I just called:
System.Environm ent.Version.ToS tring()
and
RuntimeEnvironm ent.GetSystemVe rsion()
as a little experiment.
Both report that I'm running 1.0.3705.288. However, my IDE is VS.NET 2003
and I never installed VS.NET 2002 on this machine. I don't recall if
something else has ever forced me to install framework 1.0 on this machine
(obviously, it's on here, but I just don't recall how it got here)... but
what is shocking is that version 1.0 is the default and that all the
projects I'm building are using 1.0. I didn't previously realize this.
How can I correct this? Is there a reason for it? Can anyone explain what I
overlooked?
Thanks.
Dave
19  1136 
Are you running XP ? It is built into the OS........
"Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc@attbi.com > wrote in message
news:GKzkb.8224 56$Ho3.225090@s ccrnsc03... I just called:
System.Environm ent.Version.ToS tring()
and
RuntimeEnvironm ent.GetSystemVe rsion()
as a little experiment.
Both report that I'm running 1.0.3705.288. However, my IDE is VS.NET 2003
and I never installed VS.NET 2002 on this machine. I don't recall if
something else has ever forced me to install framework 1.0 on this machine
(obviously, it's on here, but I just don't recall how it got here)... but
what is shocking is that version 1.0 is the default and that all the
projects I'm building are using 1.0. I didn't previously realize this.
How can I correct this? Is there a reason for it? Can anyone explain what
I overlooked?
Thanks.
Dave
I just did a test as well and got what I expected....1.0 on a 1.0 build, 1.1
on a 2003 build. The only thing I can think of that would cause this is the
fact that you can build 1.0 projects in 2003, but you usually have to set it
explicitly. Check the Assembly Properties and under Common Properties,
select Build. There's a seperator on the bottom of the form titled
Supported Runtimes. It says, "By Default, add.config supports running on
..NET Framework 1.1" however, there is a change button next to it. Verify
that you are getting this and try changing it to 1.1 if it's not set. I'm
guessing that something in app.config is set to 1.0 (weird things happen and
perhaps this got set somehow) or somehow the default was changed. When you
select the Change button, you'll see three option buttons indicating 1.1,
1.0 or both 1.0 and 1.1..
HTH,
Bill
"Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc@attbi.com > wrote in message
news:GKzkb.8224 56$Ho3.225090@s ccrnsc03... I just called:
System.Environm ent.Version.ToS tring()
and
RuntimeEnvironm ent.GetSystemVe rsion()
as a little experiment.
Both report that I'm running 1.0.3705.288. However, my IDE is VS.NET 2003
and I never installed VS.NET 2002 on this machine. I don't recall if
something else has ever forced me to install framework 1.0 on this machine
(obviously, it's on here, but I just don't recall how it got here)... but
what is shocking is that version 1.0 is the default and that all the
projects I'm building are using 1.0. I didn't previously realize this.
How can I correct this? Is there a reason for it? Can anyone explain what
I overlooked?
Thanks.
Dave
BTW, in addition to Steve's comment, if you have all of the Windows updates
on your machine, you'll have both Frameworks installed.
"Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc@attbi.com > wrote in message
news:GKzkb.8224 56$Ho3.225090@s ccrnsc03... I just called:
System.Environm ent.Version.ToS tring()
and
RuntimeEnvironm ent.GetSystemVe rsion()
as a little experiment.
Both report that I'm running 1.0.3705.288. However, my IDE is VS.NET 2003
and I never installed VS.NET 2002 on this machine. I don't recall if
something else has ever forced me to install framework 1.0 on this machine
(obviously, it's on here, but I just don't recall how it got here)... but
what is shocking is that version 1.0 is the default and that all the
projects I'm building are using 1.0. I didn't previously realize this.
How can I correct this? Is there a reason for it? Can anyone explain what
I overlooked?
Thanks.
Dave
Thanks Bill. This is the strangest thing I've seen in a while. BTW, I'm
running W2K. I installed VS.NET 2003 on a fresh OS install several months
ago. I've never changed the supported runtimes property, but I'll go take a
look at it. I appreciate your tips.
Dave
"William Ryan" <do********@nos pam.comcast.net > wrote in message
news:eo******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl... I just did a test as well and got what I expected....1.0 on a 1.0 build,
1.1 on a 2003 build. The only thing I can think of that would cause this is
the fact that you can build 1.0 projects in 2003, but you usually have to set
it explicitly. Check the Assembly Properties and under Common Properties,
select Build. There's a seperator on the bottom of the form titled
Supported Runtimes. It says, "By Default, add.config supports running on
.NET Framework 1.1" however, there is a change button next to it. Verify
that you are getting this and try changing it to 1.1 if it's not set. I'm
guessing that something in app.config is set to 1.0 (weird things happen
and perhaps this got set somehow) or somehow the default was changed. When
you select the Change button, you'll see three option buttons indicating 1.1,
1.0 or both 1.0 and 1.1..
