Serialization of an object containing LinkedList

[Justin Crites]

I have an object which I want to be serializable. I have marked with
with [SerializableAtt ribute]. The object only has a single data
member, which is a LinkedList<int> . This linked list is a private
member and cannot be exposed publically without violating encapsulation
of the class.

If I make the class derive from ISerializable and
IDeserializatio nCallback, I can attempt to "forward" these methods onto
the linked list. For example (assuming _list is our LinkedList<int> ):

void ISerializable.G etObjectData(Se rializationInfo info,
StreamingContex t context) {
_list.GetObject Data(info, context);
}

void IDeserializatio nCallback.OnDes erialization(ob ject sender)
{
_list.OnDeseria lization(sender );
}

This works fine. However, there's a problem: LinkedList does not
publically expose the necessary constructor. ISerializable requires
that the type have implemented a special constructor for
deserialization . This constructor takes the same arguments as
GetObjectData() , and I can implement that in my type, but what do I do?

So that's the question: how can I implement a serializable type that
contains a LinkedList?

[Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]]

Justin,

You shouldn't have to do any of that. Unless you have some other reason
for implementing custom serialization, the LinkedList<int> should serialize
just fine with using the Serializable attribute and nothing else.

I ran a test here serializing a class which contained a LinkedList and
it worked just fine.

Hope this helps.

--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard. caspershouse.co m

"Justin Crites" <jc*****@gmail. com> wrote in message
news:11******** **************@ g49g2000cwa.goo glegroups.com.. .

I have an object which I want to be serializable. I have marked with
with [SerializableAtt ribute]. The object only has a single data
member, which is a LinkedList<int> . This linked list is a private
member and cannot be exposed publically without violating encapsulation
of the class.

If I make the class derive from ISerializable and
IDeserializatio nCallback, I can attempt to "forward" these methods onto
the linked list. For example (assuming _list is our LinkedList<int> ):

void ISerializable.G etObjectData(Se rializationInfo info,
StreamingContex t context) {
_list.GetObject Data(info, context);
}

void IDeserializatio nCallback.OnDes erialization(ob ject sender)
{
_list.OnDeseria lization(sender );
}

This works fine. However, there's a problem: LinkedList does not
publically expose the necessary constructor. ISerializable requires
that the type have implemented a special constructor for
deserialization . This constructor takes the same arguments as
GetObjectData() , and I can implement that in my type, but what do I do?

So that's the question: how can I implement a serializable type that
contains a LinkedList?

[rmunson]

What about serialization of a LinkedList of List<T> where T is either a
primitive type or a class? In both cases, I get the following exception when
creating the XmlSerializer() instance:

There was an error reflecting type 'HoldsLinkedLis t'. --->
System.InvalidO perationExcepti on: You must implement a default accessor on
System.Collecti ons.Generic.Lin kedList`1[[System.Collecti ons.Generic.Lis t`1[[System.Int32,
mscorlib, Version=2.0.0.0 , Culture=neutral ,
PublicKeyToken= b77a5c561934e08 9]], mscorlib, Version=2.0.0.0 ,
Culture=neutral , PublicKeyToken= b77a5c561934e08 9]] because it inherits from
ICollection.

where

public class HoldsLinkedList
{
private LinkedList<List <int>> list;

public LinkedList<List <int>> List
{
get { return list; }
set { list = value; }
}
}

"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" wrote:

Justin,

You shouldn't have to do any of that. Unless you have some other reason
for implementing custom serialization, the LinkedList<int> should serialize
just fine with using the Serializable attribute and nothing else.

I ran a test here serializing a class which contained a LinkedList and
it worked just fine.

Hope this helps.

--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard. caspershouse.co m

"Justin Crites" <jc*****@gmail. com> wrote in message
news:11******** **************@ g49g2000cwa.goo glegroups.com.. .

I have an object which I want to be serializable. I have marked with
with [SerializableAtt ribute]. The object only has a single data
member, which is a LinkedList<int> . This linked list is a private
member and cannot be exposed publically without violating encapsulation
of the class.

If I make the class derive from ISerializable and
IDeserializatio nCallback, I can attempt to "forward" these methods onto
the linked list. For example (assuming _list is our LinkedList<int> ):

void ISerializable.G etObjectData(Se rializationInfo info,
StreamingContex t context) {
_list.GetObject Data(info, context);
}

void IDeserializatio nCallback.OnDes erialization(ob ject sender)
{
_list.OnDeseria lization(sender );
}

This works fine. However, there's a problem: LinkedList does not
publically expose the necessary constructor. ISerializable requires
that the type have implemented a special constructor for
deserialization . This constructor takes the same arguments as
GetObjectData() , and I can implement that in my type, but what do I do?

So that's the question: how can I implement a serializable type that
contains a LinkedList?