I have a class with a private array data member 'm_array'. I have
written a public function, called 'fileRead', to read values into the
array from a file. I just noticed that I have declared this function to
be const.
I dont understand how the code compiled and executed without returning
an error or a warning. I am assigning values from a file to m_array
inside this function. I thought that a member function can be made
const only if *this (this pointer) is not being modified. Am I missing
something?
Btw, I am using the Visual C++ .NET environment to run the code. 7 1891
Bala L wrote:
I have a class with a private array data member 'm_array'. I have
written a public function, called 'fileRead', to read values into the
array from a file. I just noticed that I have declared this function
to be const.
I dont understand how the code compiled and executed without returning
an error or a warning. I am assigning values from a file to m_array
inside this function. I thought that a member function can be made
const only if *this (this pointer) is not being modified. Am I missing
something?
I don't know. What *we* are missing is the actual code. For all we
know the alleged "array" could be a pointer to a dynamic array. Then
when you're modifying the elements (by assigning to them), you aren't
changing the instance, only the memory to which the pointer points.
Read the FAQ 5.8.
Btw, I am using the Visual C++ .NET environment to run the code.
That shouldn't matter.
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
Victor Bazarov wrote:
Bala L wrote:
I have a class with a private array data member 'm_array'. I have
written a public function, called 'fileRead', to read values into the
array from a file. I just noticed that I have declared this function
to be const.
I dont understand how the code compiled and executed without returning
an error or a warning. I am assigning values from a file to m_array
inside this function. I thought that a member function can be made
const only if *this (this pointer) is not being modified. Am I missing
something?
I don't know. What *we* are missing is the actual code. For all we
know the alleged "array" could be a pointer to a dynamic array. Then
when you're modifying the elements (by assigning to them), you aren't
changing the instance, only the memory to which the pointer points.
Read the FAQ 5.8.
Btw, I am using the Visual C++ .NET environment to run the code.
That shouldn't matter.
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
Yes, the array is dynamically created.
Since the this-pointer is supposed to be maintained constant by
declaring the member function to be const, I thought all the class
members will be maintained constant. Does this mean that the const-ness
is only defined for non-pointer datatypes?
Bala L wrote:
Victor Bazarov wrote:
>Bala L wrote:
>>I have a class with a private array data member 'm_array'. I have written a public function, called 'fileRead', to read values into the array from a file. I just noticed that I have declared this function to be const.
I dont understand how the code compiled and executed without returning an error or a warning. I am assigning values from a file to m_array inside this function. I thought that a member function can be made const only if *this (this pointer) is not being modified. Am I missing something?
I don't know. What *we* are missing is the actual code. For all we know the alleged "array" could be a pointer to a dynamic array. Then when you're modifying the elements (by assigning to them), you aren't changing the instance, only the memory to which the pointer points.
Read the FAQ 5.8.
>>Btw, I am using the Visual C++ .NET environment to run the code.
That shouldn't matter.
V -- Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
Yes, the array is dynamically created.
Since the this-pointer is supposed to be maintained constant by
declaring the member function to be const, I thought all the class
members will be maintained constant. Does this mean that the
const-ness is only defined for non-pointer datatypes?
What are you talking about? Your pointer remains constant. What
it points to was never declared constant in the first place. In the
member function declared 'const', the 'this' is const, and so is every
*immediate* object you can refer to using 'this':
void foo_const_membe r() const {
this->somepointer = &someotherobjec t; // cannot do that
this->somepointer[42] = 10; // no problem
}
IOW, declaring a member function 'const' instructs your compiler to
flag every attempt to change a *member* of that class. Elements of
an array to which your pointer points are *NOT* members of your
object. They are fair game.
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
Bala L wrote:
I have a class with a private array data member 'm_array'. I have
written a public function, called 'fileRead', to read values into the
array from a file. I just noticed that I have declared this function to
be const.
I dont understand how the code compiled and executed without returning
an error or a warning. I am assigning values from a file to m_array
inside this function. I thought that a member function can be made
const only if *this (this pointer) is not being modified. Am I missing
something?
Btw, I am using the Visual C++ .NET environment to run the code.
When you have a pointer as a data member, the pointer itself is made
const when you are in a const function but the const-ness is not
propogated to pointee. Thus:
class A
{
int *pi;
// ...
void Foo() const
{
pi = 0; // Error, pi is const
*pi = 0; // Ok, *pi is non-const
}
void Foo()
{
pi = 0; // Ok, pi is non-const
*pi = 0; // Ok, *pi is non-const
}
};
If you want const to be propogated, use a container such as
std::vector. In fact, you should almost certainly be using such a
container for dynamically allocated arrays anyway (see http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lit...html#faq-34.1).
Cheers! --M
mlimber wrote:
Bala L wrote:
I have a class with a private array data member 'm_array'. I have
written a public function, called 'fileRead', to read values into the
array from a file. I just noticed that I have declared this function to
be const.
I dont understand how the code compiled and executed without returning
an error or a warning. I am assigning values from a file to m_array
inside this function. I thought that a member function can be made
const only if *this (this pointer) is not being modified. Am I missing
something?
Btw, I am using the Visual C++ .NET environment to run the code.
