diff multi-line whitespace to verify Beautifier output

[Shug]

Hi,

We're reformatting a lot of our project code using the excellent
uncrustify beautifier.

However, to gain confidence that it really is only changing whitespace
(forget { } issues for just now), we were hoping to do a diff - a
textual comparison of the files, ignoring whitespace.

However, most diffs we've tried can't handle multi-line whitespace, so
the following two
prototypes are deemed to be different:

void doStuff( int a, float b);

void doStuff(int a,
float b);

Has anyone found a way to do a diff like this, that handles multi-line
whitespace?

Shug

[Victor Bazarov]

Shug wrote:

We're reformatting a lot of our project code using the excellent
uncrustify beautifier.

However, to gain confidence that it really is only changing whitespace
(forget { } issues for just now), we were hoping to do a diff - a
textual comparison of the files, ignoring whitespace.

However, most diffs we've tried can't handle multi-line whitespace, so
the following two
prototypes are deemed to be different:

void doStuff( int a, float b);

void doStuff(int a,
float b);

Has anyone found a way to do a diff like this, that handles multi-line
whitespace?

I would actually do it differently: tokenize both sources. If the set
of tokens is the same, you have the same source (now, don't ask me where
you can find C++ tokenizers, I don't know, GIYF). The other way is to
convert both of those into the third type of formatting (which should
give you the exactly same output) and compare them. If the formatter
make mistakes, it's likely to make them independently.

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask

[=?iso-8859-1?q?Erik_Wikstr=F6m?=]

On Feb 12, 3:24 pm, "Victor Bazarov" <v.Abaza...@com Acast.netwrote:

Shug wrote:

We're reformatting a lot of our project code using the excellent
uncrustify beautifier.

However, to gain confidence that it really is only changing whitespace
(forget { } issues for just now), we were hoping to do a diff - a
textual comparison of the files, ignoring whitespace.

However, most diffs we've tried can't handle multi-line whitespace, so
the following two
prototypes are deemed to be different:

void doStuff( int a, float b);

void doStuff(int a,
float b);

Has anyone found a way to do a diff like this, that handles multi-line
whitespace?

I would actually do it differently: tokenize both sources. If the set
of tokens is the same, you have the same source (now, don't ask me where
you can find C++ tokenizers, I don't know, GIYF). The other way is to
convert both of those into the third type of formatting (which should
give you the exactly same output) and compare them. If the formatter
make mistakes, it's likely to make them independently.

A simple third format would be one where every whitespace is replaced
by a newline, which will give a format that is easy to compare (and I
think it will still be valid C++ :-)

--
Erik Wikström

[Victor Bazarov]

Erik Wikström wrote:

On Feb 12, 3:24 pm, "Victor Bazarov" <v.Abaza...@com Acast.netwrote:

>Shug wrote:

>>We're reformatting a lot of our project code using the excellent
uncrustify beautifier.

>>However, to gain confidence that it really is only changing
whitespace (forget { } issues for just now), we were hoping to do a
diff - a textual comparison of the files, ignoring whitespace.

>>However, most diffs we've tried can't handle multi-line whitespace,
so the following two
prototypes are deemed to be different:

>>void doStuff( int a, float b);

>>void doStuff(int a,
float b);

>>Has anyone found a way to do a diff like this, that handles
multi-line whitespace?

I would actually do it differently: tokenize both sources. If the
set of tokens is the same, you have the same source (now, don't ask
me where you can find C++ tokenizers, I don't know, GIYF). The
other way is to convert both of those into the third type of
formatting (which should give you the exactly same output) and
compare them. If the formatter make mistakes, it's likely to make
them independently.

A simple third format would be one where every whitespace is replaced
by a newline, which will give a format that is easy to compare (and I
think it will still be valid C++ :-)

It wouldn't be valid C++ without some continuation characters (\) in
macro definitions. And broken up include directives aren't going to
work either. :-)

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask

[Shug]

On 12 Feb, 13:15, "Shug" <enoesqu...@yah oo.co.ukwrote:

Hi,

We're reformatting a lot of our project code using the excellent
uncrustifybeaut ifier.

However, to gain confidence that it really is only changing whitespace
(forget { } issues for just now), we were hoping to do a diff - a
textual comparison of the files, ignoring whitespace.

However, most diffs we've tried can't handle multi-line whitespace, so
the following two
prototypes are deemed to be different:

void doStuff( int a, float b);

void doStuff(int a,
float b);

Has anyone found a way to do a diff like this, that handles multi-line
whitespace?

Shug

Thanks for your contributions guys.

In the end, we've managed to find another satisfactory solution.

After reformatting the source code, we run both the before and after
source files through tr:

tr -d '\r\n' < file1.cpp temp1.txt
tr -d '\r\n' < file2.cpp temp2.txt

then do a diff on the tr'd files

C:\cygwin\bin\d iff -bBw temp1.txt temp2.txt

This is all using a cygwin installation on Windows XP.

This does exactly what we need.

Thanks again.

Shug