How should DISPID_VALUE properties be put in the tlb for (easy) use by C#

[Aaron Queenan]

I have the following in the idl for a COM collection:

[propget, id(DISPID_VALUE ), helpstring("pro perty Item")] HRESULT
Item([in] VARIANT* Index, [out, retval] LPDISPATCH* punk);

This allows VBA to access objects in the collection using the syntax
collection("key ") or collection(1).

When I import this type library into C#, the DISPID_VALUE property appears
as 'this[]', and when I try to use the syntax similar to VBA, the compiler
complains that I must use collection.get_ Item() instead of collection().

1. How should I form the idl so that I can use the collection.Item[]
syntax, as I would be able to if I didn't use DISPID_VALUE?

2. If I use the collection.get_ Item() syntax, I must convert the Index
parameter to an 'object ref', and the method returns an object. How should
I change the idl so that the method accepts a 'string' and returns the
correct object type?

Thanks,
Aaron Queenan.

[Aaron Queenan]

I've just changed:

[propget, id(DISPID_VALUE ), helpstring("pro perty Item")]
HRESULT Item([in] VARIANT* Index, [out, retval] LPDISPATCH* punk);

to:

[propget, id(DISPID_VALUE ), helpstring("pro perty Item")]
HRESULT Item([in] VARIANT Index, [out, retval] IChain** ppChain);

Thanks for your suggestion. Changing VARIANT* to VARIANT fixes the
problem - i.e. the [] syntax works correctly. C# doesn't seem to cope with
the [] syntax when passing the index by reference, which could be a problem
with other collections. :-(

Next problem, is that I can now access the objects using collection["key"],
but if I use collection[1] I get a stack overflow. It works fine in VBA.

Thanks,
Aaron Queenan.

"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <ni************ **@exisconsulti ng.com> wrote
in message news:%2******** *******@TK2MSFT NGP12.phx.gbl.. .

Aaron,

You should be able to use the square brackets to access the information. However, you will still have to pass it as an object reference.

You could change the IDL so that it takes a variant by value (remove the pointer), but then you would have to change the underlying implementation as well. If you change it so that it takes a string (change Variant to BSTR)
then you will not have the ability to access the items by index.

Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- ni************* *@exisconsultin g.com

"Aaron Queenan" <aq************ *********@conti ngent.com.au> wrote in message news:Oy******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl...

I have the following in the idl for a COM collection:

[propget, id(DISPID_VALUE ), helpstring("pro perty Item")] HRESULT
Item([in] VARIANT* Index, [out, retval] LPDISPATCH* punk);

This allows VBA to access objects in the collection using the syntax
collection("key ") or collection(1).

When I import this type library into C#, the DISPID_VALUE property appears as 'this[]', and when I try to use the syntax similar to VBA, the compiler complains that I must use collection.get_ Item() instead of collection().

1. How should I form the idl so that I can use the collection.Item[]
syntax, as I would be able to if I didn't use DISPID_VALUE?

2. If I use the collection.get_ Item() syntax, I must convert the Index parameter to an 'object ref', and the method returns an object. How

should

I change the idl so that the method accepts a 'string' and returns the
correct object type?

Thanks,
Aaron Queenan.