Global var in Balance calculation

[Maria Mela]

Hello everyone...
Anybody can help me on this question, please?
i´ve this code in my application:

/*for Card creation*/
typedef struct card
{
etc,etc
} Card;
typedef Card *PtrCrt;

/*For trans creation*/
typedef struct trans
{
etc,etc
} Trans;
typedef Trans *PtrTrans;

I need to calculate the Balance of every card and how put this verification
in one function?!

[Keith Thompson]

Jeff Mullen <41*@nls.netwri tes:

Flash Gordon wrote:

Jeff Mullen wrote, On 22/01/07 07:47:
<snip>

P.S.

http://www.nls.net/mp/413/sea.ZIP

Self-expanding arrays. (This is the code your college professor
warned you about.) :) :) :)

Extracts from the code in the archive above...
from sea.h:

[snip]

>
Thank you for looking my code over. I hope that all the people
whom you provide with unsolicited reviews will be as forthright,
and in as much a position to make changes regarding your constructive
criticism, as I am.

As a matter of internet etiquette, you should have sent me a private
email about this--not because the message might air some "dirty
laundry" of mine (I don't care about that if it improves the code),
but because, as I am rather busy, the message on a usenet list might
expire before I can get back to it. Thankfully, that was not the
case this time. You should also consider asking people whether
they would like their code reviewed when they do not explicitly
request this service. As I pointed out, I appreciate your efforts,
but you should be more sensitive to the possibility of other points
of view.

If you don't want your code publicly reviewed, I suggest not making it
publicly available. If you don't want it reviewed in this newsgroup,
don't post a link to it in this newgroup. The review was as much for
the benefit of other readers who saw the link as it was for you.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keit h) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <* <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.

[Richard Heathfield]

Jeff Mullen said:

<snip>

Thank you for looking my code over. I hope that all the people
whom you provide with unsolicited reviews will be as forthright,
and in as much a position to make changes regarding your constructive
criticism, as I am.

As a matter of internet etiquette, you should have sent me a private
email about this

Wrong. Post here, read here.

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.

[Mark McIntyre]

On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:43:37 -0500, in comp.lang.c , Jeff Mullen
<41*@nls.netwro te:

>As a matter of internet etiquette, you should have sent me a private
email about this--

This is usenet: write here, read here.

>because, as I am rather busy, the message on a usenet list might
expire before I can get back to it.

So you mean that because /you're/ busy, the dozens of people reading
your posting have to send you individual messages. Don't you think
thats a bit absurd?

>case this time. You should also consider asking people whether
they would like their code reviewed when they do not explicitly
request this service.

One of the things that happens to code here in CLC is that it gets
reviewed. If you don't want your code reviewed, the fix is - don't
post it or link to it.

Of course, if you don't post it, then its awfully hard for people to
help you with any problems with it. You're likely to get lots of
replys along hte lines of "my crystal ball is broken, but I think its
line 42".
--
Mark McIntyre

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan

[Flash Gordon]

Keith Thompson wrote, On 02/02/07 02:13:

Jeff Mullen <41*@nls.netwri tes:

>Flash Gordon wrote:

>>Jeff Mullen wrote, On 22/01/07 07:47:

<snip>

>>Extracts from the code in the archive above...
from sea.h:

[snip]

>Thank you for looking my code over. I hope that all the people
whom you provide with unsolicited reviews will be as forthright,

<snip>

If you don't want your code publicly reviewed, I suggest not making it
publicly available. If you don't want it reviewed in this newsgroup,
don't post a link to it in this newgroup. The review was as much for
the benefit of other readers who saw the link as it was for you.

For the record, I consider any posting of code here (or links to such
code) to be, amongst other things, a request for it to be reviewed so no
review can be considered unsolicited. This includes any code I post, of
course, and whilst I don't like having my errors pointed out I like even
less having the errors left uncorrected.

I agree with the rest of what Ben, Keith and Richard posted as well.
--
Flash Gordon