About TransactionScop e

[kikapu]

Hi to all folks,

i am trying to understand the use of System.Transact ions in general and
TransactionScop e particularly.

What am i allowed to do in a using statement that wraps a TransactionScop e
object,
so this to be rollback in case of an exception or when i do not call
scope.complete ??
I mean, can i set an object's variables and then un-done these sets
automatically
when transaction rolls back ??

For example, the following code does not work, x.var remains 2 after the
suing statement,
even if i throw an exception after var set:

class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
X x = new X();
x.var = 1;
using (TransactionSco pe scope = new
TransactionScop e(TransactionSc opeOption.Suppr ess))
{
x.var = 2;
//scope.Complete( );
}
Console.WriteLi ne(x.var);
}
}
class X
{
public int var;
}
}
I am sure that i am missing something here, can anyone help ??

Kikapu

[Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]]

kikapu,

The TransactionScop e class will only work on resources that register
themselves with the transaction mananger. Right now, the most immediate
example of a resource like this is a database. It doesn't automatically
just detect changes to anything in the scope and then roll them back if
Complete is not called.

However, it is possible to have local variables which are rolled back in
the event of an abort of a transaction. Check out the article by Juval Lowy
titled "Volatile Resource Managers in .NET Bring Transactions to the Common
Type", as it provides a mechanism by which to do this:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/is.../Transactions/

Of course, you shouldn't do this for ALL of your variables (that will be
a huge performance hit), but for the ones that you need rolled back in the
case of an abort.

Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard. caspershouse.co m

"kikapu" <me******@newsg roups.nospamwro te in message
news:ew******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P03.phx.gbl...

Hi to all folks,

i am trying to understand the use of System.Transact ions in general and
TransactionScop e particularly.

What am i allowed to do in a using statement that wraps a TransactionScop e
object,
so this to be rollback in case of an exception or when i do not call
scope.complete ??
I mean, can i set an object's variables and then un-done these sets
automatically
when transaction rolls back ??

For example, the following code does not work, x.var remains 2 after the
suing statement,
even if i throw an exception after var set:

class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
X x = new X();
x.var = 1;
using (TransactionSco pe scope = new
TransactionScop e(TransactionSc opeOption.Suppr ess))
{
x.var = 2;
//scope.Complete( );
}
Console.WriteLi ne(x.var);
}
}
class X
{
public int var;
}
}
I am sure that i am missing something here, can anyone help ??

Kikapu

[kikapu]

Nicholas,

thanks for the reply!

i print now and will read this article that you send me.
Can you please give me a direction on how i can (a simple example)
register a resource with a transaction manager ??

Thanks again!
"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mv*@spam.guard .caspershouse.c omwrote in
message news:O$******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...

kikapu,

The TransactionScop e class will only work on resources that register
themselves with the transaction mananger. Right now, the most immediate
example of a resource like this is a database. It doesn't automatically
just detect changes to anything in the scope and then roll them back if
Complete is not called.

However, it is possible to have local variables which are rolled back
in the event of an abort of a transaction. Check out the article by Juval
Lowy titled "Volatile Resource Managers in .NET Bring Transactions to the
Common Type", as it provides a mechanism by which to do this:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/is.../Transactions/

Of course, you shouldn't do this for ALL of your variables (that will
be a huge performance hit), but for the ones that you need rolled back in
the case of an abort.

Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard. caspershouse.co m

"kikapu" <me******@newsg roups.nospamwro te in message
news:ew******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P03.phx.gbl...

>Hi to all folks,

i am trying to understand the use of System.Transact ions in general and
TransactionSco pe particularly.

What am i allowed to do in a using statement that wraps a
TransactionSco pe object,
so this to be rollback in case of an exception or when i do not call
scope.comple te ??
I mean, can i set an object's variables and then un-done these sets
automaticall y
when transaction rolls back ??

For example, the following code does not work, x.var remains 2 after the
suing statement,
even if i throw an exception after var set:

class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
X x = new X();
x.var = 1;
using (TransactionSco pe scope = new
TransactionSco pe(TransactionS copeOption.Supp ress))
{
x.var = 2;
//scope.Complete( );
}
Console.WriteLi ne(x.var);
}
}
class X
{
public int var;
}
}
I am sure that i am missing something here, can anyone help ??

Kikapu

[Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]]

kikapu,

The source code that comes with the article is a pretty good example in
itself.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard. caspershouse.co m

"kikapu" <me******@newsg roups.nospamwro te in message
news:eF******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP02.phx.gbl. ..

Nicholas,

thanks for the reply!

i print now and will read this article that you send me.
Can you please give me a direction on how i can (a simple example)
register a resource with a transaction manager ??

Thanks again!
"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mv*@spam.guard .caspershouse.c omwrote
in message news:O$******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...

>kikapu,

The TransactionScop e class will only work on resources that register
themselves with the transaction mananger. Right now, the most immediate
example of a resource like this is a database. It doesn't automatically
just detect changes to anything in the scope and then roll them back if
Complete is not called.

However, it is possible to have local variables which are rolled back
in the event of an abort of a transaction. Check out the article by
Juval Lowy titled "Volatile Resource Managers in .NET Bring Transactions
to the Common Type", as it provides a mechanism by which to do this:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/is.../Transactions/

Of course, you shouldn't do this for ALL of your variables (that will
be a huge performance hit), but for the ones that you need rolled back in
the case of an abort.

Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard. caspershouse.co m

"kikapu" <me******@newsg roups.nospamwro te in message
news:ew******* ******@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...

>>Hi to all folks,

i am trying to understand the use of System.Transact ions in general and
TransactionSc ope particularly.

What am i allowed to do in a using statement that wraps a
TransactionSc ope object,
so this to be rollback in case of an exception or when i do not call
scope.complet e ??
I mean, can i set an object's variables and then un-done these sets
automatical ly
when transaction rolls back ??

For example, the following code does not work, x.var remains 2 after the
suing statement,
even if i throw an exception after var set:

class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
X x = new X();
x.var = 1;
using (TransactionSco pe scope = new
TransactionSc ope(Transaction ScopeOption.Sup press))
{
x.var = 2;
//scope.Complete( );
}
Console.WriteLi ne(x.var);
}
}
class X
{
public int var;
}
}
I am sure that i am missing something here, can anyone help ??

Kikapu