Quick question on operator overloading

[John]

I always understood that in C++, if I said

a + b

a.operator+(b) is called.

Now this makes sense with the operator<< when used in the following way

cout << 100; // converts to cout.operator<< (100);

but then how does one explain this one

cout << end; // endl(cout).

In what order does C++ look for operator functions? What all
functions does it search before giving up? In other words

when C++ sees

a+b

does it look for the existence of :

a.operator(b)
b(a)
a(b) ....???

or is the operator<< a special case?

Thanks,
--j

[Markus Grueneis]

John schrieb:

I always understood that in C++, if I said

[snipped]

but then how does one explain this one

cout << end; // endl(cout).

You can overload operator<< with functors.

For instance (assuming boost::function ):

struct blub {
// ... data member
blub& operator<<(boos t::function<voi d (blub&)fn)
{
fn(*this);
return *this;
}
};

You get the idea.

-mg

In what order does C++ look for operator functions? What all
functions does it search before giving up? In other words

when C++ sees

a+b

does it look for the existence of :

a.operator(b)
b(a)
a(b) ....???

or is the operator<< a special case?

Thanks,
--j

[John]

Sorry, but I do not understand.
Is endl a functor? Does the rule of
operator overloading change in case of functors?

Thanks,
--j
Markus Grueneis wrote:

John schrieb:

I always understood that in C++, if I said

[snipped]

but then how does one explain this one

cout << end; // endl(cout).

You can overload operator<< with functors.

For instance (assuming boost::function ):

struct blub {
// ... data member
blub& operator<<(boos t::function<voi d (blub&)fn)
{
fn(*this);
return *this;
}
};

You get the idea.

-mg

In what order does C++ look for operator functions? What all
functions does it search before giving up? In other words

when C++ sees

a+b

does it look for the existence of :

a.operator(b)
b(a)
a(b) ....???

or is the operator<< a special case?

Thanks,
--j

[Frederick Gotham]

John posted:

Now this makes sense with the operator<< when used in the following way

cout << 100; // converts to cout.operator<< (100);

but then how does one explain this one

cout << end; // endl(cout).

I searched the Standard for "endl" and found:

template <class charT, class traits>
basic_ostream<c harT,traits>& endl(basic_ostr eam<charT,trait s>& os);

I'm not sure exactly how it works, but if I had to guess, I'd say it might
be something like:

class OStream {
public:

OStream &operator<<(cha r const *const p)
{
/* Print text */

return *this;
}

OStream &operator<<(OSt ream &(&Func)(OStrea m&))
{
return Func(*this);
}
};

OStream &endl(OStrea m &os)
{
return os << "\n";
}

int main()
{
OStream cout;

cout << "Hello" << endl;
}

--

Frederick Gotham

[Markus Grueneis]

John schrieb:

Sorry, but I do not understand.
Is endl a functor? Does the rule of

Yes.

operator overloading change in case of functors?

No, as I showed you, it works absolutly the same way.

>
Thanks,
--j

Please avoid top posting.

Markus Grueneis wrote:

>John schrieb:
[snipped old stuff]

>>but then how does one explain this one

cout << end; // endl(cout).

You can overload operator<< with functors.

For instance (assuming boost::function ):

struct blub {
// ... data member
blub& operator<<(boos t::function<voi d (blub&)fn)
{
fn(*this);
return *this;
}
};

You get the idea.

As Frederick Gotham wrote, endl is this:

template <class charT, class traits>
basic_ostream<c harT,traits>& endl(basic_ostr eam<charT,trait s>& os);

For the sake of easier redability, let's take:

ostream& endl (ostream& os)

So it has the type

ostream& (ostream&)

The first ostream& means the return value, the (ostream&) the argument
list of the functor.

Now, everything that has to be provided, either as a class member or an
ordinary function, is an overloaded operator<< taking the previously
shown types as argument.

Again, as Frederick wrote (modified by me to match the class names):

ostream& operator<<(ostr eam& (&Func)(ostream &))
{
return Func(*this);
}

This would be a member function of ostream matching the required types.
"ostream& (&Func)(ostream &)" identified the function argument named
"Func", which must have the type "ostream& (ostream&)". std::endl is
exactly such a function matching this type. So, here you are.

[snipped old stuff]

[Greg Comeau]

In article <11************ *********@74g20 00cwt.googlegro ups.com>,
John <we**********@y ahoo.comwrote:

>I always understood that in C++, if I said

a + b

a.operator+( b) is called.

Now this makes sense with the operator<< when used in the following way

cout << 100; // converts to cout.operator<< (100);

but then how does one explain this one

cout << end; // endl(cout).

op<< (not all but the one you're talkign about) is overloaded with many
signatures, taking int, float, etc. One overload accepts an argumwnt
that has a type that is the same as endl's type. Check out the header file.
--
Greg Comeau / 20 years of Comeauity! Intel Mac Port now in alpha!
Comeau C/C++ ONLINE == http://www.comeaucomputing.com/tryitout
World Class Compilers: Breathtaking C++, Amazing C99, Fabulous C90.
Comeau C/C++ with Dinkumware's Libraries... Have you tried it?

[Thomas J. Gritzan]

Frederick Gotham schrieb:

I searched the Standard for "endl" and found:

template <class charT, class traits>
basic_ostream<c harT,traits>& endl(basic_ostr eam<charT,trait s>& os);

[...]

OStream &endl(OStrea m &os)
{
return os << "\n";
}

std::endl flushes the stream, like this:

ostream& endl(ostream& os)
{
os << '\n';
os.flush();
return os;
}

--
Thomas

[Jim Langston]

"John" <we**********@y ahoo.comwrote in message
news:11******** *************@7 4g2000cwt.googl egroups.com...

>I always understood that in C++, if I said

a + b

a.operator+(b) is called.

Now this makes sense with the operator<< when used in the following way

cout << 100; // converts to cout.operator<< (100);

but then how does one explain this one

cout << end; // endl(cout).

In what order does C++ look for operator functions? What all
functions does it search before giving up? In other words

when C++ sees

a+b

does it look for the existence of :

a.operator(b)
b(a)
a(b) ....???

or is the operator<< a special case?

Thanks,
--j

Here is my compilers definition of std::endl:
template<class _Elem, class _Traitsinline
basic_ostream<_ Elem, _Traits>&
__cdecl endl(basic_ostr eam<_Elem, _Traits>& _Ostr)
{ // insert newline and flush stream
_Ostr.put(_Ostr .widen('\n'));
_Ostr.flush();
return (_Ostr);
}