array of size 0

[Emmanuel Delahaye]

Hi,

I know that C90 and C9x (N869) doesn't allow to define an array of size 0.

int x[0]; /* constraint violation */

I was under the impression that this was possible in C99, due to the common
C90 practice:

struct a
{
int x;
char y[1];
};

that allows to build a linear structure with an array bigger than one,

struct a
{
int x;
char y[0];
};

char x[123];
struct a *p = (struct a*) x;

or is it just an extension of gcc?

Thanks to clarify my close-to-melt brain.
(we have 40°C in Paris, hopefully, I go to Ireland for holydays next Sunday)

--
-ed- em**********@no os.fr [remove YOURBRA before answering me]
The C-language FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
<blank line>
FAQ de f.c.l.c : http://www.isty-info.uvsq.fr/~rumeau/fclc/

[Kevin Easton]

Emmanuel Delahaye <em**********@n oos.fr> wrote:

Hi,

I know that C90 and C9x (N869) doesn't allow to define an array of size 0.

int x[0]; /* constraint violation */

I was under the impression that this was possible in C99, due to the common
C90 practice:

struct a
{
int x;
char y[1];
};

that allows to build a linear structure with an array bigger than one,

struct a
{
int x;
char y[0];
};
No, the C99 flexible array member looks like:

struct a
{
int x;
char y[];
};
char x[123];
struct a *p = (struct a*) x;
You can't do that, x isn't necessarily correctly aligned for access as
"struct a".

struct a *p = malloc(123);
Thanks to clarify my close-to-melt brain.
(we have 40?C in Paris, hopefully, I go to Ireland for holydays next Sunday)

Bah, we get 40C here every summer :)

- Kevin.

[Emmanuel Delahaye]

In 'comp.lang.c', Kevin Easton <[e-mail]> wrote:

(we have 40?C in Paris, hopefully, I go to Ireland for holydays next
Sunday)

Bah, we get 40C here every summer :)

With air conditionning, I guess. No such a thing here! Trust me, it's hell!

--
-ed- em**********@no os.fr [remove YOURBRA before answering me]
The C-language FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
<blank line>
FAQ de f.c.l.c : http://www.isty-info.uvsq.fr/~rumeau/fclc/

[Mark A. Odell]

Emmanuel Delahaye <em**********@n oos.fr> wrote in
news:Xn******** *************** ****@130.133.1. 4:

(we have 40?C in Paris, hopefully, I go to Ireland for holydays next
Sunday)

Bah, we get 40C here every summer :)

With air conditionning, I guess. No such a thing here! Trust me, it's
hell!

Good grief, how can you not have A/C? Do you have running water? :-) BTW,
what's the dew point? That's what really makes you uncomfortable.

--
- Mark ->
--

[Dan Pop]

In <Xn************ *************** @130.133.1.4> Emmanuel Delahaye <em**********@n oos.fr> writes:

struct a
{
int x;
char y[0];
};

char x[123];
struct a *p = (struct a*) x;
Remember what we keep telling the beginners? Casts are evil in C!
If you don't know what you're doing when casting a pointer, don't do it!
Yeah, all this applies to you, too! If the x array is not properly
aligned for a struct a access, the behaviour of the cast is undefined!
or is it just an extension of gcc?

Why not ask gcc itself?

fangorn:~/tmp 2321> cat test.c
struct a
{
int x;
char y[0];
};
fangorn:~/tmp 2322> gcc -c -std=c99 -pedantic test.c
test.c:4: warning: ISO C forbids zero-size array `y'

To make the struct definition correct for C99, drop the 0 (declare y as a
sizeless array). This is a "flexible array member" in the C99 lingo.

Dan
--
Dan Pop
DESY Zeuthen, RZ group
Email: Da*****@ifh.de

[Dan Pop]

In <Xn************ *************** *******@130.133 .1.4> "Mark A. Odell" <no****@embedde dfw.com> writes:

Emmanuel Delahaye <em**********@n oos.fr> wrote in
news:Xn******* *************** *****@130.133.1 .4:

(we have 40?C in Paris, hopefully, I go to Ireland for holydays next
Sunday)

Bah, we get 40C here every summer :)

With air conditionning, I guess. No such a thing here! Trust me, it's
hell!

Good grief, how can you not have A/C?

Only the servers and the tape robot in the machine room are considered
worthy of it ;-(

Dan
--
Dan Pop
DESY Zeuthen, RZ group
Email: Da*****@ifh.de