I have read in one article that when we compile the application in release
mode, all the debug classes and properties will be automatically removed from
the code. I tried to implement this thing by using the following code in
Page_Load event handler.
Private Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As
System.EventArg s) Handles MyBase.Load
Dim intcount As Integer
intcount = 0
For intcount = 0 To 4
Response.Write( intcount)
Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it is 3.")
Next
End Sub
I have selected "Release" in the solution cofiguartions dropdown list and
compiled the application. The statement " Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it
is 3.") " is not removed from the code. I have closed the solution and opened
the solution. Even then also the statement is not removed. What we have to do
if the statement has to be removed automatically?
Any help most welcome.
Regards
G.V.Srinivasa Rao. 7 2911
Release mode does not remove statements, it simply does not provide a
programming debugging database file. (well it does some other stuff as
well). The major difference is that you will not be able to attach the
debugger in release mode because of the absence of that file. The compiler
does maintain the integrity and structure of your code, so the debug.assert
will still be there.
--
Regards,
Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]
[Shameless Author plug]
The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET
Now Available @ http://www.lulu.com/owc
----------------------------------------------------------
"Srinivasa Rao" <Sr**********@d iscussions.micr osoft.com> wrote in message
news:CF******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... I have read in one article that when we compile the application in release mode, all the debug classes and properties will be automatically removed from the code. I tried to implement this thing by using the following code in Page_Load event handler.
Private Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArg s) Handles MyBase.Load Dim intcount As Integer intcount = 0 For intcount = 0 To 4 Response.Write( intcount) Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it is 3.") Next End Sub
I have selected "Release" in the solution cofiguartions dropdown list and compiled the application. The statement " Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it is 3.") " is not removed from the code. I have closed the solution and opened the solution. Even then also the statement is not removed. What we have to do if the statement has to be removed automatically?
Any help most welcome.
Regards G.V.Srinivasa Rao.
Srinivasa:
What are you using to see if the Debug.Assert is removed? It won't actually
remove it from the source code (which is what ou have bellow) but from the
actual assembly (the resulting DLL). If you get http://www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet/ it'll let you see this code and you
should see that, infact, Debug.Assert is removed when compiled in release
mode.
Also note that Debug.Assert doesn't work in aSP.Net.
Karl
--
MY ASP.Net tutorials http://www.openmymind.net/
"Srinivasa Rao" <Sr**********@d iscussions.micr osoft.com> wrote in message
news:CF******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... I have read in one article that when we compile the application in release mode, all the debug classes and properties will be automatically removed from the code. I tried to implement this thing by using the following code in Page_Load event handler.
Private Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArg s) Handles MyBase.Load Dim intcount As Integer intcount = 0 For intcount = 0 To 4 Response.Write( intcount) Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it is 3.") Next End Sub
I have selected "Release" in the solution cofiguartions dropdown list and compiled the application. The statement " Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it is 3.") " is not removed from the code. I have closed the solution and opened the solution. Even then also the statement is not removed. What we have to do if the statement has to be removed automatically?
Any help most welcome.
Regards G.V.Srinivasa Rao.
Alvin:
I'm pretty sure this is incorrect. Release mode will renove all statements
from the System.Diagnost ic.Debug class
Karl
--
MY ASP.Net tutorials http://www.openmymind.net/
"Alvin Bruney [MVP]" <vapor at steaming post office> wrote in message
news:%2******** **********@tk2m sftngp13.phx.gb l... Release mode does not remove statements, it simply does not provide a programming debugging database file. (well it does some other stuff as well). The major difference is that you will not be able to attach the debugger in release mode because of the absence of that file. The compiler does maintain the integrity and structure of your code, so the
debug.assert will still be there.
-- Regards, Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]
[Shameless Author plug] The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET Now Available @ http://www.lulu.com/owc ----------------------------------------------------------
"Srinivasa Rao" <Sr**********@d iscussions.micr osoft.com> wrote in message news:CF******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...I have read in one article that when we compile the application in
release mode, all the debug classes and properties will be automatically removed from the code. I tried to implement this thing by using the following code in Page_Load event handler.
Private Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArg s) Handles MyBase.Load Dim intcount As Integer intcount = 0 For intcount = 0 To 4 Response.Write( intcount) Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it is 3.") Next End Sub
I have selected "Release" in the solution cofiguartions dropdown list
and compiled the application. The statement " Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3,
"Yes it is 3.") " is not removed from the code. I have closed the solution and opened the solution. Even then also the statement is not removed. What we have
to do if the statement has to be removed automatically?
Any help most welcome.
Regards G.V.Srinivasa Rao.
Test it for yourself then. Build this in debug and compare the results to
release mode. On my system, the debug line is still in there.
[STAThread]
static void Main(string[] args)
{
System.Diagnost ics.Debug.Asser t(args != null);
}
You will find that the major difference between debug and release is that
optimization is turned on and debug symbols are not emitted. Most of this
optimization is done by the JITTER and not the language compiler so had you
prefaced your comment to specifiy the Jitted code you would have been
correct. Unfortunately, I was referring to the source code integrity, not
the IL code.
--
Regards,
Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]
[Shameless Author plug]
The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET
Now Available @ http://www.lulu.com/owc
----------------------------------------------------------
"Karl Seguin" <karl REMOVE @ REMOVE openmymind REMOVEMETOO . ANDME net>
wrote in message news:et******** ******@tk2msftn gp13.phx.gbl... Alvin: I'm pretty sure this is incorrect. Release mode will renove all statements from the System.Diagnost ic.Debug class
Karl -- MY ASP.Net tutorials http://www.openmymind.net/
"Alvin Bruney [MVP]" <vapor at steaming post office> wrote in message news:%2******** **********@tk2m sftngp13.phx.gb l... Release mode does not remove statements, it simply does not provide a programming debugging database file. (well it does some other stuff as well). The major difference is that you will not be able to attach the debugger in release mode because of the absence of that file. The compiler does maintain the integrity and structure of your code, so the debug.assert will still be there.
-- Regards, Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]
[Shameless Author plug] The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET Now Available @ http://www.lulu.com/owc ----------------------------------------------------------
"Srinivasa Rao" <Sr**********@d iscussions.micr osoft.com> wrote in message news:CF******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... >I have read in one article that when we compile the application in release > mode, all the debug classes and properties will be automatically > removed > from > the code. I tried to implement this thing by using the following code > in > Page_Load event handler. > > Private Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As > System.EventArg s) Handles MyBase.Load > Dim intcount As Integer > intcount = 0 > For intcount = 0 To 4 > Response.Write( intcount) > Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it is 3.") > Next > End Sub > > I have selected "Release" in the solution cofiguartions dropdown list and > compiled the application. The statement " Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes > it > is 3.") " is not removed from the code. I have closed the solution and > opened > the solution. Even then also the statement is not removed. What we have to > do > if the statement has to be removed automatically? > > Any help most welcome. > > Regards > G.V.Srinivasa Rao.
If I compile that code in debug mode then dissassemble the EXE, I get:
[STAThread]
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
Debug.Assert(ar gs != null);
}
if I compile it in release mode than dissassemble the EXE, I get:
[STAThread]
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
}
or the IL for it:
DEBUG:
..method private hidebysig static void Main(string[] args) cil managed
{
.custom instance void [mscorlib]System.STAThrea dAttribute::.ct or()
.entrypoint
// Code Size: 13 byte(s)
.maxstack 2
L_0000: ldarg.0
L_0001: ldnull
L_0002: ceq
L_0004: ldc.i4.0
L_0005: ceq
L_0007: call void [System]System.Diagnost ics.Debug::Asse rt(bool)
L_000c: ret
}
RELEASE:
..method private hidebysig static void Main(string[] args) cil managed
{
.custom instance void [mscorlib]System.STAThrea dAttribute::.ct or()
.entrypoint
// Code Size: 1 byte(s)
.maxstack 0
L_0000: ret
}
It should be noted that this is the default bahaviour in VS.Net...if you are
using the command line compiler, or another one, the behaviour might be
different.This is based on the DEBUG compilation flag. You can find out
more about this at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...classtopic.asp
Karl
--
MY ASP.Net tutorials http://www.openmymind.net/
"Alvin Bruney [MVP]" <vapor at steaming post office> wrote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP10.phx.gbl. .. Test it for yourself then. Build this in debug and compare the results to release mode. On my system, the debug line is still in there.
[STAThread]
static void Main(string[] args)
{
System.Diagnost ics.Debug.Asser t(args != null);
}
You will find that the major difference between debug and release is that optimization is turned on and debug symbols are not emitted. Most of this optimization is done by the JITTER and not the language compiler so had
you prefaced your comment to specifiy the Jitted code you would have been correct. Unfortunately, I was referring to the source code integrity, not the IL code.
-- Regards, Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]
[Shameless Author plug] The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET Now Available @ http://www.lulu.com/owc ----------------------------------------------------------
"Karl Seguin" <karl REMOVE @ REMOVE openmymind REMOVEMETOO . ANDME net> wrote in message news:et******** ******@tk2msftn gp13.phx.gbl... Alvin: I'm pretty sure this is incorrect. Release mode will renove all statements from the System.Diagnost ic.Debug class
Karl -- MY ASP.Net tutorials http://www.openmymind.net/
"Alvin Bruney [MVP]" <vapor at steaming post office> wrote in message news:%2******** **********@tk2m sftngp13.phx.gb l... Release mode does not remove statements, it simply does not provide a programming debugging database file. (well it does some other stuff as well). The major difference is that you will not be able to attach the debugger in release mode because of the absence of that file. The compiler does maintain the integrity and structure of your code, so the debug.assert will still be there.
-- Regards, Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]
[Shameless Author plug] The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET Now Available @ http://www.lulu.com/owc ----------------------------------------------------------
"Srinivasa Rao" <Sr**********@d iscussions.micr osoft.com> wrote in
message news:CF******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... >I have read in one article that when we compile the application in release > mode, all the debug classes and properties will be automatically > removed > from > the code. I tried to implement this thing by using the following code > in > Page_Load event handler. > > Private Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As > System.EventArg s) Handles MyBase.Load > Dim intcount As Integer > intcount = 0 > For intcount = 0 To 4 > Response.Write( intcount) > Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it is 3.") > Next > End Sub > > I have selected "Release" in the solution cofiguartions dropdown list and > compiled the application. The statement " Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes > it > is 3.") " is not removed from the code. I have closed the solution
and > opened > the solution. Even then also the statement is not removed. What we
have to > do > if the statement has to be removed automatically? > > Any help most welcome. > > Regards > G.V.Srinivasa Rao.
I didn't say you were wrong. I said that I was referring to the source code
which is what the OP is referring to and not the IL code or the compiled
assembly. I have selected "Release" in the solution cofiguartions dropdown list and compiled the application. The statement " Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it 3.") " is not removed from the code.
Unfortunately, I was referring to the source code integrity, not the IL code.
--
Regards,
Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]
[Shameless Author plug]
The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET
Now Available @ http://www.lulu.com/owc
----------------------------------------------------------
"Karl Seguin" <karl REMOVE @ REMOVE openmymind REMOVEMETOO . ANDME net>
wrote in message news:OT******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl... If I compile that code in debug mode then dissassemble the EXE, I get: [STAThread] private static void Main(string[] args) { Debug.Assert(ar gs != null); } if I compile it in release mode than dissassemble the EXE, I get:
[STAThread] private static void Main(string[] args) { }
or the IL for it: DEBUG: .method private hidebysig static void Main(string[] args) cil managed { .custom instance void [mscorlib]System.STAThrea dAttribute::.ct or() .entrypoint // Code Size: 13 byte(s) .maxstack 2 L_0000: ldarg.0 L_0001: ldnull L_0002: ceq L_0004: ldc.i4.0 L_0005: ceq L_0007: call void [System]System.Diagnost ics.Debug::Asse rt(bool) L_000c: ret }
RELEASE: .method private hidebysig static void Main(string[] args) cil managed { .custom instance void [mscorlib]System.STAThrea dAttribute::.ct or() .entrypoint // Code Size: 1 byte(s) .maxstack 0 L_0000: ret }
It should be noted that this is the default bahaviour in VS.Net...if you are using the command line compiler, or another one, the behaviour might be different.This is based on the DEBUG compilation flag. You can find out more about this at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...classtopic.asp
Karl
-- MY ASP.Net tutorials http://www.openmymind.net/
"Alvin Bruney [MVP]" <vapor at steaming post office> wrote in message news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP10.phx.gbl. .. Test it for yourself then. Build this in debug and compare the results to release mode. On my system, the debug line is still in there.
[STAThread]
static void Main(string[] args)
{
System.Diagnost ics.Debug.Asser t(args != null);
}
You will find that the major difference between debug and release is that optimization is turned on and debug symbols are not emitted. Most of this optimization is done by the JITTER and not the language compiler so had you prefaced your comment to specifiy the Jitted code you would have been correct. Unfortunately, I was referring to the source code integrity, not the IL code.
-- Regards, Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]
[Shameless Author plug] The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET Now Available @ http://www.lulu.com/owc ----------------------------------------------------------
"Karl Seguin" <karl REMOVE @ REMOVE openmymind REMOVEMETOO . ANDME net> wrote in message news:et******** ******@tk2msftn gp13.phx.gbl... > Alvin: > I'm pretty sure this is incorrect. Release mode will renove all > statements > from the System.Diagnost ic.Debug class > > Karl > -- > MY ASP.Net tutorials > http://www.openmymind.net/ > > > "Alvin Bruney [MVP]" <vapor at steaming post office> wrote in message > news:%2******** **********@tk2m sftngp13.phx.gb l... >> Release mode does not remove statements, it simply does not provide a >> programming debugging database file. (well it does some other stuff as >> well). The major difference is that you will not be able to attach the >> debugger in release mode because of the absence of that file. The >> compiler >> does maintain the integrity and structure of your code, so the > debug.assert >> will still be there. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET] >> >> [Shameless Author plug] >> The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET >> Now Available @ http://www.lulu.com/owc >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> "Srinivasa Rao" <Sr**********@d iscussions.micr osoft.com> wrote in message >> news:CF******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... >> >I have read in one article that when we compile the application in > release >> > mode, all the debug classes and properties will be automatically >> > removed >> > from >> > the code. I tried to implement this thing by using the following >> > code >> > in >> > Page_Load event handler. >> > >> > Private Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As >> > System.EventArg s) Handles MyBase.Load >> > Dim intcount As Integer >> > intcount = 0 >> > For intcount = 0 To 4 >> > Response.Write( intcount) >> > Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it is 3.") >> > Next >> > End Sub >> > >> > I have selected "Release" in the solution cofiguartions dropdown >> > list > and >> > compiled the application. The statement " Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, > "Yes >> > it >> > is 3.") " is not removed from the code. I have closed the solution and >> > opened >> > the solution. Even then also the statement is not removed. What we have > to >> > do >> > if the statement has to be removed automatically? >> > >> > Any help most welcome. >> > >> > Regards >> > G.V.Srinivasa Rao. >> >> > >
Oh, my bad :) I sort of addressed this in my initial reply to the OP I
guess my head was within the context of my reply and not yours
karl
--
MY ASP.Net tutorials http://www.openmymind.net/
"Alvin Bruney [MVP]" <vapor at steaming post office> wrote in message
news:e$******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl... I didn't say you were wrong. I said that I was referring to the source
code which is what the OP is referring to and not the IL code or the compiled assembly.
I have selected "Release" in the solution cofiguartions dropdown list and compiled the application. The statement " Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it 3.") " is not removed from the code.
Unfortunately, I was referring to the source code integrity, not the IL code.
-- Regards, Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]
[Shameless Author plug] The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET Now Available @ http://www.lulu.com/owc ----------------------------------------------------------
"Karl Seguin" <karl REMOVE @ REMOVE openmymind REMOVEMETOO . ANDME net> wrote in message news:OT******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl... If I compile that code in debug mode then dissassemble the EXE, I get: [STAThread] private static void Main(string[] args) { Debug.Assert(ar gs != null); } if I compile it in release mode than dissassemble the EXE, I get:
[STAThread] private static void Main(string[] args) { }
or the IL for it: DEBUG: .method private hidebysig static void Main(string[] args) cil managed { .custom instance void [mscorlib]System.STAThrea dAttribute::.ct or() .entrypoint // Code Size: 13 byte(s) .maxstack 2 L_0000: ldarg.0 L_0001: ldnull L_0002: ceq L_0004: ldc.i4.0 L_0005: ceq L_0007: call void [System]System.Diagnost ics.Debug::Asse rt(bool) L_000c: ret }
RELEASE: .method private hidebysig static void Main(string[] args) cil managed { .custom instance void [mscorlib]System.STAThrea dAttribute::.ct or() .entrypoint // Code Size: 1 byte(s) .maxstack 0 L_0000: ret }
It should be noted that this is the default bahaviour in VS.Net...if you are using the command line compiler, or another one, the behaviour might be different.This is based on the DEBUG compilation flag. You can find out more about this at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...classtopic.asp Karl
-- MY ASP.Net tutorials http://www.openmymind.net/
"Alvin Bruney [MVP]" <vapor at steaming post office> wrote in message news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP10.phx.gbl. .. Test it for yourself then. Build this in debug and compare the results
to release mode. On my system, the debug line is still in there.
[STAThread]
static void Main(string[] args)
{
System.Diagnost ics.Debug.Asser t(args != null);
}
You will find that the major difference between debug and release is
that optimization is turned on and debug symbols are not emitted. Most of
this optimization is done by the JITTER and not the language compiler so had you prefaced your comment to specifiy the Jitted code you would have been correct. Unfortunately, I was referring to the source code integrity,
not the IL code.
-- Regards, Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]
[Shameless Author plug] The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET Now Available @ http://www.lulu.com/owc ----------------------------------------------------------
"Karl Seguin" <karl REMOVE @ REMOVE openmymind REMOVEMETOO . ANDME net> wrote in message news:et******** ******@tk2msftn gp13.phx.gbl... > Alvin: > I'm pretty sure this is incorrect. Release mode will renove all > statements > from the System.Diagnost ic.Debug class > > Karl > -- > MY ASP.Net tutorials > http://www.openmymind.net/ > > > "Alvin Bruney [MVP]" <vapor at steaming post office> wrote in message > news:%2******** **********@tk2m sftngp13.phx.gb l... >> Release mode does not remove statements, it simply does not provide
a >> programming debugging database file. (well it does some other stuff
as >> well). The major difference is that you will not be able to attach
the >> debugger in release mode because of the absence of that file. The >> compiler >> does maintain the integrity and structure of your code, so the > debug.assert >> will still be there. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET] >> >> [Shameless Author plug] >> The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET >> Now Available @ http://www.lulu.com/owc >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> "Srinivasa Rao" <Sr**********@d iscussions.micr osoft.com> wrote in message >> news:CF******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... >> >I have read in one article that when we compile the application in > release >> > mode, all the debug classes and properties will be automatically >> > removed >> > from >> > the code. I tried to implement this thing by using the following >> > code >> > in >> > Page_Load event handler. >> > >> > Private Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As >> > System.EventArg s) Handles MyBase.Load >> > Dim intcount As Integer >> > intcount = 0 >> > For intcount = 0 To 4 >> > Response.Write( intcount) >> > Debug.Assert(in tcount = 3, "Yes it is 3.") >> > Next >> > End Sub >> > >> > I have selected "Release" in the solution cofiguartions dropdown >> > list > and >> > compiled the application. The statement " Debug.Assert(in tcount =
3, > "Yes >> > it >> > is 3.") " is not removed from the code. I have closed the solution and >> > opened >> > the solution. Even then also the statement is not removed. What we have > to >> > do >> > if the statement has to be removed automatically? >> > >> > Any help most welcome. >> > >> > Regards >> > G.V.Srinivasa Rao. >> >> > >
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: dee |
last post by:
Hi
I'm about to upload my site and I have switched to release version. Is that
enough or do I still need to disable
<compilation defaultLanguage="vb" debug="true" />
the debug="true" in the .pdb file?
