INSERT without knowing database column order?

[AdamM]

Currently, my code reads from a database without knowing the order of the
columns like this:

string name = (string)datarow["name"];
However, is there a way to write or do an INSERT back to a database without
getting caught up in the order of the columns?

Right now I do something like this, which is delicate and breaks if the
order of the columns changes:

database.Execut eNonQuery("INSE RT INTO dbtable VALUES ('texas', 'austin',
1971)";

Thanks in advance!

[Mark Rae]

"AdamM" <no****@nospam. com> wrote in message
news:bJ******** ************@co mcast.com...

However, is there a way to write or do an INSERT back to a database
without getting caught up in the order of the columns?

"INSERT INTO dbtable (state, city, date) VALUES ('texas', 'austin', 1971)";

Obviously, amend the column names accordingly :-)

Otherwise, use a parameterised stored procedure.

[Hans Kesting]

AdamM wrote:

Currently, my code reads from a database without knowing the order of the
columns like this:

string name = (string)datarow["name"];
However, is there a way to write or do an INSERT back to a database without
getting caught up in the order of the columns?

Right now I do something like this, which is delicate and breaks if the
order of the columns changes:

database.Execut eNonQuery("INSE RT INTO dbtable VALUES ('texas', 'austin',
1971)";

Thanks in advance!

You can use the "full" syntax:
INSERT INTO <tablename> (<columnlist>) VALUES (<valuelist>)

for instance (guessing a bit)
INSERT INTO dbtable (state, town, year) VALUES ('texas', 'austin', 1971)

the order of values needs to be the same as the columns ("1971" maps to
"year"), but it is independent of the order in the table definition.
You can also skip columns this way, to have the database use the defined
default values.
--
Hans Kesting