Asynchronous I/O really saves resources?

[Morgan Cheng]

Asynchronous I/O is said to be using native completion port. However,
i checked rotor2.0 code, it seems not
in stream.cs. BeginRead is defined in below way. In my understanding,
If BeginInvoke is used, the task is queued; and when there is free
worker thread in ThreadPool, the task is performed in specified worker
thread. Then, Asynchronous I/O doesn't save thread in ThreadPool. Is
my understanding correct?
[HostProtection( ExternalThreadi ng=true)]
public virtual IAsyncResult BeginRead(byte[] buffer, int
offset, int count, AsyncCallback callback, Object state)
{
if (!CanRead) __Error.ReadNot Supported();

// Increment the count to account for this async operation
BCLDebug.Assert (_asyncActiveCo unt >= 1, "ref counting
mismatch, possible race in the code");
Interlocked.Inc rement(ref _asyncActiveCou nt);

ReadDelegate d = new ReadDelegate(Re ad);

// To avoid a race with a stream's position pointer &
generating race
// conditions with internal buffer indexes in our own
streams that
// don't natively support async IO operations when there
are multiple
// async requests outstanding, we will block the
application's main
// thread if it does a second IO request until the first
one completes.
if (_asyncActiveEv ent == null) {
lock(this) {
if (_asyncActiveEv ent == null)
_asyncActiveEve nt = new AutoResetEvent( true);
}
}
bool r = _asyncActiveEve nt.WaitOne();
BCLDebug.Assert (r, "AutoResetE vent didn't get a signal
when we called WaitOne!");

BCLDebug.Assert (_readDelegate == null && _writeDelegate ==
null, "Expected no other readers or writers!");

// Set delegate before we call BeginInvoke, to avoid a
race
_readDelegate = d;
IAsyncResult asyncResult = d.BeginInvoke(b uffer, offset,
count, callback, state);

return asyncResult;
}

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

On Jun 26, 6:42 am, Morgan Cheng <morgan.chen... @gmail.comwrote :

Asynchronous I/O is said to be using native completion port. However,
i checked rotor2.0 code, it seems not
in stream.cs. BeginRead is defined in below way. In my understanding,
If BeginInvoke is used, the task is queued; and when there is free
worker thread in ThreadPool, the task is performed in specified worker
thread. Then, Asynchronous I/O doesn't save thread in ThreadPool. Is
my understanding correct?

1) The code for Rotor isn't exactly the same as the code for .NET
2) You're looking at just Stream.BeginRea d, which is virtual. Stream
itself can't use IO completion ports, as it doesn't know whether the
stream *actually* uses anything that IO completion ports are
interested in (think about StringReader, for example). Instead,
derived classes (such as FileStream) are responsible for providing
more performant implementations where appropriate.

Jon

[Morgan Cheng]

On Jun 26, 3:09 pm, "Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <[e-mail] wrote:

On Jun 26, 6:42 am, Morgan Cheng <morgan.chen... @gmail.comwrote :

Asynchronous I/O is said to be using native completion port. However,
i checked rotor2.0 code, it seems not
in stream.cs. BeginRead is defined in below way. In my understanding,
If BeginInvoke is used, the task is queued; and when there is free
worker thread in ThreadPool, the task is performed in specified worker
thread. Then, Asynchronous I/O doesn't save thread in ThreadPool. Is
my understanding correct?

1) The code for Rotor isn't exactly the same as the code for .NET

Yes, but I suppose major design is same.

2) You're looking at just Stream.BeginRea d, which is virtual. Stream
itself can't use IO completion ports, as it doesn't know whether the
stream *actually* uses anything that IO completion ports are
interested in (think about StringReader, for example). Instead,
derived classes (such as FileStream) are responsible for providing
more performant implementations where appropriate.

In some post, it is said FileStream is using completion port. In
FileStream.cs, it reads
return base.BeginRead( array, offset, numBytes, userCallback,
stateObject);
Simply call basclass(Stream )'s implementation.

Well, by calling BeginInvoke(), the queued task is surely called by
worker thread? or it is possible to be performed by I/O thread in
thread pool?

>
Jon

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

On Jun 26, 8:16 am, Morgan Cheng <morgan.chen... @gmail.comwrote :

1) The code for Rotor isn't exactly the same as the code for .NET

Yes, but I suppose major design is same.

It was at one point - but I doubt that nearly as much work as gone
into optimising Rotor. Bear in mind that Rotor also works on non-MS
platforms, not all of which even *have* IO completion ports.

2) You're looking at just Stream.BeginRea d, which is virtual. Stream
itself can't use IO completion ports, as it doesn't know whether the
stream *actually* uses anything that IO completion ports are
interested in (think about StringReader, for example). Instead,
derived classes (such as FileStream) are responsible for providing
more performant implementations where appropriate.

In some post, it is said FileStream is using completion port. In
FileStream.cs, it reads
return base.BeginRead( array, offset, numBytes, userCallback,
stateObject);
Simply call basclass(Stream )'s implementation.

For Rotor, right? Don't assume that's the same for .NET.

Well, by calling BeginInvoke(), the queued task is surely called by
worker thread? or it is possible to be performed by I/O thread in
thread pool?

That implementation will just use the thread pool, by the looks of it.
Again, don't assume the same is true for .NET itself.

Jon