Web Deploy Project in debug mode

[Hardy Wang]

Is there a way I can disable Web Deploy Project to run while I am in debug
mode?

I think Web Deploy Project is very foolish, it could not detect if code of a
website is changed or not, it will load "aspnet_merge.e xe"
"aspnet_compile r.exe"anyway, everytime when I load/debug a site, thus it
causes my machine to spend a lot of time to compile before I make some minor
change to other projects inside same solution.

--
WWW: http://www.imagestation.com/members/hardywang
ICQ: 3359839
yours Hardy

[Hardy Wang]

Thanks to God, you have the solution....

--
WWW: http://www.imagestation.com/members/hardywang
ICQ: 3359839
yours Hardy
"Steven Cheng[MSFT]" <st*****@online .microsoft.comw rote in message
news:ta******** ******@TK2MSFTN GXA01.phx.gbl.. .

Hello Hardy,

As for the "Web Deployment Project", it is just added as a normal project
into the ASP.NET Website project's solution and the only difference is
that
it is associated with the web site project(can not exist individually).
However, its building behavior(which build configuration to use) is
controlled by the solution's current "Active Solution Configuration".
There're two default build confgiurations (debug and release), we can add
our custom solution build configuration and configure existing ones in the
"Configurat ion Manager" of the solution (you can find it in the solution's
properites page).

And in the Configuration Manager, you can configure each project(include
in
the solution)'s build configuration type for the certain solution build
configuration. for your scenario, you can disable the build of the web
deployment project in the Soluton's "Debug" build configuration and only
enable it in the release build configuration. I've attached two
screenshot
demonstrating the setting(you can get it through outlook express). And in
webdeployment project's own project setting, you can configure the
detailed
settings for the different build confugration( debug and release....),
they'll be applied respectively depend on the solution's build
configuration that is choosed.

Also, this is also what is recommeded in the following webdeployment
introduction article:

#Using Web Deployment Projects with Visual Studio 2005
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en...yment_projects.
asp?frame=true

You can also view the MSDN reference about the build configuration in VS
2005:

#Build Configurations
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/kkz9kefa.aspx

Hope this helps some.

Sincerely,

Steven Cheng

Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead

=============== =============== =============== =====

Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...ult.aspx#notif
ications.

Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...t/default.aspx.

=============== =============== =============== =====

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.

[Laurent Bugnion]

Hi,

Hardy Wang wrote:

Thanks to God, you have the solution....

I could be wrong, but I'd be ready to bet that He wasn't involved.

Greetings,
Laurent
--
Laurent Bugnion, GalaSoft
Software engineering: http://www.galasoft-LB.ch
PhotoAlbum: http://www.galasoft-LB.ch/pictures
Support children in Calcutta: http://www.calcutta-espoir.ch

[Juan T. Llibre]

re:

>Thanks to God, you have the solution....

I could be wrong, but I'd be ready to bet that He wasn't involved.

Are you sure God's a "He" ?

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Laurent Bugnion" <ga*********@bl uewin.chwrote in message
news:u2******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP06.phx.gbl...

Hi,

Hardy Wang wrote:

>Thanks to God, you have the solution....

I could be wrong, but I'd be ready to bet that He wasn't involved.

Greetings,
Laurent
--
Laurent Bugnion, GalaSoft
Software engineering: http://www.galasoft-LB.ch
PhotoAlbum: http://www.galasoft-LB.ch/pictures
Support children in Calcutta: http://www.calcutta-espoir.ch

[Laurent Bugnion]

Hi,

Juan T. Llibre wrote:

re:

>>>Thanks to God, you have the solution....

I could be wrong, but I'd be ready to bet that He wasn't involved.

Are you sure God's a "He" ?

I am not even sure that God is. :-)

That said, if He is, then He must be a guy. No woman could be so wicked
and mean.

Laurent
--
Laurent Bugnion, GalaSoft
Software engineering: http://www.galasoft-LB.ch
PhotoAlbum: http://www.galasoft-LB.ch/pictures
Support children in Calcutta: http://www.calcutta-espoir.ch