functions and main

[Merrill & Michele]

The following progs differ only in the location of the prototype
(<--adjective) definition with respect to the main call. Both build and
behave for me. Is there a difference that amounts to something once the
subject matters gets stickier? MPJ
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void){
int i = 5;
void increment(int *);
increment(&i);
printf("i = %d\n",i);
return 0;
}
void increment(int *px){
int tmp = *px;
++ tmp;
*px = tmp;
}
#include <stdio.h>
void increment(int *);
int main(void){
int i = 5;
increment(&i);
printf("i = %d\n",i);
return 0;
}
void increment(int *px){
int tmp = *px;
++ tmp;
*px = tmp;
}

[Merrill & Michele]

"Prash" <pr****@rediffm ail.com> wrote in message
news:11******** **************@ c13g2000cwb.goo glegroups.com.. .

For a comprihensive definition of Foo have a look at RFC3092.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3092.html

Hilarious and enlightening. I must object to the contention that the
etymology of foobar entsteht aus 'furchtbar.' So laeuft det nich. MPJ