Hi, all:
Recently I found this comment on comp.lang.c "Answers to FAQ" (6.13):
If you really need to declare a pointer to an entire array, use
something like "int (*ap)[N];" where N is the size of the array. (See
also question 1.21.) If the size of the array is unknown, N can in
principle be omitted, but the resulting type, "pointer to array of
unknown size," is useless.
However, when I try to write a sample program like:
int main()
{
int (*arrptr)[5];
int arr[5] = {1,2,3,4,5};
arrptr = arr;
printf( "%d", arrptr[0] );
}
Why could it not work? Besides, does anyone know the real usage of
array pointers?
Best regards,
blue 14 2212
blue schreef: Hi, all: Recently I found this comment on comp.lang.c "Answers to FAQ" (6.13): If you really need to declare a pointer to an entire array, use something like "int (*ap)[N];" where N is the size of the array.
In C++ i would recommend it. Unfortunately, it's not valid C.
(See also question 1.21.) If the size of the array is unknown, N can in principle be omitted, but the resulting type, "pointer to array of unknown size," is useless.
However, when I try to write a sample program like:
int main() { int (*arrptr)[5]; int arr[5] = {1,2,3,4,5}; arrptr = arr; printf( "%d", arrptr[0] ); }
Why could it not work?
Coz' it's not C.
int main() { int *arrptr; int arr[5] = {1,2,3,4,5}; arrptr = arr; printf( "%d", arrptr[0] ); }
Besides, does anyone know the real usage of array pointers?
There are many uses for them. printf, for instance, usually takes an
array pointer as it's first parameter, "%d" in your case. You can
calculate a pointer to any element in the array by arrptr=arr + i.
Except for the fact that they always point to some valid block of
memory (as long as they're in scope), array-pointers do not differ from
any other pointer.
regards,
Kleuske
blue wrote: Hi, all: Recently I found this comment on comp.lang.c "Answers to FAQ" (6.13): If you really need to declare a pointer to an entire array, use something like "int (*ap)[N];" where N is the size of the array. (See also question 1.21.) If the size of the array is unknown, N can in principle be omitted, but the resulting type, "pointer to array of unknown size," is useless.
However, when I try to write a sample program like:
#include <stdio.h>
This is _not_ gratuitous.
int main() { int (*arrptr)[5]; int arr[5] = {1,2,3,4,5}; arrptr = arr;
What is that? If you have
int *p, i;
then you use
p = &i;
So, your compiler should tell you that
arrptr = arr;
is wrong. Using the above,
arrptr = &arr;
is right.
printf( "%d", arrptr[0] );
Instead of p[0], you can also write *p. So, essentially, you
are trying to print out an array using %d. I hope you are
aware that this is a stupid idea.
What you probably want is
arrptr[0][0]
or, in this case,
(*arrptr)[0]
Notes: You could also use arrptr to access an array N of an
array 5 of int -- maybe this helps you better to understand
the "[0][0]"...
Another thing: To make this program portable, append '\n'
to your last output, i.e. "%d\n" or a separate putchar('\n');
You forgot to
return 0; }
Why could it not work? Besides, does anyone know the real usage of array pointers?
See above. Yes.
Cheers
Michael
--
E-Mail: Mine is an /at/ gmx /dot/ de address. kl*****@xs4all. nl wrote: blue schreef:
Hi, all: Recently I found this comment on comp.lang.c "Answers to FAQ" (6.13): If you really need to declare a pointer to an entire array, use something like "int (*ap)[N];" where N is the size of the array.
In C++ i would recommend it. Unfortunately, it's not valid C.
This is wrong.
In comp.lang.c, I do not officially know about C++ but, used
correctly, "this" is definitely valid C -- the reason why
the whole thing went into the _comp.lang.c_ FAQ.
See also my other reply to this thread.
Cheers
Michael
--
E-Mail: Mine is an /at/ gmx /dot/ de address.
Thanks for your reply, but I have some questions. Do you mean that if I
declared an array pointer, I will never have "array index out-of-bound"
problem? Can C (C++ you meantioned) do such examinations? I think only
object-oriented language, such as JAVA, will do.
Best regards,
blue
blue wrote: Hi, all: Recently I found this comment on comp.lang.c "Answers to FAQ" (6.13): If you really need to declare a pointer to an entire array, use something like "int (*ap)[N];" where N is the size of the array. (See also question 1.21.) If the size of the array is unknown, N can in principle be omitted, but the resulting type, "pointer to array of unknown size," is useless.
However, when I try to write a sample program like:
int main() { int (*arrptr)[5]; int arr[5] = {1,2,3,4,5}; arrptr = arr; printf( "%d", arrptr[0] ); }
Why could it not work? Besides, does anyone know the real usage of array pointers?
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
int (*arrptr)[5];
int arr[5] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
unsigned i;
arrptr = (int (*)[5]) arr;
for (i = 0; i < sizeof arr / sizeof *arr; i++)
printf("%d\n", (*arrptr)[i]);
return 0;
}
1
2
3
4
5
Hi, Michael:
I have tried what you suggested, it did work! However, It seems that
I have some misunderstandin g of array and pointers:
int arr[5] = {1,2,3,4,5};
int (*arrptr)[5];
Does it not mean that the variable "arr" itself is an "implicit"
pointer? So we could use it like *arr, *(arr+1), ... Besides, for an
array, does "&arr" really exist?
Then why I assign arr to arrptr is an illegal operation? Only "arrptr =
&arr" is legal.
Best regards,
blue
blue wrote: Thanks for your reply, but I have some questions. Do you mean that if I declared an array pointer, I will never have "array index out-of-bound" problem? Can C (C++ you meantioned) do such examinations? I think only object-oriented language, such as JAVA, will do.
Best regards,
blue
C will not detect array index out-of-bound.
But compiler will throw a warning if you try to assign address of a
different sized array to the pointer.
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 00:27:57 -0700, blue wrote:
[...] int arr[5] = {1,2,3,4,5}; int (*arrptr)[5];
Does it not mean that the variable "arr" itself is an "implicit" pointer? So we could use it like *arr, *(arr+1),
In most contexts, the array "arr" decays into a pointer, so generally yes
it can be used as you say. Read the FAQ for more details. This is often
referred to as "the rule", at least in this group.
... Besides, for an array, does "&arr" really exist?
It does, yes. This has been discussed on the list in the past, and
although they are different types, for meaningful conversions[*] we can
say that the value of arr and &arr is always the same.
Then why I assign arr to arrptr is an illegal operation? Only "arrptr = &arr" is legal.
Because they are different and incompatible types. arr is "array 5 of
int" and &arr is "pointer to array 5 of int".
[*] those conversions being at least to void * and probably char *.
i.e. (void *)arr == (void *)&arr
(char *)arr == (char *)&arr
-- http://members.dodo.com.au/~netocrat
blue wrote: Hi, all: Recently I found this comment on comp.lang.c "Answers to FAQ" (6.13):
<snip>
However, when I try to write a sample program like:
printf requires a prototype otherwise your program invokes undefined
behaviour and anything can happen.
#include <stdio.h>
int main() { int (*arrptr)[5]; int arr[5] = {1,2,3,4,5}; arrptr = arr; printf( "%d", arrptr[0] ); }
Why could it not work? Besides, does anyone know the real usage of array pointers?
You should always say what you mean by "does not work". In this case I
assume you mean that the compiler complains at you.
Think about what you would do with a pointer to an int. You would
dereference the pointer, would you not? The same applies to pointers to
arrays, if you want to read what they point to you need to dereference them.
printf( "%d", (*arrptr)[0] );
--
Flash Gordon
Living in interesting times.
Although my email address says spam, it is real and I read it. This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Bruno van Dooren |
last post by:
Hi All,
i have some (3) different weird pointer problems that have me stumped. i
suspect that the compiler behavior is correct because gcc shows the same
results.
----------------------------------------------
//example 1:
typedef int t_Array;
int main(int argc, char* argv)
|
by: Alexei A. Frounze |
last post by:
Hi all,
I have a question regarding the gcc behavior (gcc version 3.3.4).
On the following test program it emits a warning:
#include <stdio.h>
int aInt2 = {0,1,2,4,9,16};
int aInt3 = {0,1,2,4,9};
|
by: Wonder |
last post by:
Hello,
I'm confused by the pointer definition such as int *(p);
It seems if the parenthesis close p, it defines only 3 integers. The
star
is just useless. It can be showed by my program:
int main()
{
|
by: Jeff |
last post by:
I am struggling with the following
How do I marshal/access a pointer to an array of strings within a structure
Than
Jef
----------------------------------------------------------------
|
by: Martin Jørgensen |
last post by:
Hi,
"C primer plus" p.382:
Suppose we have this declaration:
int (*pa);
int ar1;
int ar2;
int **p2;
| |
by: Tomás |
last post by:
Some programmers treat arrays just like pointers (and some even think that
they're exactly equivalent). I'm going to demonstrate the differences.
Firstly, let's assume that we're working on a platform which has the
following properties:
1) char's are 8-Bit. ( "char" is synomonous with "byte" ).
2) int's are 32-Bit. ( sizeof(int) == 4 ).
3) Pointers are 64-Bit. ( sizeof(int*) == 8 ).
|
by: I.M. !Knuth |
last post by:
Hi. I'm more-or-less a C newbie. I thought I had pointers under control until
I started goofing around with this:
================================================================================
/* A function that returns a pointer-of-arrays to the calling function. */
#include <stdio.h>
int *pfunc(void);
|
by: gcary |
last post by:
I am having trouble figuring out how to declare a pointer to an array
of structures and initializing the pointer with a value. I've looked
at older posts in this group, and tried a solution that looked
sensible, but it didn't work right. Here is a simple example of what
I'm trying to accomplish:
// I have a hardware peripheral that I'm trying to access
// that has two ports. Each port has 10 sequential
// registers. Create a...
|
by: xdevel |
last post by:
Hi, if I have:
int a=100, b = 200, c = 300;
int *a = {&a, &b, &c};
than say that:
int **b is equal to int *a is correct????
|
by: aruna.mysore |
last post by:
Hi all,
I have a specific problem passing a function pointer array as a
parameter to a function. I am trying to use a function which takes a
function pointer array as an argument. I am too sure about the syntax
of calling the same.
#include <stdio.h>
void fp1()
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
| |
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |