std::cout and NULL character pointer

[nish.parikh]

Hi,

I am using std::cout to print a char pointer that is NULL. Subsequent
calls to std::cout dont print anything. Is this the expected behavior?

example:
#include <iostream>
int main( int argc, char *argv[] ) {
char *q = 0;
std::cout << q << "\n";
std::cout << "Program ended\n";
}

Program ended does not get printed when i run this program.

I am working on solaris platform with gcc 3.2.2.

Let me know if this is not the correct group for such questions.
Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Nish.

[Ron Natalie]

ni*********@gma il.com wrote:

Hi,

I am using std::cout to print a char pointer that is NULL. Subsequent
calls to std::cout dont print anything. Is this the expected behavior?

example:
#include <iostream>
int main( int argc, char *argv[] ) {
char *q = 0;
std::cout << q << "\n";
std::cout << "Program ended\n";
}

Program ended does not get printed when i run this program.

It's undefined behavior to pass a null pointer here.

[DeltaOne]

Hi Nish,
As Ron told this is a undefined behaviour. The reason is as follows.
When you give a nummvalue to a pointer that is by assigning it 0 or
NULL then it means to the compiler that this pointer do not point to
the location where data (valid data) is there. In compilers they may
map this thing to a range of memory area. This memory area range is in
order used by the CPU to throw a software interrupt when ever some
thing is reffered to any of these areas. This range is used for this
purpose only.

This is as far as i remember the initial some KB of memory. But its
processor dependent. So never try this or you will get run time
undefined behaviour.If you find something more you can share with me.

~Regards
DeltaOne

[Jaspreet]

ni*********@gma il.com wrote:

Hi,

I am using std::cout to print a char pointer that is NULL. Subsequent
calls to std::cout dont print anything. Is this the expected behavior?

example:
#include <iostream>
int main( int argc, char *argv[] ) {
char *q = 0;
std::cout << q << "\n"; Why do you need to do this ? Any specific reason ? Seems to me to be a
case of undefined behaviour which should be avoided. std::cout << "Program ended\n";
}

Program ended does not get printed when i run this program.

I am working on solaris platform with gcc 3.2.2. Same behaviour on gcc3.2.2 on linux also.
Let me know if this is not the correct group for such questions.
Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Nish.

[Rapscallion]

ni*********@gma il.com wrote:

I am using std::cout to print a char pointer that is NULL. Subsequent
calls to std::cout dont print anything. Is this the expected behavior?

example:
#include <iostream>
int main( int argc, char *argv[] ) {
char *q = 0;
std::cout << q << "\n";
std::cout << "Program ended\n";
}

You need to define a special operator<<. This should work:

std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream& os, const char* p) {
if (p) {
os.write (p, strlen (p) +1);
} else {
os.write ("NULL", sizeof("NULL")) ;
}
return os;
}

[nish.parikh]

Thanks everyone for responding. I think the behavior should not be
undefined. As per ansidraft I found at
http://members.fortunecity.com/dumbf...rmatted.reqmts
and also comments in the STL code, seems like the bad bit for cout
stream would be set, when we try to do a cout << (char*)0; as a result
of which no subsequent calls to cout will print anything until the bad
state is cleared.

Nish.
Rapscallion wrote:

ni*********@gma il.com wrote:

I am using std::cout to print a char pointer that is NULL. Subsequent
calls to std::cout dont print anything. Is this the expected behavior?

example:
#include <iostream>
int main( int argc, char *argv[] ) {
char *q = 0;
std::cout << q << "\n";
std::cout << "Program ended\n";
}

You need to define a special operator<<. This should work:

std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream& os, const char* p) {
if (p) {
os.write (p, strlen (p) +1);
} else {
os.write ("NULL", sizeof("NULL")) ;
}
return os;
}

[Ron Natalie]

ni*********@gma il.com wrote:

Thanks everyone for responding. I think the behavior should not be
undefined. As per ansidraft I found at
http://members.fortunecity.com/dumbf...rmatted.reqmts
and also comments in the STL code, seems like the bad bit for cout
stream would be set, when we try to do a cout << (char*)0; as a result
of which no subsequent calls to cout will print anything until the bad
state is cleared.

I can't comment on that draft (I refuse to reference a site with that
name), but I can tell you that passing a NULL to Standard constructs
expecting a null-terminated string is almost universally undefined
behavior. There is no guarantee of squat. It might set the bad
bit, it might just output nothing, it might cause monkeys to erupt
from the user's posterior.