DataGrid exchanging a DataSource, but Columns are added...

[Alexander]

Hi, I am using a DataGrid and assign a DataTable as a DataSource to
it:

void ShowData()
{
DataTable myNewDataTable = new DataTable();
... // fill table
this.m_DataGrid 1.DataSource = myNewDataTable;
this.Refresh();
}

I create the DataTable from the scratch of some XML data and then
simply assign it. This works perfectly, the table with all the columns
is displayed.

If I call the function a second time, and assign a new DataTable as a
DataSource, the new table is added to the grid instead of replacing
the old one. So if the old table had columns 1, 2 and 3 and the new
table 98, 99, the result is a grid with the columns 1, 2, 3, 98, 99.

I already debugged, to make sure if the new DataTable really has only
2 columns and that afterwards the new DataSource of the DataGrid has
only 2 columns, too. But displayed are 5 columns afterwards...

Is there a special trick to replace the DataSource?

[Dmitriy Lapshin [C# / .NET MVP]]

Hi,

If it's a WinForms DataGrid, try using the SetDataBinding method instead.

--
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Lapshin [C# / .NET MVP]
Bring the power of unit testing to the VS .NET IDE today!
http://www.x-unity.net/teststudio.aspx

"Alexander" <jo*******@gmx. de> wrote in message
news:84******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com...

Hi, I am using a DataGrid and assign a DataTable as a DataSource to
it:

void ShowData()
{
DataTable myNewDataTable = new DataTable();
... // fill table
this.m_DataGrid 1.DataSource = myNewDataTable;
this.Refresh();
}

I create the DataTable from the scratch of some XML data and then
simply assign it. This works perfectly, the table with all the columns
is displayed.

If I call the function a second time, and assign a new DataTable as a
DataSource, the new table is added to the grid instead of replacing
the old one. So if the old table had columns 1, 2 and 3 and the new
table 98, 99, the result is a grid with the columns 1, 2, 3, 98, 99.

I already debugged, to make sure if the new DataTable really has only
2 columns and that afterwards the new DataSource of the DataGrid has
only 2 columns, too. But displayed are 5 columns afterwards...

Is there a special trick to replace the DataSource?

[Paul]

If I understand correctly, you are going through the same problem I had recently.
here is some code.
all you need to do is to create a new table.

private void LoadData(System .Data.DataTable dt)
{
try
{
this.dataSet.Ta bles.Clear();
}
catch{}

this.dataTable = null;
this.dataTable = dt.Copy();
this.dataSet.Ta bles.Add(dataTa ble);
this.dataSet.Ac ceptChanges();

string member = dataTable.Table Name;
this.dataGrid1. SetDataBinding( dataSet,member) ;
this.dataGrid1. CaptionText = member;
}

Hope this will help
Paul

jo*******@gmx.d e (Alexander) wrote in message news:<84******* *************** ****@posting.go ogle.com>...

Hi, I am using a DataGrid and assign a DataTable as a DataSource to
it:

void ShowData()
{
DataTable myNewDataTable = new DataTable();
... // fill table
this.m_DataGrid 1.DataSource = myNewDataTable;
this.Refresh();
}

I create the DataTable from the scratch of some XML data and then
simply assign it. This works perfectly, the table with all the columns
is displayed.

If I call the function a second time, and assign a new DataTable as a
DataSource, the new table is added to the grid instead of replacing
the old one. So if the old table had columns 1, 2 and 3 and the new
table 98, 99, the result is a grid with the columns 1, 2, 3, 98, 99.

I already debugged, to make sure if the new DataTable really has only
2 columns and that afterwards the new DataSource of the DataGrid has
only 2 columns, too. But displayed are 5 columns afterwards...

Is there a special trick to replace the DataSource?

[Alexander]

Thanks Paul, that brought me near to the solution.

I was not aware of the internal structure of the DataSource and what
happens if I assign something to it. So I created tables without names
and thought I would replace the old table by assigning it to the
datasource, but instead I added a nameless table to it. The solution
is simply give the table I create a unique name, so it really replaces
the old one with the same name.