When you have a pointer as a data member, the pointer itself is made
const when you are in a const function but the const-ness is not
propogated to pointee. Thus:
class A
{
int *pi;
// ...
void Foo() const
{
pi = 0; // Error, pi is const
*pi = 0; // Ok, *pi is non-const
Wrong!!!, no memory is allocated for above statement to be true, you
could do
pi = new int;
*pi = 0; // Now OK
}
void Foo()
{
pi = 0; // Ok, pi is non-const
*pi = 0; // Ok, *pi is non-const
Same reason
}
};
If you want const to be propogated, use a container such as
std::vector. In fact, you should almost certainly be using such a
container for dynamically allocated arrays anyway (see http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lit...html#faq-34.1).
Cheers! --M
S S wrote:
mlimber wrote:
>Bala L wrote:
>>I have a class with a private array data member 'm_array'. I have written a public function, called 'fileRead', to read values into the array from a file. I just noticed that I have declared this function to be const.
I dont understand how the code compiled and executed without returning an error or a warning. I am assigning values from a file to m_array inside this function. I thought that a member function can be made const only if *this (this pointer) is not being modified. Am I missing something?
Btw, I am using the Visual C++ .NET environment to run the code.
When you have a pointer as a data member, the pointer itself is made const when you are in a const function but the const-ness is not propogated to pointee. Thus:
class A { int *pi;
// ...
void Foo() const { pi = 0; // Error, pi is const *pi = 0; // Ok, *pi is non-const
Wrong!!!, no memory is allocated for above statement to be true
[..]
WHAT? The "// ..." clearly contains the necessary code to allocate
all the necessary memory.
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
Looks like I confused pointer-to-a-constant with constant pointers.
Thanks for the clarification!
Victor Bazarov wrote:
S S wrote:
mlimber wrote:
Bala L wrote: I have a class with a private array data member 'm_array'. I have written a public function, called 'fileRead', to read values into the array from a file. I just noticed that I have declared this function to be const.
I dont understand how the code compiled and executed without returning an error or a warning. I am assigning values from a file to m_array inside this function. I thought that a member function can be made const only if *this (this pointer) is not being modified. Am I missing something?
Btw, I am using the Visual C++ .NET environment to run the code.
When you have a pointer as a data member, the pointer itself is made
const when you are in a const function but the const-ness is not
propogated to pointee. Thus:
class A
{
int *pi;
// ...
void Foo() const
{
pi = 0; // Error, pi is const
*pi = 0; // Ok, *pi is non-const
Wrong!!!, no memory is allocated for above statement to be true
[..]
WHAT? The "// ..." clearly contains the necessary code to allocate
all the necessary memory.
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: joe |
last post by:
hi,
after reading some articles and faq,
i want to clarify myself what's correct(conform to standard) and
what's not?
or what should be correct but it isn't simply because compilers don't
support.
(first i compiled them with g++3.x. ERR means compiler will bark,
otherwise it does accept it. Then the Comeau C/C++ 4.3.3 comes)
|
by: jsnX |
last post by:
i want a function object that is
a) initialized with an STL container foo
b) will search foo for an object of type foo::value_type
here is my code:
========================================================================
/* if we have a big list of things, and we went to check it
* over and over for this or that thing, then we can use this
* object to cache the list and consolidate queries of it.
|
by: tropostropos |
last post by:
On Solaris, using the Sun compiler, I get annoying warnings from the
following code. The problem is that I am passing a C++ member function
pointer to the C library function qsort. Is there a solution?
Declaring the function extern "C" fails, because linkage declarations
must be made at file scope.
#include <stdlib.h> //for qsort
template <class T>
class Sorter
|
by: Jiří Paleček |
last post by:
Hello,
I know the rules for const handling in C++, but I'd like to ask what is
the "right" way to use them, eg. when is it appropriate to make a member
function const?
This came across this question when I was thinking about implementation
of a class implementing some lazy data structure or cache. The C++ rules
allow among other possibilities making all member functions non-const,
or making all member functions const and all members...
|
by: Lionel B |
last post by:
I have a function which takes a functor argument. I which to call it for a
functor which is actually a class member; this works fine, using
the mem_fun_ref and bind1st functions (see listing 1 below). Or, rather,
it works fine as long as my member functor is const. The problem comes
when I wish to use it for a *non*-const functor (see listing 2 below):
*** Start listing 1 ***************************************************
// test1.cpp
| |
by: grizggg |
last post by:
I have searched and not found an answer to this question. I ran upon
the following statement in a *.cpp file in a member function:
static const char * const pacz_HTMLContentTypeHeader = "Content-Type:
text/html\r\n";
Why is the second const needed and what does it do?
Thanks
|
by: subramanian100in |
last post by:
The following is a beginner's question.
Suppose TYPE1 and TYPE2 are two types for which suitable ctors and
operator= are defined.
Suppose I have
class Test
{
TYPE1 mem1;
|
by: Angus |
last post by:
I have a member function, int GetLogLevel() which I thought I should
change to int GetLogLevel() const - I made the change and it works
fine.
But in the function I am creating buffers and of course the buffers
are filling up with data. So some variable values are changing. So
what is rule for a const member function? Is it that only member
variables cannot change? But local variables inside the function can?
|
by: hweekuan |
last post by:
hi,
it seems i can't assign the const variable u in class A, one way to
solve the problem may be to build a copy constructor. however, why
does C++ or vector class not like this code? my g++ is: gcc version
4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465). thanks for the help.
summary of compile error:
---------------------------------------
cpp.C:4: error: non-static const member 'const unsigned int A::u',
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
| |
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development projectplanning, coding, testing, and deploymentwithout human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupr who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |