I've run across some rather peculiar code; here are the relevant lines
that left me confused :
unsigned char cr_file[384];
unsigned char num_char[0];
Note: this declaration actually works on our compiler, and it appears
to be equivalent to giving a length of 1. The developer inserted
compiler options into the make file to turn off the relevant warning
messages. Sadly, this is not the most confusing part of the code. This
is an example of the confusing part:
num_char[0] = 1;
memcpy(&cr_file[147], num_char, 1);
num_char is used only in this fashion; its value after the call to
memcpy() has no bearing on the behavior of the program. I may be
missing something, but it seems to me that this code is therefore
exactly equivalent to
cr_file[147] = 1;
In fact, I would expect that some compilers would generate identical
code for both ways of writing it.
Am I missing something? If not, could someone at least suggest a
plausible reason why the developer might write such bizarre code? I
can't ask the developer, he died recently, which is how I became
responsible for this code. 11 2029
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:27:34 -0700, kuyper wrote:
I've run across some rather peculiar code; here are the relevant lines
that left me confused :
unsigned char cr_file[384];
unsigned char num_char[0];
IIRC, this is a GCC extension. I had problems with this when using the
Microsoft Visual C compiler (which still uses some fork of the ISO89
standard). After further investigation it turned out this seemed to be an
extension and should throw a warning/error when compiling the --pedantic.
Jensen.
kuyper wrote:
I've run across some rather peculiar code; here are the relevant lines
that left me confused :
unsigned char cr_file[384];
unsigned char num_char[0];
Note: this declaration actually works on our compiler, and it appears
to be equivalent to giving a length of 1. The developer inserted
compiler options into the make file to turn off the relevant warning
messages. Sadly, this is not the most confusing part of the code. This
is an example of the confusing part:
num_char[0] = 1;
memcpy(&cr_file[147], num_char, 1);
num_char is used only in this fashion; its value after the call to
memcpy() has no bearing on the behavior of the program. I may be
missing something, but it seems to me that this code is therefore
exactly equivalent to
cr_file[147] = 1;
In fact, I would expect that some compilers would generate identical
code for both ways of writing it.
I'd be inclined to investigate what my compiler generated for each of
these constructs and look at what the differences might imply...
As you have given us very little context - platform, compiler, etc -
unless someone here has seen exactly this, it's unlikely we can comment
much more.
Mark Bluemel wrote:
....
As you have given us very little context - platform, compiler, etc -
unless someone here has seen exactly this, it's unlikely we can comment
much more.
Platform: SGI Origin 300 running IRIX 6.5. The compiler is the SGI C
compiler distributed with that version of IRIX. Compiler options: -O2 -
mips4 -xansi -fullwarn. I first noticed this code when I changed -
xansi to -ansi, which apparantly turns off an SGI extension supporting
0-length arrays.
On Aug 24, 3:27 am, kuyper <kuy...@wizard. netwrote:
I've run across some rather peculiar code; here are the relevant lines
that left me confused :
unsigned char cr_file[384];
unsigned char num_char[0];
Do these lines occur inside a structure definition?
Old Wolf wrote:
On Aug 24, 3:27 am, kuyper <kuy...@wizard. netwrote:
I've run across some rather peculiar code; here are the relevant lines
that left me confused :
unsigned char cr_file[384];
unsigned char num_char[0];
Do these lines occur inside a structure definition?
No - they occur at block scope.
On 2007-08-24 12:01, kuyper <ku****@wizard. netwrote:
Old Wolf wrote:
>On Aug 24, 3:27 am, kuyper <kuy...@wizard. netwrote:
I've run across some rather peculiar code; here are the relevant lines
that left me confused :
unsigned char cr_file[384];
unsigned char num_char[0];
Do these lines occur inside a structure definition?
No - they occur at block scope.
That's strange. Before C89 many compilers accepted zero-sized arrays and
it was a common idiom to define a structure like this:
struct foo {
size_t size; /* more likely int a the time */
short whatever;
double data[0];
}
and use it like this:
struct foo *p = malloc(sizeof struct foo + sizeof double * nelems);
p->size = nelems;
p->whatever = 42;
for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++) {
p->data[i] = get_some_data() ;
}
/* do some more processing */
free(p);
data didn't actually use any space in the struct, but enforced proper
alignment and padding, so the single malloc would allocate the exact
amount of memory needed.
C89 didn't standardize zero-sized arrays (presumably because they
didn't fit with the "pointer arithmetic only defined within an object"
model) and subsequently people stopped using that idiom and (more)
compilers started to reject it.
I don't know what possible use a zero-sized array could have as an
automatic variable. If it's really zero-sized it's completely useless,
and if it isn't it must be some fixed size (at least if it is used with
memset as you showed - if it was used with ordinary indexes I could
imagine some compiler magic implementing a dynamic array[0]), and if it's
some fixed size, why not use that?
hp
[0] Yes, there could of course be some other compiler magic which calls
__builtin_dynam ic_array_memset if memset is used on zero-sized
array and __builtin_norma l_memset otherwise.
