473,659 Members | 3,162 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Howto use callback functions with a C DLL

I have a C DLL that I want to use from a C# project. The C header file
contains these declarations:

typedef void (*callback_t) (const unsigned char *data, unsigned int
size, void *userdata);
void myfunction (callback_t callback, void *userdata);

How do I translate this to C#?

I tried with:

delegate void callback_t (Byte[] data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata);
[DllImport("mydl l.dll")]
static extern void myfunction (callback_t callback, IntPtr userdata);

When calling with myfunction (null, IntPtr.Zero) everything works as
expected. But once I start passing a callback function, the application
crashes with "Unhandled Exception: System.AccessVi olationExceptio n:
Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication
that other memory is corrupt."

void test (Byte[] data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata)
{
// Nothing here
}

callback_t callback = new callback_t (test);
myfunction (callback, IntPtr.Zero);

I tried changing the data parameter from a byte array to an IntPtr, but
that seems to make no difference. What am I doing wrong? All other
functions (without a callback function parameter) work perfect.
Jul 21 '08 #1
5 4308
Jef,

What is the C code doing with the callback data and how is it calling
the callback?
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard. caspershouse.co m

"Jef Driesen" <je********@hot mail.com.invali dwrote in message
news:g6******** **@ikaria.belne t.be...
>I have a C DLL that I want to use from a C# project. The C header file
contains these declarations:

typedef void (*callback_t) (const unsigned char *data, unsigned int size,
void *userdata);
void myfunction (callback_t callback, void *userdata);

How do I translate this to C#?

I tried with:

delegate void callback_t (Byte[] data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata);
[DllImport("mydl l.dll")]
static extern void myfunction (callback_t callback, IntPtr userdata);

When calling with myfunction (null, IntPtr.Zero) everything works as
expected. But once I start passing a callback function, the application
crashes with "Unhandled Exception: System.AccessVi olationExceptio n:
Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication
that other memory is corrupt."

void test (Byte[] data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata)
{
// Nothing here
}

callback_t callback = new callback_t (test);
myfunction (callback, IntPtr.Zero);

I tried changing the data parameter from a byte array to an IntPtr, but
that seems to make no difference. What am I doing wrong? All other
functions (without a callback function parameter) work perfect.

Jul 21 '08 #2
Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] wrote:
What is the C code doing with the callback data and how is it calling
the callback?
The C function is downloading data from an external device. This data is
stored internally in a C style array (stored on the stack or malloc'ed,
depending on the implementation) and processed to extract chunks of
data. Those chunks are passed to the caller by means of the callback
function.

typedef void (*callback_t) (const unsigned char *data, unsigned int
size, void *userdata);

void
myfunction (callback_t callback, void *userdata)
{
unsigned char buffer[SIZE];

// Read some data into the buffer here.

unsigned int offset = 0;
while (offset < sizeof (buffer)) {
unsigned int size = ...;

if (callback) callback (buffer + offset, size, userdata);

offset += size;
}
}

Inside the callback function, the application can process the downloaded
data, store it somewhere, etc. But it is not allowed to modify the data,
hence the usage of const. And of course the buffer remains only valid
during the lifetime of the callback function. If the app needs the data
longer, it needs to copy it.

Everything works great when the DLL is used in a C application, but not
in my C# application.
Jul 21 '08 #3
Jef Driesen wrote:
Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] wrote:
> What is the C code doing with the callback data and how is it calling
the callback?

The C function is downloading data from an external device. This data is
stored internally in a C style array (stored on the stack or malloc'ed,
depending on the implementation) and processed to extract chunks of
data. Those chunks are passed to the caller by means of the callback
function.

typedef void (*callback_t) (const unsigned char *data, unsigned int
size, void *userdata);

void
myfunction (callback_t callback, void *userdata)
{
unsigned char buffer[SIZE];

// Read some data into the buffer here.

unsigned int offset = 0;
while (offset < sizeof (buffer)) {
unsigned int size = ...;

if (callback) callback (buffer + offset, size, userdata);

offset += size;
}
}

Inside the callback function, the application can process the downloaded
data, store it somewhere, etc. But it is not allowed to modify the data,
hence the usage of const. And of course the buffer remains only valid
during the lifetime of the callback function. If the app needs the data
longer, it needs to copy it.

Everything works great when the DLL is used in a C application, but not
in my C# application.
I'm not really sure that the data parameter is the problem, because if I
remove that one, and reduce the DLL function to this simple example:

typedef void (*callback_t) (unsigned int size, void *userdata);

void
myfunction (callback_t callback, void *userdata)
{
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
printf ("iteration %u\n", i);

if (callback) callback (i, userdata);
}
}

And create a minimal console project with this code:

delegate void callback_t (UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata);

[DllImport("mydl l.dll")]
static extern void myfunction (callback_t callback, IntPtr userdata);

static void test_callback (UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata)
{
Console.WriteLi ne (size);
}

static void Main(string[] args)
{
callback_t mycallback = new callback_t (test_callback) ;
myfunction (mycallback, IntPtr.Zero);
}

It runs fine for the first few iterations, but than something goes
wrong. I get this output:

iteration 0
0
iteration 1
1
iteration 2
2
iteration 3
3
iteration 4
0
iteration 1
1697911994

Unhandled Exception: System.AccessVi olationExceptio n: Attempted to read
or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory
is corrupt.
at test.Class1.myf unction(callbac k_t callback, IntPtr userdata)
at test.Class1.Mai n(String[] args)
Jul 21 '08 #4
Jef Driesen wrote:
I have a C DLL that I want to use from a C# project. The C header file
contains these declarations:

typedef void (*callback_t) (const unsigned char *data, unsigned int
size, void *userdata);
void myfunction (callback_t callback, void *userdata);

How do I translate this to C#?

I tried with:

delegate void callback_t (Byte[] data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata);
[DllImport("mydl l.dll")]
static extern void myfunction (callback_t callback, IntPtr userdata);

When calling with myfunction (null, IntPtr.Zero) everything works as
expected. But once I start passing a callback function, the application
crashes with "Unhandled Exception: System.AccessVi olationExceptio n:
Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication
that other memory is corrupt."

void test (Byte[] data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata)
{
// Nothing here
}

callback_t callback = new callback_t (test);
myfunction (callback, IntPtr.Zero);

I tried changing the data parameter from a byte array to an IntPtr, but
that seems to make no difference. What am I doing wrong? All other
functions (without a callback function parameter) work perfect.
I think C# is somehow messing up the stack of my C DLL. If I export this
very simple function in my DLL (declared as extern "C" to avoid name
mangling):

typedef void (*callback_t) (const unsigned char *data, unsigned int
size, void *userdata);

void
myfunction (callback_t callback, void *userdata)
{
unsigned char data[] = {'a', 'b', 'c', 0x00};
printf ("pointer=%p\n" , data);
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 5; ++i) {
printf ("iteration %u\n", i);
if (callback)
callback (NULL, sizeof (data), userdata);
printf ("pointer=%p\n" , data);
}
}

And in C#, I use this code:

delegate void callback_t (IntPtr data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata);
[DllImport("mydl l.dll")]
static extern void myfunction (callback_t callback, IntPtr userdata);

static void test (IntPtr data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata)
{
// Nothing here
}

Now, if I call the DLL functon in my main function with the following
arguments:

myfunction1 (new callback_t (test), IntPtr.Zero);

I get this output:

pointer=0012F5F 0
iteration 0
pointer=0012F5F C
iteration 1
pointer=0012F60 8
iteration 2
pointer=0012F61 4
iteration 3
pointer=0012F62 0
iteration 4
pointer=0012F62 C

As you can see, the "data" pointer is increased by 12 bytes after each
invocation of the callback function, even if this pointer was never
passed to the callback function at all. If I pass "null" for the
callback function, the pointer remains the same. If I do the same
experiment in a C project, the pointer remains the same, just as it
should be. What am I doing wrong?
Jul 23 '08 #5
Jef Driesen wrote:
Jef Driesen wrote:
>I have a C DLL that I want to use from a C# project. The C header file
contains these declarations:

typedef void (*callback_t) (const unsigned char *data, unsigned int
size, void *userdata);
void myfunction (callback_t callback, void *userdata);

How do I translate this to C#?

I tried with:

delegate void callback_t (Byte[] data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata);
[DllImport("mydl l.dll")]
static extern void myfunction (callback_t callback, IntPtr userdata);

When calling with myfunction (null, IntPtr.Zero) everything works as
expected. But once I start passing a callback function, the application
crashes with "Unhandled Exception: System.AccessVi olationExceptio n:
Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication
that other memory is corrupt."

void test (Byte[] data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata)
{
// Nothing here
}

callback_t callback = new callback_t (test);
myfunction (callback, IntPtr.Zero);

I tried changing the data parameter from a byte array to an IntPtr, but
that seems to make no difference. What am I doing wrong? All other
functions (without a callback function parameter) work perfect.

I think C# is somehow messing up the stack of my C DLL. If I export this
very simple function in my DLL (declared as extern "C" to avoid name
mangling):

typedef void (*callback_t) (const unsigned char *data, unsigned int
size, void *userdata);

void
myfunction (callback_t callback, void *userdata)
{
unsigned char data[] = {'a', 'b', 'c', 0x00};
printf ("pointer=%p\n" , data);
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 5; ++i) {
printf ("iteration %u\n", i);
if (callback)
callback (NULL, sizeof (data), userdata);
printf ("pointer=%p\n" , data);
}
}

And in C#, I use this code:

delegate void callback_t (IntPtr data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata);
[DllImport("mydl l.dll")]
static extern void myfunction (callback_t callback, IntPtr userdata);

static void test (IntPtr data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata)
{
// Nothing here
}

Now, if I call the DLL functon in my main function with the following
arguments:

myfunction1 (new callback_t (test), IntPtr.Zero);

I get this output:

pointer=0012F5F 0
iteration 0
pointer=0012F5F C
iteration 1
pointer=0012F60 8
iteration 2
pointer=0012F61 4
iteration 3
pointer=0012F62 0
iteration 4
pointer=0012F62 C

As you can see, the "data" pointer is increased by 12 bytes after each
invocation of the callback function, even if this pointer was never
passed to the callback function at all. If I pass "null" for the
callback function, the pointer remains the same. If I do the same
experiment in a C project, the pointer remains the same, just as it
should be. What am I doing wrong?
The problem was caused by the difference in calling convention between
the C DLL (cdecl) and the C# callback function (stdcall). I was able to
fix that by changing the calling convention of the callback function to
cdecl (.NET 2.x or higher only):

[UnmanagedFuncti onPointer (CallingConvent ion.Cdecl)]
public delegate void callback_t (IntPtr data, UInt32 size, IntPtr userdata);
Jul 28 '08 #6

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

6
10860
by: prettysmurfed | last post by:
Hi all I have a bit of a problem, the subject of this post is almost selfexplaing. But here goes: Heres an example of the code I want to implement, its all nice and simple, but the flaw is I can't seem to get the adress of the member function stated properly in the DialogBox function. I thought it was enough to write it as Dialog::DlgProc, if it was a normal situation and DlgProc was a normal function (not member of anything) then you...
6
5319
by: Eric Entressangle | last post by:
Hi all, is there any trouble setting an C++ static class method as callback function for a C program or library ? Thanks
5
551
by: Pratik | last post by:
what are callback functions? Where we require callback functions? In what scenario we require callback functions?
15
1993
by: Felix Kater | last post by:
Hi, in a given library I register callback functions with this function: bool set_callback(int index, int (*callback_function)(long)); I need the callback function to also pass the index which is, however, not (re-)passed by the callback function. Normally, I would just register callback functions for each
0
1498
by: Mark Harrison | last post by:
HOWTO: Integrating Posgresql queries into an event loop. Mark Harrison mh@pixar.com May 27, 2004 Problem ------- The commonly used postgresql APIs will block until completed.
4
5882
by: Jimmy | last post by:
I need to use Asynchronous Socket functions in a server application and am learning from sources such as the MSDN2 (http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bbx2eya8.aspx). What I observed is that all callback handlers in examples are static functions. I did try non-static callback handlers; they certainly works, and they usually make my code simpler. For example, a typical tutorial will start an asynchronous connection with:
4
4797
by: Edwin Gomez | last post by:
I'm a C# developer and I'm new to Python. I would like to know if the concept of Asynchronous call-backs exists in Python. Basically what I mean is that I dispatch a thread and when the thread completes it invokes a method from the calling thread. Sort event driven concept with threads. Thanks. Ed Gomez
6
7666
by: smmk25 | last post by:
Before I state the problem, I just want to let the readers know, I am knew to C++\CLI and interop so please forgive any newbie questions. I have a huge C library which I want to be able to use in a .NET application and thus am looking into writing a managed C++ wrapper for in vs2005. Furthermore, this library has many callback hooks which need to be implemented by the C++ wrapper. These callback functions are declared as "extern C...
2
4115
by: Evan Burkitt | last post by:
Hi, all. I have a Windows DLL that exports a number of functions. These functions expect to receive a pointer to a callback function and an opaque void* parameter. The callback functions are typedef'd to take void* parameters, through which the DLL's function passes its void* parameter to the callback function. This allows me to use class instances as callback handlers, as in the example below. //Executable and DLL know this:
0
8337
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
0
8851
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed. This is as boiled down as I can make it. Here is my compilation command: g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp Here is the code in...
0
8628
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
0
7359
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
0
5650
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
0
4335
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
1
2754
by: 6302768590 | last post by:
Hai team i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
2
1978
muto222
by: muto222 | last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
2
1739
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.