We have three files a.c, b.c and main.c respectively as follows:
a.c
---
int a;
b.c
---
int a = 10;
main.c
------
extern int a;
int main()
{
printf("a = %d\n",a);
return 0;
}
Let's see what happens, when the files are compiled together:
bash$ gcc a.c b.c main.c
bash$ ./a.out
a = 10
Hmm!! no compilation/linker error!!! Why is it so?? 14 1695
On 19 Sep 2006 22:12:12 -0700, "sunny" <su*******@gmai l.comwrote in
comp.lang.c:
We have three files a.c, b.c and main.c respectively as follows:
a.c
---
int a;
b.c
---
int a = 10;
main.c
------
extern int a;
int main()
{
printf("a = %d\n",a);
return 0;
}
Let's see what happens, when the files are compiled together:
bash$ gcc a.c b.c main.c
bash$ ./a.out
a = 10
Hmm!! no compilation/linker error!!! Why is it so??
Your program produces undefined behavior by having more than one
definition of an external object. The compiler is free to do anything
it wants. Once you generate undefined behavior, the C language no
longer places any requirements on the results.
--
Jack Klein
Home: http://JK-Technology.Com
FAQs for
comp.lang.c http://c-faq.com/
comp.lang.c++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt.comp.lang.l earn.c-c++ http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~a...FAQ-acllc.html
Can anyone give a nice link of how these example works?
Jack Klein wrote:
On 19 Sep 2006 22:12:12 -0700, "sunny" <su*******@gmai l.comwrote in
comp.lang.c:
We have three files a.c, b.c and main.c respectively as follows:
a.c
---
int a;
b.c
---
int a = 10;
main.c
------
extern int a;
int main()
{
printf("a = %d\n",a);
return 0;
}
Let's see what happens, when the files are compiled together:
bash$ gcc a.c b.c main.c
bash$ ./a.out
a = 10
Hmm!! no compilation/linker error!!! Why is it so??
Your program produces undefined behavior by having more than one
definition of an external object. The compiler is free to do anything
it wants. Once you generate undefined behavior, the C language no
longer places any requirements on the results.
--
Jack Klein
Home: http://JK-Technology.Com
FAQs for
comp.lang.c http://c-faq.com/
comp.lang.c++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt.comp.lang.l earn.c-c++ http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~a...FAQ-acllc.html
Jack Klein wrote:
"sunny" <su*******@gmai l.comwrote in comp.lang.c:
We have three files a.c, b.c and main.c respectively as follows:
a.c
---
int a;
b.c
---
int a = 10;
main.c
------
extern int a;
int main()
{
printf("a = %d\n",a);
return 0;
}
Let's see what happens, when the files are compiled together:
bash$ gcc a.c b.c main.c
Note: gcc has not been invoked as a conforming compiler, so you
can't have any expectations under the C language standard.
bash$ ./a.out
a = 10
Hmm!! no compilation/linker error!!! Why is it so??
Your program produces undefined behavior by having more than one
definition of an external object. The compiler is free to do anything
it wants. Once you generate undefined behavior, the C language no
longer places any requirements on the results.
Or, to more accurately answer the OP's question, the behaviour is UB
by 6.9p5, however that paragraph is not one of the listed Contraints
for 6.9 [pp2-3], so no diagnostic is required.
Why it's not a constraint, I don't know.
--
Peter
Peter Nilsson wrote:
Jack Klein wrote:
"sunny" <su*******@gmai l.comwrote in comp.lang.c:
We have three files a.c, b.c and main.c respectively as follows:
a.c
---
int a;
b.c
---
int a = 10;
main.c
------
extern int a;
int main()
{
printf("a = %d\n",a);
return 0;
}
Let's see what happens, when the files are compiled together:
bash$ gcc a.c b.c main.c
Note: gcc has not been invoked as a conforming compiler, so you
can't have any expectations under the C language standard.
bash$ ./a.out
a = 10
Hmm!! no compilation/linker error!!! Why is it so??
Your program produces undefined behavior by having more than one
definition of an external object. The compiler is free to do anything
it wants. Once you generate undefined behavior, the C language no
longer places any requirements on the results.
Or, to more accurately answer the OP's question, the behaviour is UB
by 6.9p5, however that paragraph is not one of the listed Contraints
for 6.9 [pp2-3], so no diagnostic is required.
Why it's not a constraint, I don't know.
I imagine it's not a constraint because depending on the system, it may
not have an easy way to tell this apart from a definition whose name
matches that of a library function provided as an extension. In other
words, it could also generate a diagnostic for this legitimate code:
#include <stdio.h>
void write(char *s) { puts(s); }
int main(void) {
write("Hello, world!");
}
Hi All
but i get the compilation error if i initialize the variable "a" in a.c
ie.
// in a.c
int a = 200;
// in b.c
int a = 10.
on compilation, now i got multiple definition error.
may on first i.e uninitialized "a" will be stored in BSS section and
intialized "a" (a = 10) is stored in DS(data segment). so when i
intialize "a" in a.c
it will move to DS where it confilicts with "a" from b.c;
is it correct?
Peter Nilsson wrote:
Jack Klein wrote:
"sunny" <su*******@gmai l.comwrote in comp.lang.c:
We have three files a.c, b.c and main.c respectively as follows:
a.c
---
int a;
b.c
---
int a = 10;
main.c
------
extern int a;
int main()
{
printf("a = %d\n",a);
return 0;
}
Let's see what happens, when the files are compiled together:
bash$ gcc a.c b.c main.c
Note: gcc has not been invoked as a conforming compiler, so you
can't have any expectations under the C language standard.
bash$ ./a.out
a = 10
Hmm!! no compilation/linker error!!! Why is it so??
Your program produces undefined behavior by having more than one
definition of an external object. The compiler is free to do anything
it wants. Once you generate undefined behavior, the C language no
longer places any requirements on the results.
Or, to more accurately answer the OP's question, the behaviour is UB
by 6.9p5, however that paragraph is not one of the listed Contraints
for 6.9 [pp2-3], so no diagnostic is required.
Why it's not a constraint, I don't know.
--
Peter
On 19 Sep 2006 23:59:33 -0700, "sunny" <su*******@gmai l.comwrote in
comp.lang.c:
Hi All
but i get the compilation error if i initialize the variable "a" in a.c
ie.
// in a.c
int a = 200;
// in b.c
int a = 10.
on compilation, now i got multiple definition error.
may on first i.e uninitialized "a" will be stored in BSS section and
intialized "a" (a = 10) is stored in DS(data segment). so when i
intialize "a" in a.c
it will move to DS where it confilicts with "a" from b.c;
is it correct?
It is not correct. It is not incorrect. Once you produce undefined
behavior, the C standard no longer specifies what the program must do.
As far as the C language is concerned, anything that happens is just
as correct or incorrect as anything else.
You have broken a rule of C programming. Don't do that. Then you
won't have to worry whether what happens is correct.
--
Jack Klein
Home: http://JK-Technology.Com
FAQs for
comp.lang.c http://c-faq.com/
comp.lang.c++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt.comp.lang.l earn.c-c++ http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~a...FAQ-acllc.html
"sunny" <su*******@gmai l.comwrites:
We have three files a.c, b.c and main.c respectively as follows:
a.c
---
int a;
b.c
---
int a = 10;
main.c
------
extern int a;
int main()
{
printf("a = %d\n",a);
return 0;
}
Let's see what happens, when the files are compiled together:
bash$ gcc a.c b.c main.c
bash$ ./a.out
a = 10
Hmm!! no compilation/linker error!!! Why is it so??
With gnu linker, use -Wl,--warn-common. That's the (sloppy) common unix
practice.
A+
--
Jean-Marc
The variable is defined / initialised in two separate files. Each of
these C files will be compiled to object code. At the linking phase,
the linker usually has a specific order in which it searches for
external symbols, e.g. start with all the objects/libraries in current
folder in alphabetical order, followed by the so-called default paths
where other libraries and objects may reside. All the linkers I've
used, by default, will stop looking for an external reference if one
has already been found in an object or a library. Therefore, in this
case, it so happened that the linker encountered the definition with
initialisation first, hence the value 10 is displayed at execution. I
suppose a closer investigation of the linker properties would provide a
clear answer to this issue. Changing the initialisation from one file
to the other may exhibit a different behaviour (or at least I expect
to).
Romeo Ghiriti
The variable is defined / initialised in two separate files. Each of
these C files will be compiled to object code. At the linking phase,
the linker usually has a specific order in which it searches for
external symbols, e.g. start with all the objects/libraries in current
folder in alphabetical order, followed by the so-called default paths
where other libraries and objects may reside. All the linkers I've
used, by default, will stop looking for an external reference if one
has already been found in an object or a library. Therefore, in this
case, it so happened that the linker encountered the definition with
initialisation first, hence the value 10 is displayed at execution. I
suppose a closer investigation of the linker properties would provide a
clear answer to this issue. Changing the initialisation from one file
to the other may exhibit a different behaviour (or at least I expect
to).
Romeo Ghiriti This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: konf |
last post by:
Hallo,
I tried to compile PGSQL 7.4 and I got error (durring make):
ar: command not found
What is it? Whe I can found it?
I have:
$ uname -a
SunOS ... 5.8 Generic_108528-03 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine
|
by: Sune |
last post by:
Hi,
previously I used Eclipse CDT for compiling my files just to get
started with C and leave C++ behind. Now it's time to get a little more
serious so I've moved my files to a new workplace and begun to use GNU
Autotools. I'm sorry to say I'm new to gcc as well :(
Now I get the most ridiculous compile error which I'm unable to solve.
Can someone, please, help me with this? gcc output together with the
files mentioned in the gcc error...
|
by: Joachim |
last post by:
I made some project changes (which seems it doesn't help if I undo) which
have created compilation error:
"
Server Error in '/PCSWebApp1' Application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compilation Error
Description: An error occurred during the compilation of a resource required
to service this request. Please review the following specific error details
|
by: James Zhuo |
last post by:
Hi all
I've been getting the following compilation error. I should explain the
background of the project that i am taking over. This is a project that has
been developed by someone else a while ago using dreamweaver, I am basically
trying to migrate the project into a Visual Studio .NET environment before I
start enhancing it.
Any suggestions on where the source of error may be would be greatly
appreciated.
|
by: James Zhuo |
last post by:
hi all
I changed the name of the class LoginPage to a different
name "LoginPageOne" But the same error gets generated with
the Wiliam.Request.LoginPageOne. That pretty much leaves
me clueless at this point.
Please help
Cheer
| |
by: Dan |
last post by:
Hi,
I have a problem using an aspx page with a Control on it. I get the
following error message
Compiler Error Message: CS1595: 'Test.Class2' is defined in multiple
places; using definition from
'c:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\Temporary ASP.NET
Files\root\1f575646\ad3a161b\assembly\dl2\57ca505e\044565c0_f84fc401\Test1.DLL'
The problem is that the control is defined in two different assemblies
|
by: Plat |
last post by:
I've Googled this for a while, to no avail. Hopefully someone can help me.
Maybe I'm using the wrong terminology.
Here's the scoop! Let's say I've got a simple *.ASPX page that has a syntax
error. For example, broken.aspx might only contain the following line of code:
<% Dim x as %>
When I visit this page from my Web browser, I see all the helpful ASP.NET
Server Error information, including:
|
by: Robert |
last post by:
I have a number of web projects converted from 1.1 to 2.0 in VS2005.
I am methodically seeing the error below:
The element 'compilation' has invalid child element 'compilers'. List of
possible elements expected: 'assemblies, buildProviders, codeSubDirectories,
expressionBuilders'.
Here's what the web config looks like. The error doesn't cause any issues
and according to the MSDN documentation this is valid. So why is VS2005
|
by: Stimp |
last post by:
I've created an aspx page called HistoryManage.aspx.
The page works fine on my local machine but when I load it off the web I
get the following strange error...
Compilation Error
Description: An error occurred during the compilation of a resource
required to service this request. Please review the following specific
error details and modify your source code appropriately.
|
by: BSand0764 |
last post by:
I'm getting an error that I can't seem to resolve. When I compile the
Functor related logic in a test program, the files compile and execute
properly (see Listing #1).
However, when I incorporate the same logic within my simulation, the
class that implements the functor logic has problems compiling. I get
the following errors:
-- Building myTest.cpp --
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
| |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| |
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
|
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |