When I write this code
namespace WindowsApplicat ion1
{
public class Form1 : System.Windows. Forms.Form
{
(...)
/// <summary>
/// Clean up any resources being used.
/// </summary>
public override void Dispose() <-------
{}
(...)
}
I obtain :
C:\Temp\CSharp\ WindowsApplicat ion1\Form1.cs(3 2):
'WindowsApplica tion1.Form1.Dis pose()' : cannot override inherited member
'System.Compone ntModel.Compone nt.Dispose()' because it is not marked
virtual, abstract, or override
And It's written in msdn :
Component
[C#]
public virtual void Dispose();
What's wrong ?
Gawel 8 18385
mistrzu a nie powinno byæ
protected override void Dispose( bool disposing )
{
....
}
pozdrawiam
Przemek Sulikowski
Gawelek,
You should be looking to override this method:
private virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
The public Dispose method just calls this method with the disposing flag
set to true. The finalizer calls the above method with the disposing
parameter set to false. The disposing flag basically tells you whether or
not to call the Dispose method on any managed components that your instance
is holding that implement IDispose.
Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- casper(1 spelled out){at)caspers (where I live, rhymes with
mouse)<dot]com
"Gawelek" <ga*****@NOSPAM EKpoczta.gazeta .pl> wrote in message
news:bl******** **@inews.gazeta .pl... When I write this code
namespace WindowsApplicat ion1 { public class Form1 : System.Windows. Forms.Form { (...) /// <summary> /// Clean up any resources being used. /// </summary> public override void Dispose() <------- {} (...) }
I obtain :
C:\Temp\CSharp\ WindowsApplicat ion1\Form1.cs(3 2): 'WindowsApplica tion1.Form1.Dis pose()' : cannot override inherited member 'System.Compone ntModel.Compone nt.Dispose()' because it is not marked virtual, abstract, or override
And It's written in msdn : Component [C#] public virtual void Dispose();
What's wrong ?
Gawel
> Gawelek, You should be looking to override this method:
Why ?
private virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
The public Dispose method just calls this method with the disposing
flag set to true. The finalizer calls the above method with the disposing parameter set to false. The disposing flag basically tells you whether or not to call the Dispose method on any managed components that your
instance is holding that implement IDispose.
Dispose() is marked virtual. Why can't I override it ?
Gawel
> > You should be looking to override this method: Why ?
can you tell us what you exactly want to do?
Dispose() is marked virtual. Why can't I override it ?
'cause it isn't virtual
Gawelek <ga*****@NOSPAM EKpoczta.gazeta .pl> wrote: Dispose() is marked virtual. Why can't I override it ?
It's a bug in the documentation. Component.Dispo se isn't actually
virtual - look at the Component class's IL and you'll see that. There
seem to be a number of methods which are documented as being virtual
but which aren't, in fact, virtual.
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.co m> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
You can implement IDisposable and make yer own , right?
"Jon Skeet" <sk***@pobox.co m> wrote in message
news:MP******** *************** *@msnews.micros oft.com... Gawelek <ga*****@NOSPAM EKpoczta.gazeta .pl> wrote: Dispose() is marked virtual. Why can't I override it ?
It's a bug in the documentation. Component.Dispo se isn't actually virtual - look at the Component class's IL and you'll see that. There seem to be a number of methods which are documented as being virtual but which aren't, in fact, virtual.
-- Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.co m> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Mr.Tickle <Mr******@mrmen .com> wrote: You can implement IDisposable and make yer own , right?
Component already implements IDisposable though. The OP should be
overriding Dispose(bool) rather than just Dispose().
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.co m> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
IDispose::Dispo se is already implemented by the Component class. Since it is
not marked virtual (since it implements the interface), you can't override
it. This must be by design, forcing you to use the form dispose method
instead.
"Gawelek" <ga*****@NOSPAM EKpoczta.gazeta .pl> wrote in message
news:bl******** **@inews.gazeta .pl... When I write this code
namespace WindowsApplicat ion1 { public class Form1 : System.Windows. Forms.Form { (...) /// <summary> /// Clean up any resources being used. /// </summary> public override void Dispose() <------- {} (...) }
I obtain :
C:\Temp\CSharp\ WindowsApplicat ion1\Form1.cs(3 2): 'WindowsApplica tion1.Form1.Dis pose()' : cannot override inherited member 'System.Compone ntModel.Compone nt.Dispose()' because it is not marked virtual, abstract, or override
And It's written in msdn : Component [C#] public virtual void Dispose();
What's wrong ?
Gawel This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: faktujaa |
last post by:
Hi All,
A small confusion. I have defined a connection class that has
System.Data.IDbConnection as a member variable and implements IDisposable
interface. I have implemented Dispose method to call Dispose method of
IDbConnection. This Dispose method is called from a destructor. In the
dispose method, i also call GC.SuppressFinalize(this) so as to avoid
finalizer. All this was OK untill i came across one article that says - not
to call...
|
by: Henrik Dahl |
last post by:
Hello!
After I've finished using an instance of the SqlCommand class, should I then
invoke Dispose() on the instance. I suppose so, as there is a Dispose
method, but what does it actually release?
I would basically prefer to skip invoking Dispose() as this will free me
from determining when the usage actually has finished.
|
by: wobbles |
last post by:
Hi Everyone,
I've read most of the posts regarding "Dispose" in this NG.
I still have some questions.
If I declare and use a disposable object (say a DB connection) within
a method, is it worth calling Dispose() within my "finally" block,
even if that object only has local scope?
When the thread exits this method, won't the GC collect my disposable
|
by: Bonnie |
last post by:
In MSDN example for IDisposable, it has the followin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Implement IDisposable
// Do not make this method virtual
// A derived class should not be able to override this method
public void Dispose(
Dispose(true)
// This object will be cleaned up by the Dispose method
// Therefore, you should call GC.SupressFinalize t
|
by: Dennis |
last post by:
Ok, I'm trying to dispose of every object that I create that has a dispose
method based on advice from this newsgroup. However, I'm not sure how to
dispose of the following object that was created inside a method call.
dim myvar as new object1
object1.dosomethingmethod(new object2)
Note that object 2 has a dispose method but how do I dispose of it unless I
do the following:
| |
by: Grafix |
last post by:
All -
As we all know, Dispose method is reserved in C++ 8 and the expected syntax
is to use ~MyClass().
In 1.1, we used to have following structure for Dispose
class MyClass : IDisposable
{
public void Dispose() { Dispose(true); GC.Supressxxx(this); }
~Dispose() { Dispose(false); } // Finalizer
|
by: Water Cooler v2 |
last post by:
I heard from someone that we must not implement IDisposable for all
classes. Can someone please tell me:
1. the reason why we must not implement IDisposable for all the classes
we write.
2. what is the correct way of implementing IDisposable.Dispose?
3. what is the preferred way, if there is one over the other, of
calling the Dispose method on an object that implements IDisposable. Is
it the way that uses the "using(object){}" construct...
|
by: AlexS |
last post by:
When I implement Dispose pattern in object implementing IDisposable, current
fxcop recommends:
Ensure that Wrapper.Dispose():Void is declared as public and sealed.
However, if I do as it asks, compiler complains that sealed can't be used
because method is not overrideable.
I believe sealed isn't applicable here at all. And this rule shouldn't be
public virtual in this case.
|
by: =?Utf-8?B?VmljdG9y?= |
last post by:
Hi,
I have a UserControl (C# WinFroms application) that requires some cleaning
code to run when a form with control is closed. Where I can put that code?
There is no ControlClosing or ControlClosed event.
I can put my code into UserControl.Desgner.cs Dispose method, but that seems
to be a bad practive.
What do I do?
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
| |
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |