debug gives different result than run

[marcus]

I have this class A that contains a method A_method that opens a file
and does fgets.

I also have a template class B that contains a method B_method that
takes a class A object as template type. B_method then uses this A
object to call A_method.

here is a snippet (pseudo)

In class A.cpp:
===============
B <A> myVar;

// method that uses method of template class
A::someMethod() {
myVar.B_method( this);

[Larry Brasfield]

"marcus" <ma************ @koping.net> wrote in message
news:1a******** *************** **@posting.goog le.com...

I have this class A that contains a method A_method that opens a file
and does fgets.

I also have a template class B that contains a method B_method that
takes a class A object as template type. B_method then uses this A
object to call A_method.

here is a snippet (pseudo)

In class A.cpp:
===============
B <A> myVar;

// method that uses method of template class
A::someMethod() {
myVar.B_method( this);
.
.
}

// method to be called from template class
A::A_method(cha r *fileName){
char iLine[200];
int meshCount = 0;

FILE *stream = fopen(fileName, "r");
//geometryData = NULL;
if(stream != NULL){
// loop through parsing every line in the file
while (fgets(iLine, 200, stream) != NULL){
.
.
}
}
}

In class B.h:
=============
B<TAG>::B_metho d(TAG *A_object)
{
.
.
A_object->A_method(fileN ame)
}

The 1st method that is invoked above is A::someMethod
The problem is that when running the application the fgets makes the
application crash (the _cnt component has the value -1). When
debugging the application though everything works fine.

Your shown code has become a bit too pseudo.
There is no _cnt component and from what is
shown, there is no visible reason for the fgets()
call to fail with a fault.

It is common, when one has induced undefined
behavior, for that behavior to change when the
build settings change.

You may want to provide some real but reduced
code that duplicates your problem. Alternatively,
learn to modify your non-debug build so that you
can use the debugger and debug it.

--
--Larry Brasfield
email: do************* **********@hotm ail.com
Above views may belong only to me.

[Chris Theis]

"marcus" <ma************ @koping.net> wrote in message
news:1a******** *************** **@posting.goog le.com...

I have this class A that contains a method A_method that opens a file
and does fgets.

I also have a template class B that contains a method B_method that
takes a class A object as template type. B_method then uses this A
object to call A_method.

here is a snippet (pseudo)

In class A.cpp:
===============
B <A> myVar;

// method that uses method of template class
A::someMethod() {
myVar.B_method( this);
.
.
}

// method to be called from template class
A::A_method(cha r *fileName){
char iLine[200];
int meshCount = 0;

FILE *stream = fopen(fileName, "r");
//geometryData = NULL;
if(stream != NULL){
// loop through parsing every line in the file
while (fgets(iLine, 200, stream) != NULL){
.
.
}
}
}

In class B.h:
=============
B<TAG>::B_metho d(TAG *A_object)
{
.
.
A_object->A_method(fileN ame)
}

The 1st method that is invoked above is A::someMethod
The problem is that when running the application the fgets makes the
application crash (the _cnt component has the value -1). When
debugging the application though everything works fine.

Code that exhibits such behavior is very likely to cause some undefined
behavior in previous sections before your program breaks down. Most probably
the problem is not fgets() but might be found before. Use your debugger to
break before fgets is executed and check the variables & pointers that are
around.

HTH
Chris

[marcus]

Thanks for answering.

"Larry Brasfield" <do************ ***********@hot mail.com> wrote in message

Your shown code has become a bit too pseudo. Yes maybe I am sorry for this, I will shortly try to post some code
that is more of the actual code I am using.
There is no _cnt component the _cnt component is an element of the FILE datatype. I think it is
supposed to have the value of the number of bytes read (this showing
-1 when I run is not a good sign :-( ).
You may want to provide some real but reduced
code that duplicates your problem.

I will try to do that shortly

[marcus]

Problem solved!

You were right, I had a pointer that was used before the call to
A_method that did not seem to be pointing correctly.

Thanx to both of you for your attention.

"Chris Theis" <Ch*********@ no-spam.cern.ch> wrote in message news:<d1******* ***@sunnews.cer n.ch>...

"marcus" <ma************ @koping.net> wrote in message
news:1a******** *************** **@posting.goog le.com...

I have this class A that contains a method A_method that opens a file
and does fgets.

I also have a template class B that contains a method B_method that
takes a class A object as template type. B_method then uses this A
object to call A_method.

here is a snippet (pseudo)

In class A.cpp:
===============
B <A> myVar;

// method that uses method of template class
A::someMethod() {
myVar.B_method( this);
.
.
}

// method to be called from template class
A::A_method(cha r *fileName){
char iLine[200];
int meshCount = 0;

FILE *stream = fopen(fileName, "r");
//geometryData = NULL;
if(stream != NULL){
// loop through parsing every line in the file
while (fgets(iLine, 200, stream) != NULL){
.
.
}
}
}

In class B.h:
=============
B<TAG>::B_metho d(TAG *A_object)
{
.
.
A_object->A_method(fileN ame)
}

The 1st method that is invoked above is A::someMethod
The problem is that when running the application the fgets makes the
application crash (the _cnt component has the value -1). When
debugging the application though everything works fine.

Code that exhibits such behavior is very likely to cause some undefined
behavior in previous sections before your program breaks down. Most probably
the problem is not fgets() but might be found before. Use your debugger to
break before fgets is executed and check the variables & pointers that are
around.

HTH
Chris