Actual C++ Library Source Code

[Tomás]

Is there anywhere on the internet where you can download actual source
code of an implementation of the C++ library? Stuff like:

namespace std {
class string {
// actual code in here
}
}
-Tomás

[Marcus Kwok]

"Tom?s" <NU**@null.null > wrote:

Is there anywhere on the internet where you can download actual source
code of an implementation of the C++ library?

I would imagine STLPort provides this:
http://www.stlport.org/

--
Marcus Kwok

[Roberto Waltman]

"Tomás" <NU**@NULL.NULL > wrote:

Is there anywhere on the internet where you can download actual source
code of an implementation of the C++ library? Stuff like:

namespace std {
class string {
// actual code in here
}
}
-Tomás

All 'big' open source operating systems make available the full source
code for their libraries. Go to the web sites for any Linux
distribution, NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, minix, OpenSolaris, etc.
For the STL in particular, search for STLport.

[Phlip]

Tomás wrote:

Is there anywhere on the internet where you can download actual source
code of an implementation of the C++ library? Stuff like:

namespace std {
class string {
// actual code in here
}
}

Besides STLport?

--
Phlip
http://www.greencheese.org/ZeekLand <-- NOT a blog!!!

[red floyd]

Phlip wrote:

Tom�s wrote:

Is there anywhere on the internet where you can download actual source
code of an implementation of the C++ library? Stuff like:

namespace std {
class string {
// actual code in here
}
}

Besides STLport?

Well, there's GNU as well...

[Bronek Kozicki]

Phlip <ph*******@gmai l.com> wrote:

Besides STLport?

maybe this http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/ ?
B.

[Walter Bright]

Phlip wrote:

Tom�s wrote:

Is there anywhere on the internet where you can download actual source
code of an implementation of the C++ library? Stuff like:

namespace std {
class string {
// actual code in here
}
}

Besides STLport?

Although it's not free, the Digital Mars C++ compiler CD comes with full
library source code. For a free version, there is of course the gnu
implementation.

-Walter Bright
www.digitalmars.com C, C++, D programming language compilers

[Daniel T.]

In article <GO************ ******@news.ind igo.ie>,
"Tomás" <NU**@NULL.NULL > wrote:

Is there anywhere on the internet where you can download actual source
code of an implementation of the C++ library? Stuff like:

namespace std {
class string {
// actual code in here
}
}

I can't believe no one mentioned this one.
<http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/>

It's based on Hewlett-Packard's original code (as is gnu's version I
believe...)
--
Magic depends on tradition and belief. It does not welcome observation,
nor does it profit by experiment. On the other hand, science is based
on experience; it is open to correction by observation and experiment.

[Roberto Waltman]

"Daniel T." <po********@ver izon.net> wrote:

"Tomás" <NU**@NULL.NULL > wrote:

Is there anywhere on the internet where you can download actual source
code of an implementation of the C++ library? Stuff like:

I can't believe no one mentioned this one.
<http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/>

It's based on Hewlett-Packard's original code (as is gnu's version I
believe...)

I always thought of STLport, (that I and others mentioned,) as a
better, more up-to-date version of SGI's STL, on which it is based.

Are there any reasons to prefer SGI's STL over STLport?

[Daniel T.]

In article <09************ *************** *****@4ax.com>,
Roberto Waltman <us****@rwaltma n.net> wrote:

"Daniel T." <po********@ver izon.net> wrote:

"Tomás" <NU**@NULL.NULL > wrote:

Is there anywhere on the internet where you can download actual source
code of an implementation of the C++ library? Stuff like:

I can't believe no one mentioned this one.
<http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/>

It's based on Hewlett-Packard's original code (as is gnu's version I
believe...)

I always thought of STLport, (that I and others mentioned,) as a
better, more up-to-date version of SGI's STL, on which it is based.

Are there any reasons to prefer SGI's STL over STLport?

I'm thinking that Tomas wants to study the code to see how it works and
I expect that SGI's version is probably simpler than STLport (though I
could be wrong, I see now that SGI does still revise theirs.)

I think it would be most instructive for Tomas to try to implement his
own STL. :-)
--
Magic depends on tradition and belief. It does not welcome observation,
nor does it profit by experiment. On the other hand, science is based
on experience; it is open to correction by observation and experiment.