11 12548
On Nov 23, 8:22 am, "Alexander Vasilevsky" <al...@alvas.ne twrote:
Linq "into" and "let" equally???
Do you mean "do they do the same thing"? If so, do you mean
"select ... into" rather than "group ... into"?
I'll assume you mean "select ... into". They're not quite the same.
When you do "select ... into" you have a *single* range variable at
that point; any previous range variables are gone, basically.
If you do "let" then it just introduces a *new* range variable. So,
for instance, you could do:
var query = from x in Enumerable.Rang e(0, 10)
let y = x*2
select x+y;
But if you do:
var query = from x in Enumerable.Rang e(0, 10)
select x*2 into y
select x+y;
it will fail, because at the "x+y" stage "x" is no longer available.
(I haven't tried the above code yet - I'm about to do so when I've
installed 3.5 onto my laptop.)
Jon
Jon Skeet [C# MVP] wrote:
On Nov 23, 8:22 am, "Alexander Vasilevsky" <al...@alvas.ne twrote:
Linq "into" and "let" equally???
Do you mean "do they do the same thing"? If so, do you mean
"select ... into" rather than "group ... into"?
I'll assume you mean "select ... into". They're not quite the same.
When you do "select ... into" you have a single range variable at
that point; any previous range variables are gone, basically.
If you do "let" then it just introduces a new range variable. So,
for instance, you could do:
var query = from x in Enumerable.Rang e(0, 10)
let y = x*2
select x+y;
But if you do:
var query = from x in Enumerable.Rang e(0, 10)
select x*2 into y
select x+y;
With queries like that, I always wonder why on earth would anyone want
to use that construct in that way...
I mean: why would anyone use select <expressionin to <var? Or am I
the only one who finds the painful mix between set oriented
functionality and imperative programming within linq a bit 'odd' ?
FB
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET
LLBLGen Pro website: http://www.llblgen.com
My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma
Microsoft MVP (C#)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 23, 9:27 am, "Frans Bouma [C# MVP]"
<perseus.usenet NOS...@xs4all.n lwrote:
But if you do:
var query = from x in Enumerable.Rang e(0, 10)
select x*2 into y
select x+y;
With queries like that, I always wonder why on earth would anyone want
to use that construct in that way...
I mean: why would anyone use select <expressionin to <var? Or am I
the only one who finds the painful mix between set oriented
functionality and imperative programming within linq a bit 'odd' ?
It's a good indicator that the only thing you care about from the
previous query is the actual result of the select - no intermediate
stuff needs to be propagated. (This could also make things a bit more
efficient in some cases, although that's rarely an issue.)
I'd personally write it as two queries:
var firstQuery = from x in source where blah select foo;
var secondQuery = from bar in firstQuery where ...;
which is basically the same thing, but a bit clearer IMO. There's room
for personal preference though :)
Jon
Thank You! Very good example! http://www.alvas.net - Audio tools for C# and VB.Net developers
"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.co m???????/???????? ? ????????
?????????:
news:c0******** *************** ***********@o42 g2000hsc.google groups.com...
On Nov 23, 8:22 am, "Alexander Vasilevsky" <al...@alvas.ne twrote:
>Linq "into" and "let" equally???
Do you mean "do they do the same thing"? If so, do you mean
"select ... into" rather than "group ... into"?
I'll assume you mean "select ... into". They're not quite the same.
When you do "select ... into" you have a *single* range variable at
that point; any previous range variables are gone, basically.
If you do "let" then it just introduces a *new* range variable. So,
for instance, you could do:
var query = from x in Enumerable.Rang e(0, 10)
let y = x*2
select x+y;
But if you do:
var query = from x in Enumerable.Rang e(0, 10)
select x*2 into y
select x+y;
it will fail, because at the "x+y" stage "x" is no longer available.
(I haven't tried the above code yet - I'm about to do so when I've
installed 3.5 onto my laptop.)
Jon
Why painful? http://www.alvas.net - Audio tools for C# and VB.Net developers
"Frans Bouma [C# MVP]" <pe************ ******@xs4all.n l???????/???????? ?
???????? ?????????: news:xn******** *******@news.mi crosoft.com...
Jon Skeet [C# MVP] wrote:
>On Nov 23, 8:22 am, "Alexander Vasilevsky" <al...@alvas.ne twrote:
Linq "into" and "let" equally???
Do you mean "do they do the same thing"? If so, do you mean "select ... into" rather than "group ... into"?
I'll assume you mean "select ... into". They're not quite the same. When you do "select ... into" you have a single range variable at that point; any previous range variables are gone, basically.
If you do "let" then it just introduces a new range variable. So, for instance, you could do:
var query = from x in Enumerable.Rang e(0, 10) let y = x*2 select x+y;
But if you do:
var query = from x in Enumerable.Rang e(0, 10) select x*2 into y select x+y;
With queries like that, I always wonder why on earth would anyone want
to use that construct in that way...
I mean: why would anyone use select <expressionin to <var? Or am I
the only one who finds the painful mix between set oriented
functionality and imperative programming within linq a bit 'odd' ?
FB
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET
LLBLGen Pro website: http://www.llblgen.com
My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma
Microsoft MVP (C#)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexander Vasilevsky wrote:
Why painful?
because it keeps people in an imperative mindset, which means that
they can't use the set-oriented functionality in full potential.
Perfect examples are people who write long pieces of SQL with cursors
because they don't understand how set-oriented languages work.
FB
>
"Frans Bouma [C# MVP]" <pe************ ******@xs4all.n l>
???????/???????? ? ???????? ?????????:
news:xn******** *******@news.mi crosoft.com...
Jon Skeet [C# MVP] wrote:
>On Nov 23, 8:22 am, "Alexander Vasilevsky" <al...@alvas.ne twrote: Linq "into" and "let" equally???
>
Do you mean "do they do the same thing"? If so, do you mean
"select ... into" rather than "group ... into"?
>
I'll assume you mean "select ... into". They're not quite the
same. When you do "select ... into" you have a single range
variable at that point; any previous range variables are gone,
basically.
>
If you do "let" then it just introduces a new range variable. So,
for instance, you could do:
>
var query = from x in Enumerable.Rang e(0, 10)
let y = x*2
select x+y;
>
But if you do:
>
var query = from x in Enumerable.Rang e(0, 10)
select x*2 into y
select x+y;
With queries like that, I always wonder why on earth would anyone
want to use that construct in that way...
I mean: why would anyone use select <expressionin to <var? Or am I
the only one who finds the painful mix between set oriented
functionality and imperative programming within linq a bit 'odd' ?
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET
LLBLGen Pro website: http://www.llblgen.com
My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma
Microsoft MVP (C#)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frans Bouma [C# MVP] <pe************ ******@xs4all.n lwrote:
Why painful?
because it keeps people in an imperative mindset, which means that
they can't use the set-oriented functionality in full potential.
Perfect examples are people who write long pieces of SQL with cursors
because they don't understand how set-oriented languages work.
I don't see how it keeps people in an imperative mindset. It allows
them to express that the sequence which is the result of the "select"
is all they need for the next part of their query.
LINQ isn't actually set-oriented - it's sequence-oriented, a pipeline.
It may be convenient to think in terms of sets when writing LINQ to
SQL, but LINQ to Objects should *definitely* be considered in terms of
sequences.
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.co m> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk
Jon Skeet [C# MVP] wrote:
Frans Bouma [C# MVP] <pe************ ******@xs4all.n lwrote:
Why painful?
because it keeps people in an imperative mindset, which means that
they can't use the set-oriented functionality in full potential.
Perfect examples are people who write long pieces of SQL with
cursors because they don't understand how set-oriented languages
work.
I don't see how it keeps people in an imperative mindset. It allows
them to express that the sequence which is the result of the "select"
is all they need for the next part of their query.
LINQ isn't actually set-oriented - it's sequence-oriented, a
pipeline. It may be convenient to think in terms of sets when
writing LINQ to SQL, but LINQ to Objects should definitely be
considered in terms of sequences.
A query which is executed on a db, will end up as a set-oriented
statement. If you write your query as imperative as possible, you WILL
probably have a slow query. A query written to be executed on a DB
should be written with set operations in mind, otherwise you will end
up sooner or later at the wrong end of the DBA-developer conversation
where you need to optimize the query to make it performing properly but
you don't know how.
FB
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET
LLBLGen Pro website: http://www.llblgen.com
My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma
Microsoft MVP (C#)
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: les_ander |
last post by:
Hi,
suppose I am reading lines from a file or stdin.
I want to just "peek" in to the next line, and if it starts
with a special character I want to break out of a for loop,
other wise I want to do readline().
Is there a way to do this?
for example:
while 1:
line=stdin.peek_nextline()
|
by: Amir S. |
last post by:
Hi,
I'm a newbie to C++ (2 weeks into the course). We were given this
assignment to write some code that reads a set of integers (grades)
from a file (filename passed by console), outputs them in reverse
order, calculates and prints their average.
=> We have been told that we need to make sure that our code meets
"information hiding" guidelines. Could anyone help me get started with
this (any ideas?)
|
by: Big Dave |
last post by:
I'm having trouble using the update command of a dataadapter. It
would help if I could watch it go through each record in the datatable
and see what it's doing. Is there a way to do this? Also, is there a
way to see the actual sql statements it's executing, with the value of
the parameters, for each update it performs?
Thanks for any help you can offer.
|
by: Ian Sparks |
last post by:
This is probably stupid and/or misguided but supposing I'm passed a byte-string value that I want to be unicode, this is what I do. I'm sure I'm missing something very important.
Short version :
>>> s = "José" #Start with non-unicode string
>>> unicoded = eval("u'%s'" % "José")
Long version :
>>> s = "José" #Start with non-unicode string
|
by: imonline |
last post by:
Hi,
I am generating XML and setting it into the string field. Which will be
again generated into xml. Now the last xml which has xml in string
field converts into ">" for the xml which is set into string field.
Can you please let me know what am I doing wrong.
Thanks,
Nis
| |
by: =?Utf-8?B?QWxleCBNYWdoZW4=?= |
last post by:
Does anyone know why I have no "Step Into" option during debugging in VS
2005/C# app? I have "Step Over" but no "Step Into" even though it would be
stepping into one of my own functions inside the same .cs file.
|
by: NoWorries |
last post by:
I am getting hung up on how to get a piece of data into a char array the way it is being handled, here is a few snippets in order to help show what I'm trying to do.
a call is made
myQueue.addItem("green");
which goes to this
QueueItem *pQI = new QueueItem(pData, ++mNodeCounter);
|
by: Prisoner at War |
last post by:
Hi, your friendly neighborhood n00b here, just wondering why on earth
the Py3K folks want to mess with a simple thing like the "print"
"command" (is that what it's called, a command?), turning it into
"print()"...I mean, what's the point, exactly?? To look like a more
"traditional" computer-language format?
And what's with not supporting the so-called softspace "feature" of
the current "print" command, where a space after a comma, like
|
by: dominique |
last post by:
Hello All,
In a wx GUI, I would like to let the user choose between >, < or =.
So, I created a combobox and when the user chooses ">" for instance, I
wanted to return (the objective is to send the operator into another
complex method):
Example:
if variable == ">":
return >
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |