Hello, I have been trying to write a functor template for a week now
and I'm just having tons of trouble because I don't understand an issue
that I guess is pretty basic to this task.
functor<bool (long, long)> myFunctor;
myFunctor = AFunctionOfThat Prototype;
To get that much is elementary because the template can just store a
(bool)(long,lon g) as a member variable in functor<T>. Here is the
problem:
bool whether = myFunctor(1,2);
How can I possibly ever utilize the individual result and parameter
type from the prototype in functor::operat or()? I have been poring over
several template libraries and I just can't see how they accomplish it
with partial specialization. After all, I can't debug the compiler
itself or look at preprocessor source to figure out what's happening.
I understand that I could always settle for this syntax fairly easily:
functor<bool, long, long> myFunctor;
bool whether = myFunctor(4,5);
And then use a typedef inside the template to make the prototype. But
the libraries I've seen don't have to settle for that. How is this
trick done??? If it matters, I'm using XCode. Thank you very much in
advance,
Yours,
Dan 8 1978
<da************ *@gmail.com> wrote... Hello, I have been trying to write a functor template for a week now and I'm just having tons of trouble because I don't understand an issue that I guess is pretty basic to this task.
functor<bool (long, long)> myFunctor;
Perhaps you wanted
functor<bool(*) (long,long)> myFunctor;
myFunctor = AFunctionOfThat Prototype;
To get that much is elementary because the template can just store a (bool)(long,lon g) as a member variable in functor<T>. Here is the problem:
bool whether = myFunctor(1,2);
How can I possibly ever utilize the individual result and parameter type from the prototype in functor::operat or()?
I am not sure what you mean here, but you need to implement that operator
to "utilize the individual result".
I have been poring over several template libraries and I just can't see how they accomplish it with partial specialization. After all, I can't debug the compiler itself or look at preprocessor source to figure out what's happening.
I understand that I could always settle for this syntax fairly easily:
functor<bool, long, long> myFunctor; bool whether = myFunctor(4,5);
And then use a typedef inside the template to make the prototype. But the libraries I've seen don't have to settle for that. How is this trick done??? If it matters, I'm using XCode. Thank you very much in advance,
Well, if I understood your requirements and your comprehension of the
problem, you should be able to fill in the blanks here:
template<class F> class functor
{
F f; // that's something to what your functor
// delegates the functionlity
public:
functor& operator = (F ff) { ??? }
bool operator ()(long l1, long l2) { ??? }
};
The blanks I was talking about are indicated by ???
Of course, a parameterized constructor might be useful as well, so you
could write
functor<bool (*)(long,long)> myFunctor = AFunctionOfThat Prototype;
instead of using two statements.
Good luck!
V
wrote in news:11******** *************@o 13g2000cwo.goog legroups.com in
comp.lang.c++: I understand that I could always settle for this syntax fairly easily:
functor<bool, long, long> myFunctor; bool whether = myFunctor(4,5);
#include <iostream>
#include <ostream>
int function( int a, int b )
{
std::cout << "function( " << a << ", " << b << " );\n";
return 0;
}
/* declaration, no defenition
*/
template < typename F > struct functor;
/* Example, just the one specialization
*/
template < typename R, typename A1, typename A2 >
struct functor< R( A1, A2 ) >
{
functor( R arg(A1, A2) ) : f( arg ) {}
R operator () ( A1 a1, A2 a2 )
{
return f( a1, a2 );
}
private:
R (*f) ( A1, A2 );
};
int main()
{
functor< int( int, int ) > f( function );
return f( 1, 2 );
}
You will need to provide a specialization for each arity (number
of arguments) you want to support, also you might want to use
somthing to add `const &` to the paramiter types of the operator.
Untested code:
....
R operator () (
typename add_cref< A1 >::type a1,
typename add_cref< A2 >::type a2
)
{
return f( a1, a2 )
}
....
template < typename T > struct add_cref
{
typedef T const &type;
};
template < typename T > struct add_cref< T const & >
{
typedef T const &type;
};
template < typename T > struct add_cref< T & >
{
typedef T &type;
};
HTH.
Rob.
 http://www.victimprime.dsl.pipex.com/
Thank you Victor and Rob. Peace.
Dan
Hmm. Couple of interesting things...
1. There seems to be no problem using const& like anything else, so I
haven't implemented add_cref.
2. When the prototype has no parameters I have to phrase it different
ways in different compilers.
template < typename R > class functor< R() > // this is fine in xcode,
breaks metrowerks
template < typename R > class functor< R(*)() > // vice versa
Weird...I'll keep exploring.
Dan
wrote in news:11******** *************@z 14g2000cwz.goog legroups.com in
comp.lang.c++: Hmm. Couple of interesting things...
1. There seems to be no problem using const& like anything else, so I haven't implemented add_cref.
Quite right too, never solve problems you don't have :). 2. When the prototype has no parameters I have to phrase it different ways in different compilers.
template < typename R > class functor< R() > // this is fine in xcode, breaks metrowerks
It should work, try: < R( void ) >.
Also its a good idea to give compiler version and platform as well
as vendor, somebody with the same or a similar configuration might
be able to provide a work around. Unfortunatly I don't have a
Metroworks compiler so I can't look for one myself.
template < typename R > class functor< R(*)() > // vice versa
Weird...I'll keep exploring.
Not really R(*)() is functionpointer, R() is function type
and this is one of the situations where a function type doesn't
decay to a functionpointer type, IOW it really shouldn't work.
Rob.
 http://www.victimprime.dsl.pipex.com/
Well, since it isn't supposed to work I found a different way: if the
function returns a Homer, you just declare functor<Homer>, which is
reasonable to me as long as I can still declare functor<Homer (J,
Simpson)>. Following source is how I do it for 0 params. The emptiness
param is so it doesn't confuse the partial specialization with the
original definition.
(BTW Rob, putting void in the defintion seems to make no difference on
XCode 1.5 or MWCW 8. What compiler are you using?)
struct emptiness {};
template < typename F , typename E=emptiness > class functor;
// zero params alt syntax
template < typename R > class functor< R, emptiness>
{
typedef R(*pt)();
pt _pt;
public:
functor( ) : _pt( 0 ) {}
functor( pt arg ) : _pt( arg ) {}
R operator () ( ) const { return _pt( ); }
functor& operator = (pt arg) { _pt = arg; return *this; }
};
wrote in news:11******** **************@ l41g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com in
comp.lang.c++: Well, since it isn't supposed to work I found a different way: if the function returns a Homer, you just declare functor<Homer>, which is reasonable to me as long as I can still declare functor<Homer (J, Simpson)>. Following source is how I do it for 0 params. The emptiness param is so it doesn't confuse the partial specialization with the original definition.
(BTW Rob, putting void in the defintion seems to make no difference on XCode 1.5 or MWCW 8. What compiler are you using?)
struct emptiness {}; template < typename F , typename E=emptiness > class functor; // zero params alt syntax template < typename R > class functor< R, emptiness> { typedef R(*pt)(); pt _pt;
public: functor( ) : _pt( 0 ) {} functor( pt arg ) : _pt( arg ) {} R operator () ( ) const { return _pt( ); } functor& operator = (pt arg) { _pt = arg; return *this; } };
Looks good, but I'm not sure I see the need for the emptyness
paramiter why not just have the unspecialized version handle
0 paramiter case:
template < typename R > class functor
{
typedef R(*pt)();
pt _pt;
public:
functor( ) : _pt( 0 ) {}
functor( pt arg ) : _pt( arg ) {}
R operator () ( ) const { return _pt( ); }
functor& operator = (pt arg) { _pt = arg; return *this; }
};
Rob.
 http://www.victimprime.dsl.pipex.com/
Hmm...never even thought of that! This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics 
by: CoolPint 
last post by:
Can anyone explain how I can make the following function accept an
default arguement for the last parameter, which should be an optional
functor?
template <typename T, typename FUNCTOR>
void bsort(T * si, T * ei, FUNCTOR cmpfunc)
{
int k = 0;
for (T * i = si; i < ei  1; i++, k++)
for (T * j = si; j < (eik1) ; j++)

by: CoolPint 
last post by:
I am trying to write a generic heapsort (of course as a selfexercise)
with Iterator interface: something like blow....
But I got into trouble finding out the Iterator to the Child node. If
indexing was used, I could do something like child = hole * 2 + 1; but
since only thing the function accepts are random access Iterators, how
do I calculate the Iterator to the child node?
template <typename Iterator, typename Functor>
void...

by: CoolPint 
last post by:
I have implemented a generic priority queue below and tested it works
fine, but I have one small problem I cannot understand. I have type
parameter F which determines the priority so that users can
instantiate in the following ways
PQueue<int> pq1;
PQueue<int, Functor> pq2; // where Functor is a name of userdefined
class
I also added another constructor to accept a function pointer so that

by: daniel.w.gelder 
last post by:
I wrote a template class that takes a function prototype and lets you
store and call a Clevel function, like this:
inline string SampleFunction(int, bool) {..}
functor<string (int, bool)> myFunctor = SampleFunction;
string result = myFunctor(7, true);
Works great thanks to the help from this group. Here's the guts so far
for twoarity:

by: aaragon 
last post by:
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to provide some external functionality to a class through a
functor object defined by the user. The concept is as follows:
template <class Functor>
class ClassA
{
...
double evaluate(){
 
by: Daniel T. 
last post by:
typedef unsigned short u16; // may be different on your machine
typedef unsigned char u8; // may be different on your machine
// assume dst is zero initialized upon entry
void packBits( u8* dst, const u16* src )
{
dst = src >1;
dst = src << 7;
dst = src >2;
dst = src << 6;

by: Lionel B 
last post by:
I have a function which takes a functor argument. I which to call it for a
functor which is actually a class member; this works fine, using
the mem_fun_ref and bind1st functions (see listing 1 below). Or, rather,
it works fine as long as my member functor is const. The problem comes
when I wish to use it for a *non*const functor (see listing 2 below):
*** Start listing 1 ***************************************************
// test1.cpp

by: alan 
last post by:
Hello all, I'd like to know if there is a nice method of defining a
functor creator which accepts an Nary function and returns a functor
based on that function.
For example I have a function:
template<class X, class Y, class Z>
X function(Y, Z);
Passing it to the functor creator will give a functor equivalent to:
template<class X, class Y, class Z>

by: aaragon 
last post by:
Hi guys,
Is there a way to return a functor from a recursive call that takes
different paths? Let's say that I have a tree structure like:
root

first child  nextSibling nextSibling nextSibling
>0
 

by: Hystou 
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...

by: jinu1996 
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
 
by: tracyyun 
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, ZWave, WiFi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...

by: agi2029 
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and nocode agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...

by: conductexam 
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...

by: TSSRALBI 
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LANtoLAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LANtoLAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...

by: adsilva 
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?

by: 6302768590 
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
 
by: muto222 
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
 