunction@@YIX H@Z
00000000 T ?sfunction@@YGX H@Z

Using both MS CL 12.00 (VS 6) and 14.00 (VS 2005).

Thanks,
Jason