Static member functions in Abstract Base Class

[yan]

Hi, everybody. I'm new to this great forum, so hello!
I start with a problem of my project.
I have an Abstract Base Class used as base class for differentes
Derived classes. The derived classes must able to set the behavior
af a function f() at run-time. I want use the same function behavior
also in Another Class, but without using inheritance because
Another Class not extend Base Class.

I have used a function pointer and static members function declared
in Base Class for differentes implementation of the function f().

Is correct? or is convenient to define a new class to share common
functionalities between Derived and Another class?
Here is the example code.

class AbstractBaseClass {
public:
virtual int f(int a, int b) = 0;
virtual void setImplementation(int implType) = 0;
static int fImplementationOne(int a, int b) {
return a+b;
}
static int fImplementationTwo(int a, int b) {
return a-b;
}
};
 
class DerivedClass : public AbstractBaseClass {
public:
DerivedClass(int implType) {
setImplementation(implType);
}
void setImplementation(int implType) {
if (implType == 0)
_f = &AbstractBaseClass::fImplementationOne;
else
_f = &AbstractBaseClass::fImplementationTwo;
}
int f(int a, int b) {
return _f(a, b);
}
private:
int (*_f)(int a, int b);
};
 
class AnotherClass {
public:
AnotherClass() {
_f = &AbstractBaseClass::fImplementationOne;
}
private:
int (*_f)(int a, int b);
};
 
int main()
{
AnotherClass a;
AbstractBaseClass *c = new DerivedClass(0);
cout << c->f(10,3) << '\n';
c->setImplementation(1);
cout << c->f(10,3) << '\n';
}
 
 

[Victor Bazarov]

"yan" <a_********@vir gilio.it> wrote...

I start with a problem of my project.
I have an Abstract Base Class used as base class for differentes
Derived classes. The derived classes must able to set the behavior
af a function f() at run-time. I want use the same function behavior
also in Another Class, but without using inheritance because
Another Class not extend Base Class.

I have used a function pointer and static members function declared
in Base Class for differentes implementation of the function f().

Is correct? or is convenient to define a new class to share common
functionalities between Derived and Another class?
Here is the example code.
[...]

If the code is working, I don't see a C++ problem. What you're
trying to comprehend is the problem of design, not implementation.
In order to see whether your design is OK and to recommend any
changes to it, we need to know what problem you're trying to solve
by developing such design.

Also, consider posting to comp.object for more OOD and OOA advice.

V