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | I know I'd be respectful of a pirate
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | with an emu on his shoulder.
| | | hj*@hjp.at |
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Sam in "Freefall"
Jensen Somers wrote:
kuyper wrote:
>I've run across some rather peculiar code; here are the relevant lines that left me confused :
unsigned char cr_file[384];
Yhis defines an array of 384 unsigned chars, indices 0 through 383.
> unsigned char num_char[0];
This is illegal. 0 size arrays cannot be declared.
I am piggybacking this reply.
--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home .att.net>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
CBFalconer wrote:
Jensen Somers wrote:
kuyper wrote:
I've run across some rather peculiar code; here are the relevant
lines that left me confused :
unsigned char cr_file[384];
Yhis defines an array of 384 unsigned chars, indices 0 through 383.
Yes, of course. The size of that array doesn't confuse me. The bizarre
thing is the way it was used.
unsigned char num_char[0];
This is illegal. 0 size arrays cannot be declared.
Well, of course. Nonetheless, it was declared, and it does compile,
and it does work, apparently as a result of using a compiler flag
which enables SGI-specific extensions. A (small) part of my question
is "why was it declared with a length of 0?" The bigger part is given
in the Subject: header.
kuyper <ku****@wizard. netwrites:
CBFalconer wrote:
[...]
>This is illegal. 0 size arrays cannot be declared.
Well, of course. Nonetheless, it was declared, and it does compile,
and it does work, apparently as a result of using a compiler flag
which enables SGI-specific extensions. A (small) part of my question
is "why was it declared with a length of 0?" The bigger part is given
in the Subject: header.
You said elsethread that this appears to be an SGI-specific extension.
Have you tried one of the comp.sys.sgi.* newsgroups? Or can you
contact SGI customer support?
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keit h) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <* <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister" This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: franky.backeljauw |
last post by:
Hello,
following my question on "std::copy versus pointer copy versus member
copy", I had some doubts on the function memcpy, as was used by tom_usenet
in his reply.
- Is this a c++ standard library function? That is, can I be sure that
every c++ standard library has this function? Or is there a c++
alternative to it?
|
by: Samee Zahur |
last post by:
Hi all,
I'm a little confused - my guess is memcpy is no longer (or perhaps
never was) a standard c++ function, since it has very little type check
into it - and can potentially create havoc for user-defined types. Now
my confusion is here - a simple instantiation of the standard copy
algorithm can be quite slow compared to the older memcpy for obvious
reasons - specially for a large array of built-in types like int or
something; so do...
|
by: gsyoon |
last post by:
hi, all.
I'm trying to make a "framework" to store the return value of a
function to a global memory.
My first attempt was
1)
void store_to_global( char * type_name ) {
if ( strcmp( type_name, "CLASS_A") )
|
by: Richard Hayden |
last post by:
Hi,
I've just upgraded my gcc and I'm currently trying to compile some code for
my own operating system kernel, but I am getting an error of "Undefined
reference to `memcpy`" when I try to link it using the GNU linker. I do not
reference the symbol memcpy explicitly anywhere in the offending function.
I have narrowed the offending code down to the initialisation of an array
of pointers to char (i.e. an array of strings), which is given...
|
by: Sourcerer |
last post by:
Hi all.
Can I do this to duplicate the contents of struct a in struct b
struct myStruct a, b, *aptr, *bptr;
aptr = a;
bptr = b;
Do something to initialize contents of structure a
memcpy(bptr, aptr, sizeof(myStruct));
| |
by: Case |
last post by:
#define SIZE 100
#define USE_MEMCPY
int main(void)
{
char a;
char b;
int n;
/* code 'filling' a */
|
by: myhotline |
last post by:
hi all
im very confused about using memcpy and i have three
questions....memcpy takes a pointer to src and a pointer to dest and
copies src to destination...but im very confuzed about when to use '&'
operator while using memcpy....i have code that use '&' and the code
that call memcpy without '&'
like is the following same
Quest1
---
|
by: novice |
last post by:
Please explain with an example whts the
DIFFERENCE between "memcpy" and "memmove"
|
by: Eric |
last post by:
Tell me why the following doesn't work...
void MyClass::StoreCommand( struct command cmdToStore )
{
memcpy( (char*)&theCommand,
(char*)&cmdToStore,
sizeof( struct command ) );
}
theCommand is also a struct command type.
|
by: subramanian100in |
last post by:
Suppose I need to assign one structure to another.
Should each member of the structure be assigned individually or can
memcpy be used ?
Since the compiler can add padding bytes, which approach is always
safer ?
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
| |
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
| |
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
|
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |