Is it possible to make generalized methods that accept parameterized references to call other methods?

I am enjoying making generalized methods to serve common needs, such as:
ImageProcessing .MakeQuickResiz e();
ImageProcessing .Sharpen();
FileOps.CreateY earAndMonthAndD ayDirectoryBase dOnDate()
Sender.EmailCom maDelimitedList ()

What would be really cool is if I could make a generalized function that
would accept other methods as parameters, and would perform the methods on
another parameterized item that's fed to the function. So we might have the
equivalent of the following

public void ExecuteParamete rizedMethodsOnE veryFileInADire ctory( string
targetPath, MakeQuickResize (100,100), Sharpen(), ConvertToGray() ,
RegisterInDb(), RenameByDBRefer ence() ) ...

Is what I'm speculating about possible? Is this something that maybe
delegates are good for? (Have never used them...) If it is, can someone
suggest the right syntax? What I posit above is clearly wrong syntactically.

Finally, if it is possible to chain up methods in this way, I'm wondering if
there's any way to pass around return types to other members of the chain. A
hypothetical example would be:
Method 1 registers a filename in a database system, and a new filename is
derived from the DateTime stamp of creation
Method 2 uses that filename that was returned as a string to execute
something else.

Thanks for any insight you can offer.

-KF

[Ian Semmel]

Yes, you can use delegates to pass functions as parameters.

A basis for what you need could be something like this

public delegate int intproc1(string fn);
public delegate int intproc2(string fn1, string fn2);

int GetLength(strin g s)
{
return s.Length;
}

int GetTwiceLength( string s)
{
return s.Length * 2;
}

int GetDoubleLength (string s1, string s2)
{
return s1.Length + s2.Length;
}

public void Ex(string s, intproc2 p2, params intproc1[] procs)
{
Console.WriteLi ne ( p2 ( s, s ).ToString () );

foreach (intproc1 ip in procs)
{
Console.WriteLi ne ( ip(s).ToString () );
}
}

public void DoTest()
{
intproc1 p1 = GetLength;
intproc1 p2 = GetTwiceLength;

Ex("This string", GetDoubleLength , GetLength, GetTwiceLength, p2, p1);
Ex("Another string", GetDoubleLength );
}
<ke*****@nospam .nospamwrote in message
news:ew******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...

>I am enjoying making generalized methods to serve common needs, such as:
ImageProcessing .MakeQuickResiz e();
ImageProcessing .Sharpen();
FileOps.CreateY earAndMonthAndD ayDirectoryBase dOnDate()
Sender.EmailCom maDelimitedList ()

What would be really cool is if I could make a generalized function that
would accept other methods as parameters, and would perform the methods on
another parameterized item that's fed to the function. So we might have
the equivalent of the following

public void ExecuteParamete rizedMethodsOnE veryFileInADire ctory( string
targetPath, MakeQuickResize (100,100), Sharpen(), ConvertToGray() ,
RegisterInDb(), RenameByDBRefer ence() ) ...

Is what I'm speculating about possible? Is this something that maybe
delegates are good for? (Have never used them...) If it is, can someone
suggest the right syntax? What I posit above is clearly wrong
syntactically.

Finally, if it is possible to chain up methods in this way, I'm wondering
if there's any way to pass around return types to other members of the
chain. A hypothetical example would be:
Method 1 registers a filename in a database system, and a new filename is
derived from the DateTime stamp of creation
Method 2 uses that filename that was returned as a string to execute
something else.

Thanks for any insight you can offer.

-KF

Exactly what I needed to know, Ian. Thanks so much for your clear and
concise code, it all makes sense. This will be very helpful.

Just curious: does anyone know when delegates were first invented and
generally implemented as a language construct? I find the evolution of
programming languages very interesting: it's fascinating how abstract and
high-level languages like C# have become, and I'm interested in the history
of how we got here.

-KF

"Ian Semmel" <an****@rocketc omp.com.auwrote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP03.phx.gbl. ..

Yes, you can use delegates to pass functions as parameters.

A basis for what you need could be something like this

public delegate int intproc1(string fn);
public delegate int intproc2(string fn1, string fn2);

int GetLength(strin g s)
{
return s.Length;
}

int GetTwiceLength( string s)
{
return s.Length * 2;
}

int GetDoubleLength (string s1, string s2)
{
return s1.Length + s2.Length;
}

public void Ex(string s, intproc2 p2, params intproc1[] procs)
{
Console.WriteLi ne ( p2 ( s, s ).ToString () );

foreach (intproc1 ip in procs)
{
Console.WriteLi ne ( ip(s).ToString () );
}
}

public void DoTest()
{
intproc1 p1 = GetLength;
intproc1 p2 = GetTwiceLength;

Ex("This string", GetDoubleLength , GetLength, GetTwiceLength, p2, p1);
Ex("Another string", GetDoubleLength );
}
<ke*****@nospam .nospamwrote in message
news:ew******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...

>>I am enjoying making generalized methods to serve common needs, such as:
ImageProcessin g.MakeQuickResi ze();
ImageProcessin g.Sharpen();
FileOps.Create YearAndMonthAnd DayDirectoryBas edOnDate()
Sender.EmailCo mmaDelimitedLis t()

What would be really cool is if I could make a generalized function that
would accept other methods as parameters, and would perform the methods
on another parameterized item that's fed to the function. So we might
have the equivalent of the following

public void ExecuteParamete rizedMethodsOnE veryFileInADire ctory( string
targetPath, MakeQuickResize (100,100), Sharpen(), ConvertToGray() ,
RegisterInDb() , RenameByDBRefer ence() ) ...

Is what I'm speculating about possible? Is this something that maybe
delegates are good for? (Have never used them...) If it is, can someone
suggest the right syntax? What I posit above is clearly wrong
syntacticall y.

Finally, if it is possible to chain up methods in this way, I'm wondering
if there's any way to pass around return types to other members of the
chain. A hypothetical example would be:
Method 1 registers a filename in a database system, and a new filename is
derived from the DateTime stamp of creation
Method 2 uses that filename that was returned as a string to execute
something else.

Thanks for any insight you can offer.

-KF

[Fred Mellender]

The first widely used language to pass functions as parameters was Lisp,
invented in 1958 by John McCarthy. There is a nice history on Wikipedia.

<ke*****@nospam .nospamwrote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP05.phx.gbl. ..

>
Exactly what I needed to know, Ian. Thanks so much for your clear and
concise code, it all makes sense. This will be very helpful.

Just curious: does anyone know when delegates were first invented and
generally implemented as a language construct? I find the evolution of
programming languages very interesting: it's fascinating how abstract and
high-level languages like C# have become, and I'm interested in the
history of how we got here.

-KF

"Ian Semmel" <an****@rocketc omp.com.auwrote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP03.phx.gbl. ..

>Yes, you can use delegates to pass functions as parameters.

A basis for what you need could be something like this

public delegate int intproc1(string fn);
public delegate int intproc2(string fn1, string fn2);

int GetLength(strin g s)
{
return s.Length;
}

int GetTwiceLength( string s)
{
return s.Length * 2;
}

int GetDoubleLength (string s1, string s2)
{
return s1.Length + s2.Length;
}

public void Ex(string s, intproc2 p2, params intproc1[] procs)
{
Console.WriteLi ne ( p2 ( s, s ).ToString () );

foreach (intproc1 ip in procs)
{
Console.WriteLi ne ( ip(s).ToString () );
}
}

public void DoTest()
{
intproc1 p1 = GetLength;
intproc1 p2 = GetTwiceLength;

Ex("This string", GetDoubleLength , GetLength, GetTwiceLength, p2, p1);
Ex("Another string", GetDoubleLength );
}
<ke*****@nospa m.nospamwrote in message
news:ew******* *******@TK2MSFT NGP03.phx.gbl.. .

>>>I am enjoying making generalized methods to serve common needs, such as:
ImageProcessi ng.MakeQuickRes ize();
ImageProcessi ng.Sharpen();
FileOps.Creat eYearAndMonthAn dDayDirectoryBa sedOnDate()
Sender.EmailC ommaDelimitedLi st()

What would be really cool is if I could make a generalized function that
would accept other methods as parameters, and would perform the methods
on another parameterized item that's fed to the function. So we might
have the equivalent of the following

public void ExecuteParamete rizedMethodsOnE veryFileInADire ctory( string
targetPath, MakeQuickResize (100,100), Sharpen(), ConvertToGray() ,
RegisterInDb( ), RenameByDBRefer ence() ) ...

Is what I'm speculating about possible? Is this something that maybe
delegates are good for? (Have never used them...) If it is, can someone
suggest the right syntax? What I posit above is clearly wrong
syntactically .

Finally, if it is possible to chain up methods in this way, I'm
wondering if there's any way to pass around return types to other
members of the chain. A hypothetical example would be:
Method 1 registers a filename in a database system, and a new filename
is derived from the DateTime stamp of creation
Method 2 uses that filename that was returned as a string to execute
something else.

Thanks for any insight you can offer.

-KF