HTH,
Bill
"Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc@attbi.com > wrote in message
news:GKzkb.8224 56$Ho3.225090@s ccrnsc03... I just called:
System.Environm ent.Version.ToS tring()
and
RuntimeEnvironm ent.GetSystemVe rsion()
as a little experiment.
Both report that I'm running 1.0.3705.288. However, my IDE is VS.NET
2003 and I never installed VS.NET 2002 on this machine. I don't recall if
something else has ever forced me to install framework 1.0 on this
machine (obviously, it's on here, but I just don't recall how it got here)...
but what is shocking is that version 1.0 is the default and that all the
projects I'm building are using 1.0. I didn't previously realize this.
How can I correct this? Is there a reason for it? Can anyone explain
what I overlooked?
Thanks.
Dave
"Steve S" <be*********@ho tmail.com> wrote in message
news:u4******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P09.phx.gbl... Are you running XP ? It is built into the OS........
Not in my experience. It may be built into Server 2003; I don't know.
Sorry... it is.....Just worked an issue this week.. which reminded me
that it is already on the machine..... when you put the OS on it... So is
MDAC 2.7
"Michael A. Covington" <lo**@www.covin gtoninnovations .com.for.addres s> wrote
in message news:uZ******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P10.phx.gbl...
"Steve S" <be*********@ho tmail.com> wrote in message
news:u4******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P09.phx.gbl... Are you running XP ? It is built into the OS........
Not in my experience. It may be built into Server 2003; I don't know.
"Steve S" <be*********@ho tmail.com> wrote in message
news:Od******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl... Sorry... it is.....Just worked an issue this week.. which reminded me
that it is already on the machine..... when you put the OS on it... So
is MDAC 2.7
What release of Windows XP has the .NET Framework built in? I have a whole
lab full of Windows XP machines that definitely do not have it built in, and
neither did my laptop.
I'm working on the issues around a laptop..... Compaq.. with XP sp1 from
the factory...... already has framework loaded on it...... seems like it
doesn't want to talk to a 2000AS server..... but another desktop
machine... XP sp1 talks just fine...... Actually, this situation is
posted in several of the other NGs, on Wed of this week......
The machines are at work..... I will check the configurations tomorrow if
I think of it..... and post the findings....... I could be in error...
but pretty sure I saw both frameworks on the machine...... It was one of
the big 'pluses'... the runtime was already on the machines.....
As for 2003... how the framework is laced into the calling stacks is very
different..... it eliminates several layers of the calling stack to get to
the actual call..... Hence the claim... do more with less..... it is
supposed to run faster....
I can't say that I have seen that yet...... management won't give me a
2003 server :(
"Michael A. Covington" <lo**@www.covin gtoninnovations .com.for.addres s> wrote
in message news:uE******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P11.phx.gbl...
"Steve S" <be*********@ho tmail.com> wrote in message
news:Od******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl... Sorry... it is.....Just worked an issue this week.. which reminded me
that it is already on the machine..... when you put the OS on it...
So is MDAC 2.7
What release of Windows XP has the .NET Framework built in? I have a
whole lab full of Windows XP machines that definitely do not have it built in,
and neither did my laptop.
From a press release:
The key features in the new operating system image include the NET
Framework, several security updates and support for IPv6.
Also see: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tre...asp?frame=true
This section provides a conceptual overview of how Windows XP lays the
foundation for an important part in the future of computing: the Microsoft
..NET Platform, which aims to provide a new level of connectivity that lets
you get more out of networking and the Internet.
And... http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tre...asp?frame=true
Of course, none of that guarantees what's actually on your machines...
"Michael A. Covington" <lo**@www.covin gtoninnovations .com.for.addres s> wrote
in message news:uZ******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P10.phx.gbl...
"Steve S" <be*********@ho tmail.com> wrote in message
news:u4******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P09.phx.gbl... Are you running XP ? It is built into the OS........
Not in my experience. It may be built into Server 2003; I don't know.
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Mountain Bikn' Guy |
last post by:
I just called:
System.Environment.Version.ToString()
and
RuntimeEnvironment.GetSystemVersion()
as a little experiment.
Both report that I'm running 1.0.3705.288. However, my IDE is VS.NET 2003
and I never installed VS.NET 2002 on this machine. I don't recall if
something else has ever forced me to install framework 1.0 on this machine
(obviously, it's on here, but I just don't recall how it got here)... but
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
| | |
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |
