Hi all, I've got a client/server application and just wanted to ensure
that this is expected behavior. I recently set the following
configuration in Visual Studio:
Debug->Exceptions->Break Into Debugger
for the CLR Exceptions
And when my debugger hits the TcpClient.Conne ct statement and the
server is not available - I get the following three first chance
exceptions:
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: The requested name is valid and was found in
the database, but it does not have the correct associated data being
resolved for
----------------
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: A connection attempt failed because the
connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or
established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond
----------------
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: A connection attempt failed because the
connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or
established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond
----------------
I handle the exception and my code continues on its merry way - I just
wanted to see if anyone could provide some insight on this.
Thanks,
Novice
7  1973 
A socket exception when the server is not available is normal yes.
<il***********@ gmail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ m73g2000cwd.goo glegroups.com.. .
Hi all, I've got a client/server application and just wanted to ensure
that this is expected behavior. I recently set the following
configuration in Visual Studio:
Debug->Exceptions->Break Into Debugger
for the CLR Exceptions
And when my debugger hits the TcpClient.Conne ct statement and the
server is not available - I get the following three first chance
exceptions:
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: The requested name is valid and was found in
the database, but it does not have the correct associated data being
resolved for
----------------
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: A connection attempt failed because the
connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or
established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond
----------------
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: A connection attempt failed because the
connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or
established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond
----------------
I handle the exception and my code continues on its merry way - I just
wanted to see if anyone could provide some insight on this.
Thanks,
Novice
I handle the socket exception that is eventually thrown - but that
single method actually causes three first chance exceptions (one of
which is the one it eventually throws and which I handle).
Daniel wrote:
A socket exception when the server is not available is normal yes.
<il***********@ gmail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ m73g2000cwd.goo glegroups.com.. .
Hi all, I've got a client/server application and just wanted to ensure
that this is expected behavior. I recently set the following
configuration in Visual Studio:
Debug->Exceptions->Break Into Debugger
for the CLR Exceptions
And when my debugger hits the TcpClient.Conne ct statement and the
server is not available - I get the following three first chance
exceptions:
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: The requested name is valid and was found in
the database, but it does not have the correct associated data being
resolved for
----------------
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: A connection attempt failed because the
connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or
established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond
----------------
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: A connection attempt failed because the
connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or
established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond
----------------
I handle the exception and my code continues on its merry way - I just
wanted to see if anyone could provide some insight on this.
Thanks,
Novice
When the server is available, do you get these exceptions?
<il***********@ gmail.comwrote in message
news:11******** *************@f 16g2000cwb.goog legroups.com...
>I handle the socket exception that is eventually thrown - but that
single method actually causes three first chance exceptions (one of
which is the one it eventually throws and which I handle).
Daniel wrote:
>A socket exception when the server is not available is normal yes.
<il*********** @gmail.comwrote in message
news:11******* *************** @m73g2000cwd.go oglegroups.com. ..
Hi all, I've got a client/server application and just wanted to ensure
that this is expected behavior. I recently set the following
configuration in Visual Studio:
Debug->Exceptions->Break Into Debugger
for the CLR Exceptions
And when my debugger hits the TcpClient.Conne ct statement and the
server is not available - I get the following three first chance
exceptions:
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: The requested name is valid and was found in
the database, but it does not have the correct associated data being
resolved for
----------------
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: A connection attempt failed because the
connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or
established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond
----------------
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: A connection attempt failed because the
connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or
established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond
----------------
I handle the exception and my code continues on its merry way - I just
wanted to see if anyone could provide some insight on this.
Thanks,
Novice
Hey there - I guess I wasn't clear in my original post. I fully
expected and handle getting an exception thrown (when the server is
unavailable). I was just surprised by getting three first chance
exceptions. The first one looks like the name lookup in the DNS server
fails and then the other two look slightly redudant.
I guess I just wanted clarification on those three first chance
exceptions that are thrown from within the Connect method (the last of
which is the one I handle).
Novice
Daniel wrote:
When the server is available, do you get these exceptions?
<il***********@ gmail.comwrote in message
news:11******** *************@f 16g2000cwb.goog legroups.com...
I handle the socket exception that is eventually thrown - but that
single method actually causes three first chance exceptions (one of
which is the one it eventually throws and which I handle).
Daniel wrote:
A socket exception when the server is not available is normal yes.
<il***********@ gmail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ m73g2000cwd.goo glegroups.com.. .
Hi all, I've got a client/server application and just wanted to ensure
that this is expected behavior. I recently set the following
configuration in Visual Studio:
Debug->Exceptions->Break Into Debugger
for the CLR Exceptions
And when my debugger hits the TcpClient.Conne ct statement and the
server is not available - I get the following three first chance
exceptions:
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: The requested name is valid and was found in
the database, but it does not have the correct associated data being
resolved for
----------------
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: A connection attempt failed because the
connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or
established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond
----------------
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: A connection attempt failed because the
connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or
established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond
----------------
I handle the exception and my code continues on its merry way - I just
wanted to see if anyone could provide some insight on this.
Thanks,
Novice
Well if your server isnt available chances are it tries doing its connection
logic and goes oops i cant do this, and oops i cant do that either etc etc.
I'd only be concerned if when you connect successfully you get excpetions.
If you don't then don't worry about it :)
<il***********@ gmail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ b28g2000cwb.goo glegroups.com.. .
Hey there - I guess I wasn't clear in my original post. I fully
expected and handle getting an exception thrown (when the server is
unavailable). I was just surprised by getting three first chance
exceptions. The first one looks like the name lookup in the DNS server
fails and then the other two look slightly redudant.
I guess I just wanted clarification on those three first chance
exceptions that are thrown from within the Connect method (the last of
which is the one I handle).
Novice
Daniel wrote:
>When the server is available, do you get these exceptions?
<il*********** @gmail.comwrote in message
news:11******* **************@ f16g2000cwb.goo glegroups.com.. .
>I handle the socket exception that is eventually thrown - but that
single method actually causes three first chance exceptions (one of
which is the one it eventually throws and which I handle).
Daniel wrote:
A socket exception when the server is not available is normal yes.
<il*********** @gmail.comwrote in message
news:11******* *************** @m73g2000cwd.go oglegroups.com. ..
Hi all, I've got a client/server application and just wanted to
ensure
that this is expected behavior. I recently set the following
configuration in Visual Studio:
Debug->Exceptions->Break Into Debugger
for the CLR Exceptions
And when my debugger hits the TcpClient.Conne ct statement and the
server is not available - I get the following three first chance
exceptions:
A first chance exception of type
'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: The requested name is valid and was found in
the database, but it does not have the correct associated data being
resolved for
----------------
A first chance exception of type
'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: A connection attempt failed because the
connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or
established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond
----------------
A first chance exception of type
'System.Net.Soc kets.SocketExce ption'
occurred in system.dll
Additional information: A connection attempt failed because the
connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or
established connection failed because connected host has failed to
respond
----------------
I handle the exception and my code continues on its merry way - I
just
wanted to see if anyone could provide some insight on this.
Thanks,
Novice
il***********@g mail.com wrote:
Hey there - I guess I wasn't clear in my original post. I fully
expected and handle getting an exception thrown (when the server is
unavailable). I was just surprised by getting three first chance
exceptions. The first one looks like the name lookup in the DNS server
fails and then the other two look slightly redudant.
I guess I just wanted clarification on those three first chance
exceptions that are thrown from within the Connect method (the last of
which is the one I handle).
Novice
Hi,
You've chosen to look at all first chance exceptions, not just all
unhandled exceptions. The first two are being handled somewhere in the
framework, obviously. You'd be surprised how many exceptions the
framework can throw (I thought I'd seriously crippled an ASP.Net
program where it would only start debugging without throwing an
exception about 1 in 5 times. Then I remembered that I'd turned on
break on all first chance exceptions).
I guess the question in my mind is why you've chosen to inspect all
first chance exceptions, and why you think these exceptions should be a
matter of concern. Is it idle curiosity (which I certainly always
welcome, but I'm not going to necessarily go hunting myself for
explanations) or are you encountering a problem and trying to
understand the underlying cause (in which case I may go exploring,
which I enjoy doing sometimes). If it's the second case, it may be more
worthwhile explaining what your initial area of concern is, rather than
this current rather narrowly focussed debugging attempt.
Damien
The reason I'm wondering about it is because:
1. This connect attempt and eventual failure takes about 5-10 seconds -
I want to know why.
2. I also wonder if there is a configuration I can give to the
TcpClient (perhaps in its constructor or using an overloaded version of
the Connect method) to make it operate more efficiently. A good
example is that because of the first chance exceptions I know part of
that time is being spent doing a name-lookup. If I use the raw IP
Address I could avoid that cost.
Novice
Damien wrote:
il***********@g mail.com wrote:
Hey there - I guess I wasn't clear in my original post. I fully
expected and handle getting an exception thrown (when the server is
unavailable). I was just surprised by getting three first chance
exceptions. The first one looks like the name lookup in the DNS server
fails and then the other two look slightly redudant.
I guess I just wanted clarification on those three first chance
exceptions that are thrown from within the Connect method (the last of
which is the one I handle).
Novice
Hi,
You've chosen to look at all first chance exceptions, not just all
unhandled exceptions. The first two are being handled somewhere in the
framework, obviously. You'd be surprised how many exceptions the
framework can throw (I thought I'd seriously crippled an ASP.Net
program where it would only start debugging without throwing an
exception about 1 in 5 times. Then I remembered that I'd turned on
break on all first chance exceptions).
I guess the question in my mind is why you've chosen to inspect all
first chance exceptions, and why you think these exceptions should be a
matter of concern. Is it idle curiosity (which I certainly always
welcome, but I'm not going to necessarily go hunting myself for
explanations) or are you encountering a problem and trying to
understand the underlying cause (in which case I may go exploring,
which I enjoy doing sometimes). If it's the second case, it may be more
worthwhile explaining what your initial area of concern is, rather than
this current rather narrowly focussed debugging attempt.
Damien
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Jim |
last post by:
I'm working on my first .net project using c#. I've been using
activex controls embedded in a web page and wanted to do the same in
..net. My approach has been to create a windows control library and
then reference the dll with a web page as follows:
<html>
<body>
<center>
<object id="UserControl1" height="500" width="700"
classid="http://wiffle/WindowsControlLibrary3.dll#WindowsControlLibrary3.UserControl1">
|
by: מורדי |
last post by:
Hi,
I'm writing a client/server application in which the client send a series of
screenshots to the server to be saved using the tcpclient.
in most cases the first screenshot is transmitted ok and arrives at the
server but from after that i only a couple of KB from the start of the file
which cases the picture to display only the very top (of the screen).
All the pictures are saved at the client side before sent to the server and
they...
|
by: Greg Martz |
last post by:
I'd like to do the following in C# and prefer using tcpclient rather
than raw sockets...
Connect to a unix box
Login
run date +%H%M%S
retrieve the response.
That's it, nothing more. This shouldn't be too complicated, I
thought... I have yet to find any examples of being able to do this.
|
by: Horst Walter |
last post by:
What is wrong here?
IPAddress ipAddress = IPAddress.Parse("10.10.20.1");
IPEndPoint ipEndPoint = new IPEndPoint(ipAddress, this.port);
this.tcpClient = new TcpClient(ipEndPoint); // PROBLEM HERE
=> Exception: "The requested address is not valid in its context"
This works:
|
by: Kristian |
last post by:
Hi All.
This test code:
using System.Net.Sockets;
using System.Net;
using System;
class mail{
public static void Main(){
| | |
by: WATYF1 |
last post by:
Hello. I'm writing a VB.NET app to check email message counts for both
POP3 and IMAP4. I'm using TCPClient to connect, and a NetworkStream to
send simple commands. It's a very simple bit of code, actually... the
problem is, if the user is behind a proxy, then the Connect method
fails (times out).
How do I get around this? I thought this would be a common issue and
that there would be plenty of code out there to demonstrate how to...
|
by: Jim W |
last post by:
I have an ASP.NET app that has very slow connect times using TCPClient, or
the Socket class, or even calling a COM object that uses C socket calls on
certain similar XP SP2 boxes.
On those boxes, if another connection is made within a couple seconds, it is
fast. Running the same C# code in a console app connects instantly.
Unplugging the network cable allows localhost connections to be instant (?!).
Running the same ASP.NET app on...
|
by: hamil |
last post by:
I am having trouble using the TcpListener and TcpClient classes.
At the end of this post is server code that runs, and a class whose purpose
is described below.
I need to know when the client closes the connection so I can exit my
listener code. Here is what I have tried.
First I asked MSDN and they said..
|
by: illegal.prime |
last post by:
Hi all, I've got a client/server application and just wanted to ensure
that this is expected behavior. I recently set the following
configuration in Visual Studio:
Debug->Exceptions->Break Into Debugger
for the CLR Exceptions
And when my debugger hits the TcpClient.Connect statement and the
server is not available - I get the following three first chance
exceptions:
A first chance exception of type 'System.Net.Sockets.SocketException'
|
by: Jan Vinten |
last post by:
Hi all,
I got into some trouble trying to bind to a specific IP address.
Code:
Private mobjClient As TcpClient
mobjClient = New TcpClient(IPAddress.Parse("10.16.104.87").ToString,
8892)
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| | |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
| | |
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |
