473,782 Members | 2,423 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

string concatenation

hi all,

i am writing a code in which i have a char buffer "cwdir[]"
which hold the current working directory by calling the function
getcwd(). later i change the directory to "/" as i have to make my
code Deamon. and later again i want to run some other executable
available at the path holded by the "cwdir[]" using the system()
system call. presently i concatenate program name (to be executed) to
the "cwdir[]" and use system(chdir)to run the program.

do we have any facility to automate this process as i need to run
many other programs also using the system() system call for ex as we
can use the ## symbol to cancatenate in macro ...

--shri
Nov 14 '05
37 8548

In article <8b************ **************@ posting.google. com>, ku****@wizard.n et (James Kuyper) writes:
mw*****@newsguy .com (Michael Wojcik) wrote in message news:<c0******* **@enews1.newsg uy.com>...
Presumably in at least some cases they could be provided by the
implementation, and in such a case programs using them would not
invoke UB, correct?
You need to be careful when you read the standard, it contains many
pieces of technical jargon which are defined by the standard itself to
mean something not quite the same as the ordinary english definition.
This is one example. "undefined behavior" doesn't mean "behavior that
is undefined"; it's a piece of technical jargon used by the C
standard, which roughly means "behavior that is not defined by the C
standard".


Right. I understood that...
The behavior of such code remains UB even if the implementation
chooses to provide it's own definition. UB includes, as one of it's
literal infinity of possibilities, behaving exactly as the
implementation has defined it to behave.


....but missed this bit when I glanced over the Standard before posting
that message. I somehow got the impression that if the implementation
provided additional str* functions (with external linkage), a program
running under that implementation could invoke them without causing UB.
Which doesn't make much sense, now that I think about it.

(Thanks also to Dan for posting a similar correction.)

--
Michael Wojcik mi************@ microfocus.com

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
-- David Bonde
Nov 14 '05 #31

Brian Inglis <Br**********@S ystematicSw.Inv alid> writes:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:12:51 GMT in comp.std.c, Sean Burke
<fo****@mystery .org> wrote:

Maurizio Loreti <ml*@foobar.i t> writes:
Da*****@cern.ch (Dan Pop) writes:

> In <x7************ @bolo.xenadyne. com> Sean Burke <fo****@mystery .org> writes:
>
> >Since you mention security (e.g. buffer overflows),
> >it's worth adding that strcpy, strcat have long since
> >been deprecated in favor of strlcpy, strlcat.
You mispelled n as noted below.
On the contrary, any C program using these identifiers with external
> linkage invokes undefined behaviour.

Maybe Mr. Burke misspelled "strncpy" and "strncat", mentioned in
ISO/IEC 9899:1999 under 7.21.2.4 and 7.21.3.2 ? Their prototypes (in
<string.h>) are

char *strncpy(char * restrict, const char * restrict, size_t);
char *strncat(char * restrict, const char * restrict, size_t);


No, I meant strlcpy/strlcat, and I find them to be better
than the strn* calls. I'm astonished to learn that they
aren't yet standardised.


You must be one of those Pascal types who like to access strings as
character arrays with indices, instead of pointers as K&R intended.
You wouldn't have liked BCPL, B, or NB either! ;^>

The BSD string functions strl{cat,cpy} are unlikely to be standardised
as they aren't supported by many libraries, and don't fit with any of
the current string handling functions, except strspn() and strcspn(),
which are also not heavily advertised or used, as their names are
confusing, nondescriptive, unobvious, and they too return counts
instead of pointers.

In any case, I prefer to check my string lengths before I do anything
with strcpy(); strncpy()'s handy for clearing previous junk from
buffers; never need strcat(), as I like to know where I am, and going
to be in a buffer. Avoids buffer overflows, heap and stack overwrites,
SIGSEGV, ACCVIO, and other unpleasantries, don't ya know.


I'm not sure why you've revived this long-dormant thread.
As far as factual matters go, I recall that the upshot of
the discussion was that:

1. strcpy/strcat have not been formally deprecated in the
C standard

2. strlcpy/strlcat have not been incorporated into the
C standard

As far as matters of preference go, if you find strncpy/ncat
adequate for your needs, that's great. I agree that strlen()
alone is sufficient to avoid overflows with strcpy/cat, as
long as you are careful.

I find that code using strlcpy/lcat is cleaner and less
susceptible to error, but YMMV.

Oh, and as for strspn, strcspn - I find these are very useful
functions, but it's another example of the power of idiom in
programming. It took me a long time to notice that I could
this, for example:

if (strspn(argv[i], "-0123456789") != strlen(argv[i]))
fprintf(stderr, "The argument \"%s\" must be a decimal integer.\n", argv[i]);

-SEan




Nov 14 '05 #32
Brian Inglis wrote:
.... snip ...
The BSD string functions strl{cat,cpy} are unlikely to be
standardised as they aren't supported by many libraries, and don't
fit with any of the current string handling functions, except
strspn() and strcspn(), which are also not heavily advertised or
used, as their names are confusing, nondescriptive, unobvious, and
they too return counts instead of pointers.


Which (return values) is precisely why they should be used in
preference to the already available standard routines. They
greatly reduce the prevalence of errors. They are also easily
implemented with purely standard C and no library dependencies, so
there is no reason to eschew them. For one implementation (put in
public domain) see:

<http://cbfalconer.home .att.net/download/strlcpy.zip>

For justifications for their use, etc, see:

<http://www.courtesan.c om/todd/papers/strlcpy.html>

If your system has these routines, congratulations . If not, feel
free to mount mine. In either case using them will reduce your
error rate.

--
Chuck F (cb********@yah oo.com) (cb********@wor ldnet.att.net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home .att.net> USE worldnet address!

Nov 14 '05 #33
Sean Burke <fo****@mystery .org> writes:
[...]
Oh, and as for strspn, strcspn - I find these are very useful
functions, but it's another example of the power of idiom in
programming. It took me a long time to notice that I could
this, for example:

if (strspn(argv[i], "-0123456789") != strlen(argv[i]))
fprintf(stderr,
"The argument \"%s\" must be a decimal integer.\n",
argv[i]);


[code reformatted to fit screen]

That's fine if you consider "3-2", "---", and "" to be decimal integers.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keit h) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
Schroedinger does Shakespeare: "To be *and* not to be"
Nov 14 '05 #34
# > if (strspn(argv[i], "-0123456789") != strlen(argv[i]))
# > fprintf(stderr,
# > "The argument \"%s\" must be a decimal integer.\n",
# > argv[i]);
#
# [code reformatted to fit screen]
#
# That's fine if you consider "3-2", "---", and "" to be decimal integers.

if (strtol(p,&q,0) , p==q) not an integer
else if (*q) integer followed by something else
else an integer

--
Derk Gwen http://derkgwen.250fre e.com/html/index.html
We found a loophole; they can't keep us out anymore.
Nov 14 '05 #35

Derk Gwen <de******@HotPO P.com> writes:
# > if (strspn(argv[i], "-0123456789") != strlen(argv[i]))
# > fprintf(stderr,
# > "The argument \"%s\" must be a decimal integer.\n",
# > argv[i]);
#
# [code reformatted to fit screen]
#
# That's fine if you consider "3-2", "---", and "" to be decimal integers.

if (strtol(p,&q,0) , p==q) not an integer
else if (*q) integer followed by something else
else an integer


Anyone who knows how to use strtol doesn't need advice from me. :-)
But how many people just pass the argument to atoi() and let any
problems manifest themselves further along?

I think the method I illustrated has the virtue of being a
"pretty good" filter, while also being much more widely
applicable than strtol().

Suppose I want to accept an IP address, but I want to ensure
that it's not a domain name:

if (strspn(argv[i], ".012345678 9") != strlen(argv[i]))
fprintf(stderr, "Arg \"%s\" must be an numeric IP address.\n", argv[i]);

Sure, "...0" would pass this filter, but the chief goal is
to reject "foo.bar.co m". Yes, I could use inet_addr() instead,
but what does inet_addr() do with "9.37.190.192.i n-addr.arpa"?

Certainly, regcomp/regexec provide a filtering method that can
be both precise and very general. But strspn/cspn() provide a
useful balance of precision and convenience.

-SEan


Nov 14 '05 #36

Derk Gwen <de******@HotPO P.com> writes:
# > if (strspn(argv[i], "-0123456789") != strlen(argv[i]))
# > fprintf(stderr,
# > "The argument \"%s\" must be a decimal integer.\n",
# > argv[i]);
#
# [code reformatted to fit screen]
#
# That's fine if you consider "3-2", "---", and "" to be decimal integers.

if (strtol(p,&q,0) , p==q) not an integer
else if (*q) integer followed by something else
else an integer


Anyone who knows how to use strtol doesn't need advice from me. :-)
But how many people just pass the argument to atoi() and let any
problems manifest themselves further along?

I think the method I illustrated has the virtue of being a
"pretty good" filter, while also being much more widely
applicable than strtol().

Suppose I want to accept an IP address, but I want to ensure
that it's not a domain name:

if (strspn(argv[i], ".012345678 9") != strlen(argv[i]))
fprintf(stderr, "Arg \"%s\" must be an numeric IP address.\n", argv[i]);

Sure, "...0" would pass this filter, but the chief goal is
to reject "foo.bar.co m". Yes, I could use inet_addr() instead,
but what does inet_addr() do with "9.37.190.192.i n-addr.arpa"?

Certainly, regcomp/regexec provide a filtering method that can
be both precise and very general. But strspn/cspn() provide a
useful balance of precision and convenience.

-SEan


Nov 14 '05 #37
>>> Sean Burke wrote:

SB> Sure, "...0" would pass this filter, but the chief goal is
SB> to reject "foo.bar.co m". Yes, I could use inet_addr() instead,
SB> but what does inet_addr() do with "9.37.190.192.i n-addr.arpa"?

$ host 127.0.0.1
1.0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA domain name pointer localhost
$ ping 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa
ping: cannot resolve 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa: No address associated with name

Feel the difference between asking A and PTR ;)
-netch-
Nov 14 '05 #38

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

5
3647
by: Jonas Galvez | last post by:
Is it true that joining the string elements of a list is faster than concatenating them via the '+' operator? "".join() vs 'a'+'b'+'c' If so, can anyone explain why?
20
11327
by: hagai26 | last post by:
I am looking for the best and efficient way to replace the first word in a str, like this: "aa to become" -> "/aa/ to become" I know I can use spilt and than join them but I can also use regular expressions and I sure there is a lot ways, but I need realy efficient one
3
11160
by: John Ford | last post by:
For simple string concatenation, is there a difference between... Dim s As String s += "add this to string" ....and... Dim s As String s = String.Concat(s, "add this to string")
9
2051
by: Justin M. Keyes | last post by:
Hi, Please read carefully before assuming that this is the same old question about string concatenation in C#! It is well-known that the following concatenation produces multiple immutable String objects for each statement: String a = "a"; a += "b";
16
2156
by: Mark A. Sam | last post by:
Hello, I am having a problem with imputting into a string variable: Dim strSQL As String = "INSERT INTO tblContactForm1 (txtName, txtCompany, txtPhone, txtEmail, txtComment, chkGrower, chkProduceDealer, txtOtherCustType, chkStandardBags, chkCustomBags,txtOtherBags) " + _ "VALUES ('" + txtName.Text + "','" + txtCompany.Text + "','" + txtPhone.Text + "','" + txtEmail.Text + "','" + txtComment.Text + "','" +
33
4691
by: genc_ymeri | last post by:
Hi over there, Propably this subject is discussed over and over several times. I did google it too but I was a little bit surprised what I read on internet when it comes 'when to use what'. Most of articles I read from different experts and programmers tell me that their "gut feelings" for using stringBuilder instead of string concatenation is when the number of string concatunation is more then N ( N varies between 3 to max 15 from...
12
2716
by: Richard Lewis Haggard | last post by:
I thought that the whole point of StringBuilder was that it was supposed to be a faster way of building strings than string. However, I just put together a simple little application to do a comparative analysis between the two and, surprisingly, string seems to out perform StringBuilder by a significant amount. A string concatenation takes not quite twice as long using StringBuilder than it does with a string. This doesn't sound right to...
34
2664
by: Larry Hastings | last post by:
This is such a long posting that I've broken it out into sections. Note that while developing this patch I discovered a Subtle Bug in CPython, which I have discussed in its own section below. ____________ THE OVERVIEW I don't remember where I picked it up, but I remember reading years ago that the simple, obvious Python approach for string concatenation: x = "a" + "b"
10
13642
by: =?Utf-8?B?RWxlbmE=?= | last post by:
I am surprised to discover that c# automatically converts an integer to a string when concatenating with the "+" operator. I thought c# was supposed to be very strict about types. Doesn't it seem like c# is breaking its own rules? This works: int b = 32; string a = "ABC " + b; Result: a = "ABC 32"
34
3558
by: raylopez99 | last post by:
StringBuilder better and faster than string for adding many strings. Look at the below. It's amazing how much faster StringBuilder is than string. The last loop below is telling: for adding 200000 strings of 8 char each, string took over 25 minutes while StringBuilder took 40 milliseconds! Can anybody explain such a radical difference?
0
9643
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
0
9480
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
0
8968
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
1
7494
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules. He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms. Adolph will...
0
6735
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
0
5378
by: TSSRALBI | last post by:
Hello I'm a network technician in training and I need your help. I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs. The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols. I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
0
5511
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
1
4044
by: 6302768590 | last post by:
Hai team i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
2
3643
muto222
by: muto222 | last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.