Union, ternary operator, Macro, printf don't cooperate for me. Help?

[Paul E Johnson]

Dear friends in C:

I'm completely baffled by this problem I have with
printf statements and conditional operators in C.
I'm using gcc-3.3.

I have a project where the rarely used Union type
is called for! Incredible, but true.

union mixed
{
long unsigned int i;
double f;
} newMem;
It is no trouble to retrieve the values with newMem.i or newMem.f.
However, I want to make the choice between the two automatic by writing a
macro like this, which keys on the value of a variable "Stochastic ":

#define UMACRO(var) ((Stochastic) ? var.i : var.f )

So if Stochastic ==1 then I want to get back newMem.i,
otherwise I want newMem.f.

I get this psychotic behavior. WHen the macro UMACRO is in a
printf statement, things go completely berserk!

Here's a code snip:

printf("newMem = %lu \n", newMem.i);
printf("Stochas tic=%d, UMACRO = %lu Stochastic = %d \n",Stochasti c,
UMACRO(newMem), Stochastic);
{
long unsigned int testval = UMACRO(newMem);
printf("testval %lu\n", testval);
}
And here's the output it produces when Stochastic==1 and
newMem.i = 97:

newMem = 97
Stochastic=1, UMACRO = 0 Stochastic = 1079525376
testval 97

When you look at the ouptut in line 2, you figure UMACRO
does not work at all, and it does something horrible affect
the printout of the second Stochastic in that line. However,
note the 3rd line, which is produced by first retrieving the value from
the union and then printing it out. That is correct.
I was thinking that the problem is the pre-processor, but
here is the output from gcc -E, which appears as expected.

printf("newMem = %lu \n", newMem.i);
printf("Stochas tic=%d, UMACRO = %lu Stochastic = %d \n",Stochasti c,
((Stochastic)?n ewMem.i:newMem. f ), Stochastic);
{long unsigned int testval = ((Stochastic)?n ewMem.i:newMem. f );
printf("testval %lu\n", testval);}

So maybe the ternary conditional is not working in the
right hand side of the printf? Is that a known thing? And
why does it make the output of the second Stochastic in line 2 turn into
crapola 1079525376.

???

--
Paul E. Johnson email: pa******@ukans. edu
Dept. of Political Science http://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~pauljohn

[Ed Morton]

Paul E Johnson wrote:

Dear friends in C:

<snip>
We heard you the first time 8-).

[Christian Bau]

In article <pa************ *************** *@ku.edu>,
Paul E Johnson <pa******@ku.ed u> wrote:

#define UMACRO(var) ((Stochastic) ? var.i : var.f )

So if Stochastic ==1 then I want to get back newMem.i,
otherwise I want newMem.f.

I get this psychotic behavior. WHen the macro UMACRO is in a
printf statement, things go completely berserk!
What is the type of ((Stochastic) ? var.i : var.f) ?

The type of var.i is int.
The type of var.f is double.

Whatever value is picked depending on the value of Stochastic, will then
be converted according to the "usual arithmetic conversion"s to type
double, and that is the type of result.
Here's a code snip:

printf("newMem = %lu \n", newMem.i);
printf("Stochas tic=%d, UMACRO = %lu Stochastic = %d \n",Stochasti c,
UMACRO(newMem), Stochastic);
%lu is the wrong format to print a double value. You get undefined
behavior, which causes the rather interesting output. Use a double
format instead.
{
long unsigned int testval = UMACRO(newMem);
printf("testval %lu\n", testval);
Here you convert the double value to unsigned long, so you use %lu
to print an unsigned long value. Everything is fine here. If var.f had a
fractional part and Stochastic is zero then the fractional part would be
lost.
}