Is the .pdb necessary for the release version?
Thanks a bunch.
Dara
|
by: |
last post by:
Since I need to dotfuscate my exe file anyway, does it make any
difference if I use Debug or Release versions. Would a Debug
version be easier to decompile/study/reverse engineer than a
Release version, both having been dotfuscated by the standard
dotfuscator of visual studio 2003 ?
Tia
|
by: Epetruk |
last post by:
Hello,
In VS2003, I used to have two solutions - a debug and release solution.
Each solution had a webservice project and several other class library
projects. The webservice project referenced all the other class library
projects (i.e. so that it used the dll created when those other projects
were built).
The debug solution was configured so that all the projects in it had debug
|
by: Epetruk |
last post by:
Hello,
I have a problem where an application I am working on throws an
OutOfMemoryException when I run it in Release mode, whereas it doesn't do
this when I am running in Debug.
The application is developed using C++/Managed C++ and built using VS 2003
under .NET framework 1.1.
In Debug, it uses of up to 600Mb of memory, whereas in Release it only gets
|
by: Andrew Rowley |
last post by:
I am having trouble getting debug and release builds to work properly
with project references using C++ .NET and Visual Studio 2003.
I created a test solution, with a basic Windows form C++ project.
I then add a class library, and add a reference to this project in the
first project.
When I do a release build, I see the following in the output from the
DLL compile:
/OUT:"C:\Documents and Settings\Andrew\My Documents\Visual Studio
| |
by: Bob Johnson |
last post by:
It is my understanding - and please correct me if I'm wrong - that when
building a project in debug mode, I can deploy the .pdb file along with the
..exe and thereby have access to the specific line number of code that throws
an exception. Specifically, I can have an error logging routine that,
amongst other things parses the call stack and tells me the specific line of
code that choked.
It is also my understanding that if building in...
|
by: TBass |
last post by:
Hello,
Is there a way to get Visual Studio 2003 look to one directory for
debug version dlls when set to DEBUG and then to another directory
where I store the release version of a dll when set to RELEASE?
My current project uses about 8 dlls I've written in the past, but I
don't want to keep re-compiling them for debug/release depending on
whether I'm compiling the current project for debug/release.
|
by: Dave Johansen |
last post by:
I just converted a solution from Visual Studio 2003 to Visual Studio
2005 and the Debug mode seems to be running just fine, but the Release
mode crashes on the following code:
std::ifstream in("myfile.txt");
float value;
in >value; //The crash happens here in the getloc() function
The above code is actually from a library built in Debug mode that is
linked into the Release build of the executable. Does anyone have any
|
by: =?Utf-8?B?bG10dGFn?= |
last post by:
We have developed a number of different applications (ASP.NET web site,
Windows services, DLLs, Windows forms, etc.) in C# 2.0. We have developed
and unit tested all these applications/components using Debug mode. Now we
are ready to compile everything for release to production. However, we don’t
know whether we should compile all the applications/components/assemblies
using Release mode (or keep everything in Debug mode).
We’ve...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| |
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |