Hi C experts
I've a bunch of questions.
Consider this simplified piece of code.
const int a = 10;
int main () {
static int b = a;
return b;
}
~>gcc test.c
test.c: In function `main':
test.c:4: error: initializer element is not constant
~>
Question1
I understand that const is 'read-only' but I could not convince my
co-worker that its value can change.
6.7.8 Initialization
[...]
[#4] All the expressions in an initializer for an object
that has static storage duration shall be constant
expressions or string literals.
Can someone point me to text that says that 'const' is not 'constant
expression' and can in fact change?
He claims that the compiler may choose to substitute the value at
compile time.
I tried to explain how the value can change (but I had to use pointers
to const int) which he shot down saying the comparison of examples is
not valid (it's not initializer and it involves pointers).
Question2
Moreover, if we turn on optimization, (and assume that the real code
does not have any dead code like above), the compiler does not give any
error. Is the compiler correct after optimisation?
I think it is a bug in compiler but I need text in standard to prove
that.
Thanks in advance for your comments
-Dev 13 2560 de**********@ya hoo.com <de**********@y ahoo.com> a écrit*: I've a bunch of questions. Consider this simplified piece of code.
const int a = 10; int main () { static int b = a; return b; }
~>gcc test.c test.c: In function `main': test.c:4: error: initializer element is not constant ~>
Question1 I understand that const is 'read-only' but I could not convince my co-worker that its value can change.
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv []) {
assert( argc > 0 );
const int a= atoi(argv[1]);
static int b= a;
return b;
}
Marc Boyer de**********@ya hoo.com wrote: const int a = 10;
int main () { static int b = a; return b; }
~>gcc test.c test.c: In function `main': test.c:4: error: initializer element is not constant ~>
Question1 I understand that const is 'read-only' but I could not convince my co-worker that its value can change.
Whether or not it can is of no import to that error. It is not a
constant, as defined by the Standard. That's all that matters.
<http://c-faq.com/ansi/constasconst.ht ml>.
6.7.8 Initialization
[...]
[#4] All the expressions in an initializer for an object that has static storage duration shall be constant expressions or string literals.
Can someone point me to text that says that 'const' is not 'constant expression' and can in fact change?
Any object, whether const or not, is not a constant expression: 6.6.
"Can in fact change": immaterial.
He claims that the compiler may choose to substitute the value at compile time.
He may claim whatever he wants. It remains a const object, not a
constant expression, and is therefore not a portable initaliser.
Moreover, if we turn on optimization, (and assume that the real code does not have any dead code like above), the compiler does not give any error. Is the compiler correct after optimisation?
By 6.6#10, yes. However, no other compiler (nor even the same compiler
the next time) is required to accept its extensions.
Richard
Thanks Marc, point noted.
Now getting back to my example,
const int a = 10;
In this case, can value of 'a' change? If so how?
If not, why can not variable 'a' be treated a compile time constant.
-Dev
Le 19-04-2006, de**********@ya hoo.com <de**********@y ahoo.com> a écrit*: Thanks Marc, point noted.
Now getting back to my example,
const int a = 10;
In this case, can value of 'a' change?
Not to my knowledge.
If so how? If not, why can not variable 'a' be treated a compile time constant.
It 'can' in this case. But, just try to explain in wich case
it can and when it can not....
Marc Boyer
--
Si tu peux supporter d'entendre tes paroles
Travesties par des gueux pour exciter des sots
IF -- Rudyard Kipling (Trad. Paul Éluard)
If the compiler can treat this 'a' as a compile time constant then this
should also work
const int size = 5;
int array[size];
But seems like it does not compile even with optimizations.
This is causing confusion.
-Dev
Marc Boyer wrote: Le 19-04-2006, de**********@ya hoo.com <de**********@y ahoo.com> a écrit : Thanks Marc, point noted.
Now getting back to my example,
const int a = 10;
In this case, can value of 'a' change?
Not to my knowledge.
Isn't this legal?
==========
#include <stdio.h>
const int a = 10;
int main(int argc,char *argv[])
{
int *pt = (int *)&a;
printf("%d\n",a );
*pt = 20;
printf("%d\n",a );
}
==========
It fails here, at runtime, but only because "a" has been placed into
read-only memory on this platform. But it's perfectly "legal" C, as
far as I know. It compiles without even a warning about "pt" and "a",
even with maximum warnings turned on.
[...]
--
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+
| Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | |
| kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | #include <std_disclaimer .h> |
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+
Don't e-mail me at: <mailto:Th***** ********@gmail. com> de**********@ya hoo.com wrote: If the compiler can treat this 'a' as a compile time constant then this should also work
Please read the information below.
Brian
--
Please quote enough of the previous message for context. To do so from
Google, click "show options" and use the Reply shown in the expanded
header.
Kenneth Brody wrote: Isn't this legal?
==========
#include <stdio.h>
const int a = 10;
int *pt = (int *)&a;
It fails here, at runtime, but only because "a" has been placed into read-only memory on this platform. But it's perfectly "legal" C, as far as I know. It compiles without even a warning about "pt" and "a", even with maximum warnings turned on.
What do you mean by "legal"? It doesn't require a diagnostic, but it's
undefined behavior.
Brian de**********@ya hoo.com wrote:
Please provide context when replying. Usenet is not Google Groups,
Google Groups is merely on of many Usenet service provides that provides
a poor interface. There is no guarantee that others have (or ever will)
see the post you are replying to. If the compiler can treat this 'a' as a compile time constant then this should also work
const int size = 5; int array[size];
But seems like it does not compile even with optimizations.
This is causing confusion.
Basically, you can't do it because the standard says you can't. const in
C is a promise that you will not attempt to modify something, it does
not declare a real constant. So, for example, you can do:
volatile const int fred;
Then, you might be able to use some magic in your linker to map fred
over a hardware register and each time you read it you will get the
current contents of that register.
Note that C99 added variable length arrays, so in C99 you could do:
int main(void)
{
const int size = 5;
int array[size];
/* do stuff */
return 0;
}
However, in the above array is a variable length array where the length
is determined at run time, not a normal fixed length array.
--
Flash Gordon, living in interesting times.
Web site - http://home.flash-gordon.me.uk/
comp.lang.c posting guidelines and intro: http://clc-wiki.net/wiki/Intro_to_clc This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Ben |
last post by:
For many times, I've found myself changing my member variables from
const back to non-const. No matter how good the original objective
was, there was always at least one reason not to use const members.
(swap, storing it in a container, etc.)
Whereas in Java, 80% of the case, I would want "final" for my instance
variables.
It makes me think that is "const member variable" ever useful in C++?
Maybe because of the value semantics of C++...
|
by: herbertF |
last post by:
Hi guys,
In a program (not my own) I encountered the declaration of a constant
pointer to an array consisting of two other const pointers to arrays.
Not quite sure why they do it so complicated, but is it legal? Most
compilers accept it, but one doesn't recognize the rhs as a constant.
What are the requirements for the rhs in the declaration of a const
pointer? Is the following program legal C?
int main(int argc, char *argv) {
|
by: sarathy |
last post by:
Hi,
Can anyone just help me with what exactly is constant
expression. I read the section on Constant expression in K&R2. i am not
fully clear with it.
|
by: Rui.Hu719 |
last post by:
Hi, All:
I read the following passage from a book:
"There are three exceptions to the rule that headers should not contain
definitions: classes, const objects whose value is known at compile
time, and inline functions are all defined in headers. "
Can someone explain to me why some of the const objects must be defined
in the header file?
|
by: d3x0xr |
last post by:
---- Section 1 ----
------
x.c
int main( void )
{
char **a;
char const *const *b;
b = a; // line(9)
| |
by: jaime |
last post by:
Hi again all.
Given the line:
const int x=5;
Can I then use "x" as a constant expression? (By "constant expression", I
mean "constant expression" as defined in the C99 standard)
I've been searching google for 2 days now trying to answer this myself,
and I'm just getting more and more confused (some things I read make me
think "yes", while some things I read make me think "no").
|
by: Stephen Howe |
last post by:
Hi
Just going over some grey areas in my knowledge in C++:
1) If I have
const int SomeConst = 1;
in a header file, it is global, and it is included in multiple translations
units, but it is unused, I know that it does not take up storage in the
|
by: abendstund |
last post by:
Hi,
I have the following code and trouble with ambiguity due to operator
overloading..
The code is also at http://paste.nn-d.de/441
snip>>
|
by: arnuld |
last post by:
I have declared an int as const but compiler still says that it is not a
const:
include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main()
{
const int MAXSIZE = 100;
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
| |
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |