problem sending code via rs232

[Martin Petzold]

Hi,
i always resolve an "arrow up" instead an "A" when i do this (snipped!):

BYTE Byte;

Byte = 0x41;
PortWrite((BYTE )(&Byte));

BOOL PortWrite (BYTE Byte)
{
WriteFile (hPort, &Byte, sizeof (&Byte), NULL, NULL);
return TRUE;
}

what is the problem?

thx martin

[Martin Petzold]

resolve = receive

[Alf P. Steinbach]

* Martin Petzold <mp******@gmx.n et> schriebt:

This is off-topic in [comp.lang.c++].

Perhaps try [comp.os.ms-windows.program mer.win32]?

See the FAQ for some other possibilities & posting guidelines.

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

[Christopher Benson-Manica]

Martin Petzold <mp******@gmx.n et> spoke thus:

i always resolve an "arrow up" instead an "A" when i do this (snipped!):

What Mr. Steinbach said, and also never multi-post again.

--
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cybers pace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.

[E. Robert Tisdale]

Martin Petzold wrote:

I always resolve an "arrow up" instead an "A" when i do this (snipped!):

BYTE Byte;

Byte = 0x41;
PortWrite((BYTE )(&Byte));

BOOL PortWrite (BYTE Byte) {
WriteFile (hPort, &Byte, sizeof (&Byte), NULL, NULL);
return TRUE;
}

what is the problem?

You don't know what you are doing.

It appears that you are attempting to write the address of a BYTE
which contains the value 0x41.

[David Harmon]

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 18:14:56 GMT in comp.lang.c++, al***@start.no (Alf
P. Steinbach) wrote,

* Martin Petzold <mp******@gmx.n et> schriebt:

This is off-topic in [comp.lang.c++].

No it's not. The difference between a char, and the address of a char,
and the address of an array of chars, is not to be ignored in any
standard implementation of C++.

[Bill Thompson]

"Martin Petzold" <mp******@gmx.n et> wrote in message
news:c5******** **@newsreader2. netcologne.de.. .

Hi,
i always resolve an "arrow up" instead an "A" when i do this (snipped!):

BYTE Byte;

Byte = 0x41;
PortWrite((BYTE )(&Byte));

BOOL PortWrite (BYTE Byte)
{
WriteFile (hPort, &Byte, sizeof (&Byte), NULL, NULL);
return TRUE;
}

what is the problem?

thx martin

Assuming that WriteFile requires an address as the second parameter, and a
size as the third parameter, you are writing the size of an address rather
than the size of a byte.

Perhaps this will fix it:
WriteFile (hPort, &Byte, sizeof (Byte), NULL, NULL);

[Howard]

"Martin Petzold" <mp******@gmx.n et> wrote in message
news:c5******** **@newsreader2. netcologne.de.. .

Hi,
i always resolve an "arrow up" instead an "A" when i do this (snipped!):

BYTE Byte;

Byte = 0x41;
PortWrite((BYTE )(&Byte));
PortWrite takes a BYTE, not a pointer to a BYTE, so just pass it Byte, not
the address of Byte.

BOOL PortWrite (BYTE Byte)
{
WriteFile (hPort, &Byte, sizeof (&Byte), NULL, NULL);
If you're intending to write the value stored in Byte, then the size you
probably want is sizeof(BYTE), not the size of the address of the variable.
return TRUE;
}

what is the problem?

thx martin

Perhaps you want this?

PortWrite(Byte) ;
....
BOOL PortWrite( BYTE Byte )
{
WriteFile( hPort, &Byte, sizeof(BYTE), NULL, NULL );
....
}

?

-Howard

[red floyd]

al***@start.no (Alf P. Steinbach) wrote in message news:<40******* *********@news. individual.net> ...

* Martin Petzold <mp******@gmx.n et> schriebt:

This is off-topic in [comp.lang.c++].

Perhaps try [comp.os.ms-windows.program mer.win32]?

See the FAQ for some other possibilities & posting guidelines.

Aside from the fact that you're OT, you should use "sizeof(Byt e)"
instead of "sizeof(&Byte)" .